Labor epidural analgesia among Han and Uyghur parturients: a prospective observational study in China

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY International journal of obstetric anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104291
Xiaoqian Deng , Xueyu Zhang , Junyu Yan , Ruhui Liu , Yun Shi
{"title":"Labor epidural analgesia among Han and Uyghur parturients: a prospective observational study in China","authors":"Xiaoqian Deng ,&nbsp;Xueyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Junyu Yan ,&nbsp;Ruhui Liu ,&nbsp;Yun Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Disparities in pain sensitivity and tolerance have been described, however little is known about variability in the experience of labor pain and childbirth in China.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Xinjiang, China with two major ethnic groups: Han and Uyghur women. Women with a vaginal delivery with labor epidural analgesia were enrolled. The primary outcome was cervical dilation at labor epidural analgesia request, and multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to determine associated variables. Secondary outcomes were pain score at epidural request and epidural analgesics use. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Cervical dilatation at labor epidural analgesia request was significantly lower (1.2 ± 0.7 vs. 0.8 ± 0.6 cm; p = 0.0095), and pain score (numerical pain scale 0–10) was significantly higher (0.8 ± 1.0 vs. 4.2 ± 1.2; <em>P</em> = 0.0002) among Uyghur compared to Han women. In the multivariate model, Uyghur women had a lower cervical dilation (p = 0.0392) and a higher pain score (<em>P</em> &lt;0.0001) at epidural request. During the labor process, a larger proportion of Uyghur women used the patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) pump (77.8% vs. 53.6%, <em>P</em> = 0.0011). They pressed the pump in a significantly shorter time (61.3 ± 41.2 vs. 104.0 ± 105.2 min, <em>P</em> = 0.0015) and for more times (1.9 ± 1.7 vs. 1.2 ± 1.4, <em>P</em> = 0.0022), contributing to significantly more epidural analgesic use (sufentanil: 0.06 ± 0.02 vs. 0.07 ± 0.03 μg/kg/h, <em>P</em> = 0.0150, ropivacaine: 0.11 ± 0.04 vs. 0.14 ± 0.06 mg/kg/h, <em>P</em> = 0.0003, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings suggest that Uyghur women experience labor pain with higher levels of pain and with higher use of epidural analgesics than Han women. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether these differences are clinically relevant.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 104291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X24003030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Disparities in pain sensitivity and tolerance have been described, however little is known about variability in the experience of labor pain and childbirth in China.

Methods

This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Xinjiang, China with two major ethnic groups: Han and Uyghur women. Women with a vaginal delivery with labor epidural analgesia were enrolled. The primary outcome was cervical dilation at labor epidural analgesia request, and multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to determine associated variables. Secondary outcomes were pain score at epidural request and epidural analgesics use. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.

Results

Cervical dilatation at labor epidural analgesia request was significantly lower (1.2 ± 0.7 vs. 0.8 ± 0.6 cm; p = 0.0095), and pain score (numerical pain scale 0–10) was significantly higher (0.8 ± 1.0 vs. 4.2 ± 1.2; P = 0.0002) among Uyghur compared to Han women. In the multivariate model, Uyghur women had a lower cervical dilation (p = 0.0392) and a higher pain score (P <0.0001) at epidural request. During the labor process, a larger proportion of Uyghur women used the patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) pump (77.8% vs. 53.6%, P = 0.0011). They pressed the pump in a significantly shorter time (61.3 ± 41.2 vs. 104.0 ± 105.2 min, P = 0.0015) and for more times (1.9 ± 1.7 vs. 1.2 ± 1.4, P = 0.0022), contributing to significantly more epidural analgesic use (sufentanil: 0.06 ± 0.02 vs. 0.07 ± 0.03 μg/kg/h, P = 0.0150, ropivacaine: 0.11 ± 0.04 vs. 0.14 ± 0.06 mg/kg/h, P = 0.0003, respectively).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that Uyghur women experience labor pain with higher levels of pain and with higher use of epidural analgesics than Han women. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether these differences are clinically relevant.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国汉族和维吾尔族产妇的分娩硬膜外镇痛:一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景:疼痛敏感性和耐受性的差异已被描述过,但在中国,人们对分娩疼痛和分娩体验的差异知之甚少:这项前瞻性观察研究在中国新疆的一家三甲医院进行,研究对象包括两个主要民族:汉族和维吾尔族妇女。研究对象为经阴道分娩并使用硬膜外镇痛的产妇。主要结果是要求进行分娩硬膜外镇痛时的宫颈扩张,并进行了多变量线性回归分析以确定相关变量。次要结果是申请硬膜外镇痛时的疼痛评分和硬膜外镇痛药的使用情况。数据以均数±标准差表示:结果:与汉族妇女相比,维吾尔族妇女在申请分娩硬膜外镇痛时的宫颈扩张度明显较低(1.2 ± 0.7 vs. 0.8 ± 0.6 cm; P = 0.0095),疼痛评分(数字疼痛量表 0-10)明显较高(0.8 ± 1.0 vs. 4.2 ± 1.2; P = 0.0002)。在多变量模型中,维吾尔族妇女的宫颈扩张率较低(P = 0.0392),疼痛评分较高(P 结论:维吾尔族妇女的宫颈扩张率和疼痛评分均高于汉族妇女:我们的研究结果表明,与汉族妇女相比,维吾尔族妇女分娩时的疼痛程度更高,使用硬膜外镇痛药的次数也更多。还需要进一步的研究来评估这些差异是否与临床相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient. • Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered. • The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia. • Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome. The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence-created personal statements compared with applicant-written personal statements: a survey of obstetric anesthesia fellowship program directors in the United States Patients’ perspectives on pain relief during childbirth and labor epidurals: A pilot qualitative study among women who chose to deliver without neuraxial labor analgesia Inhaled epoprostenol via high-flow nasal cannula and intravenous treprostinil for management of severe pulmonary arterial hypertension during cesarean delivery with epidural anesthesia: a case report Accuracy of Spanish and English-generated ChatGPT responses to commonly asked patient questions about labor epidurals: a survey-based study among bilingual obstetric anesthesia experts Labor epidural analgesia among Han and Uyghur parturients: a prospective observational study in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1