Xiaoqian Deng , Xueyu Zhang , Junyu Yan , Ruhui Liu , Yun Shi
{"title":"Labor epidural analgesia among Han and Uyghur parturients: a prospective observational study in China","authors":"Xiaoqian Deng , Xueyu Zhang , Junyu Yan , Ruhui Liu , Yun Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2024.104291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Disparities in pain sensitivity and tolerance have been described, however little is known about variability in the experience of labor pain and childbirth in China.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Xinjiang, China with two major ethnic groups: Han and Uyghur women. Women with a vaginal delivery with labor epidural analgesia were enrolled. The primary outcome was cervical dilation at labor epidural analgesia request, and multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to determine associated variables. Secondary outcomes were pain score at epidural request and epidural analgesics use. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Cervical dilatation at labor epidural analgesia request was significantly lower (1.2 ± 0.7 vs. 0.8 ± 0.6 cm; p = 0.0095), and pain score (numerical pain scale 0–10) was significantly higher (0.8 ± 1.0 vs. 4.2 ± 1.2; <em>P</em> = 0.0002) among Uyghur compared to Han women. In the multivariate model, Uyghur women had a lower cervical dilation (p = 0.0392) and a higher pain score (<em>P</em> <0.0001) at epidural request. During the labor process, a larger proportion of Uyghur women used the patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) pump (77.8% vs. 53.6%, <em>P</em> = 0.0011). They pressed the pump in a significantly shorter time (61.3 ± 41.2 vs. 104.0 ± 105.2 min, <em>P</em> = 0.0015) and for more times (1.9 ± 1.7 vs. 1.2 ± 1.4, <em>P</em> = 0.0022), contributing to significantly more epidural analgesic use (sufentanil: 0.06 ± 0.02 vs. 0.07 ± 0.03 μg/kg/h, <em>P</em> = 0.0150, ropivacaine: 0.11 ± 0.04 vs. 0.14 ± 0.06 mg/kg/h, <em>P</em> = 0.0003, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings suggest that Uyghur women experience labor pain with higher levels of pain and with higher use of epidural analgesics than Han women. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether these differences are clinically relevant.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 104291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X24003030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Disparities in pain sensitivity and tolerance have been described, however little is known about variability in the experience of labor pain and childbirth in China.
Methods
This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Xinjiang, China with two major ethnic groups: Han and Uyghur women. Women with a vaginal delivery with labor epidural analgesia were enrolled. The primary outcome was cervical dilation at labor epidural analgesia request, and multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to determine associated variables. Secondary outcomes were pain score at epidural request and epidural analgesics use. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation.
Results
Cervical dilatation at labor epidural analgesia request was significantly lower (1.2 ± 0.7 vs. 0.8 ± 0.6 cm; p = 0.0095), and pain score (numerical pain scale 0–10) was significantly higher (0.8 ± 1.0 vs. 4.2 ± 1.2; P = 0.0002) among Uyghur compared to Han women. In the multivariate model, Uyghur women had a lower cervical dilation (p = 0.0392) and a higher pain score (P <0.0001) at epidural request. During the labor process, a larger proportion of Uyghur women used the patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) pump (77.8% vs. 53.6%, P = 0.0011). They pressed the pump in a significantly shorter time (61.3 ± 41.2 vs. 104.0 ± 105.2 min, P = 0.0015) and for more times (1.9 ± 1.7 vs. 1.2 ± 1.4, P = 0.0022), contributing to significantly more epidural analgesic use (sufentanil: 0.06 ± 0.02 vs. 0.07 ± 0.03 μg/kg/h, P = 0.0150, ropivacaine: 0.11 ± 0.04 vs. 0.14 ± 0.06 mg/kg/h, P = 0.0003, respectively).
Conclusions
Our findings suggest that Uyghur women experience labor pain with higher levels of pain and with higher use of epidural analgesics than Han women. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether these differences are clinically relevant.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient.
• Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered.
• The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia.
• Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome.
The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.