Comparative analysis of image quality and diagnostic performance among SS-EPI, MS-EPI, and rFOV DWI in bladder cancer.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Japanese Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1007/s11604-024-01694-1
Mitsuru Takeuchi, Atsushi Higaki, Yuichi Kojima, Kentaro Ono, Takuma Maruhisa, Takatoshi Yokoyama, Hiroyuki Watanabe, Akira Yamamoto, Tsutomu Tamada
{"title":"Comparative analysis of image quality and diagnostic performance among SS-EPI, MS-EPI, and rFOV DWI in bladder cancer.","authors":"Mitsuru Takeuchi, Atsushi Higaki, Yuichi Kojima, Kentaro Ono, Takuma Maruhisa, Takatoshi Yokoyama, Hiroyuki Watanabe, Akira Yamamoto, Tsutomu Tamada","doi":"10.1007/s11604-024-01694-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare image quality and diagnostic performance among SS-EPI diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), multi-shot (MS) EPI DWI, and reduced field-of-view (rFOV) DWI for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 73 patients with bladder cancer who underwent multiparametric MRI in our referral center between August 2020 and February 2023. Qualitative image assessment was performed in 73; and quantitative assessment was performed in 66 patients with maximum lesion diameter > 10 mm. The diagnostic performance of the imaging finding of muscle invasion was evaluated in 47 patients with pathological confirmation of MIBC. T2-weighted imaging, SS-EPI DWI, MS-EPI DWI, rFOV DWI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging were acquired with 3 T-MRI. Qualitative image assessment was performed by three readers who rated anatomical distortion, clarity of bladder wall, and lesion conspicuity using a four-point scale. Quantitative assessment included calculation of SNR and CNR, and grading of the presence of muscle layer invasion according to the VI-RADS diagnostic criteria. Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test was used to compare qualitative and quantitative image quality. McNemar test and receiver-operating characteristic analysis were used to compare diagnostic performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Anatomical distortion was less in MS-EPI DWI, rFOV DWI, and SS-EPI DWI, in that order with significant difference. Clarity of bladder wall was greater for MS-EPI DWI, SS-EPI DWI, and rFOV DWI, in that order. There were significant differences between any two combinations of the three DWI types, except between SS-EPI DWI and MS-EPI in Reader 1. Lesion conspicuity, diagnostic performance, SNR and CNR were not significantly different among the three DWI types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among the three DWI sequences evaluated, MS-EPI DWI showed the least anatomical distortion and superior bladder wall delineation but no improvement in diagnostic performance for MIBC. MS-EPI DWI may be considered for additional imaging if SS-EPI DWI is of poor quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-024-01694-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare image quality and diagnostic performance among SS-EPI diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), multi-shot (MS) EPI DWI, and reduced field-of-view (rFOV) DWI for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included 73 patients with bladder cancer who underwent multiparametric MRI in our referral center between August 2020 and February 2023. Qualitative image assessment was performed in 73; and quantitative assessment was performed in 66 patients with maximum lesion diameter > 10 mm. The diagnostic performance of the imaging finding of muscle invasion was evaluated in 47 patients with pathological confirmation of MIBC. T2-weighted imaging, SS-EPI DWI, MS-EPI DWI, rFOV DWI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging were acquired with 3 T-MRI. Qualitative image assessment was performed by three readers who rated anatomical distortion, clarity of bladder wall, and lesion conspicuity using a four-point scale. Quantitative assessment included calculation of SNR and CNR, and grading of the presence of muscle layer invasion according to the VI-RADS diagnostic criteria. Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test was used to compare qualitative and quantitative image quality. McNemar test and receiver-operating characteristic analysis were used to compare diagnostic performance.

Results: Anatomical distortion was less in MS-EPI DWI, rFOV DWI, and SS-EPI DWI, in that order with significant difference. Clarity of bladder wall was greater for MS-EPI DWI, SS-EPI DWI, and rFOV DWI, in that order. There were significant differences between any two combinations of the three DWI types, except between SS-EPI DWI and MS-EPI in Reader 1. Lesion conspicuity, diagnostic performance, SNR and CNR were not significantly different among the three DWI types.

Conclusions: Among the three DWI sequences evaluated, MS-EPI DWI showed the least anatomical distortion and superior bladder wall delineation but no improvement in diagnostic performance for MIBC. MS-EPI DWI may be considered for additional imaging if SS-EPI DWI is of poor quality.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
膀胱癌 SS-EPI、MS-EPI 和 rFOV DWI 图像质量和诊断性能的比较分析。
目的:比较SS-EPI弥散加权成像(DWI)、多拍(MS)EPI DWI和缩小视野(rFOV)DWI对肌肉浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)的成像质量和诊断性能:这项回顾性研究纳入了2020年8月至2023年2月期间在本转诊中心接受多参数磁共振成像检查的73例膀胱癌患者。对 73 例患者进行了图像定性评估;对 66 例最大病灶直径大于 10 mm 的患者进行了定量评估。对 47 例病理确诊为 MIBC 的患者进行了肌肉侵犯成像结果的诊断性能评估。用 3 台 T-MRI 采集了 T2 加权成像、SS-EPI DWI、MS-EPI DWI、rFOV DWI 和动态对比增强成像。图像定性评估由三名阅读者进行,他们采用四点评分法对解剖变形、膀胱壁清晰度和病变明显度进行评分。定量评估包括计算信噪比(SNR)和有线信噪比(CNR),并根据 VI-RADS 诊断标准对是否存在肌层侵犯进行分级。Wilcoxon 配对符号秩检验用于比较定性和定量图像质量。McNemar 检验和受体运算特征分析用于比较诊断性能:结果:MS-EPI DWI、rFOV DWI 和 SS-EPI DWI 的解剖变形依次较小,差异显著。膀胱壁的清晰度依次为 MS-EPI DWI、SS-EPI DWI 和 rFOV DWI。除阅读器 1 中的 SS-EPI DWI 和 MS-EPI 外,三种 DWI 的任何两种组合之间均存在明显差异。三种 DWI 类型在病变清晰度、诊断性能、信噪比和 CNR 方面没有明显差异:结论:在评估的三种 DWI 序列中,MS-EPI DWI 显示的解剖失真最小,膀胱壁轮廓更清晰,但对 MIBC 的诊断性能没有改善。如果SS-EPI DWI质量不佳,可考虑使用MS-EPI DWI进行额外成像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Japanese Journal of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.
期刊最新文献
Advancing clinical MRI exams with artificial intelligence: Japan's contributions and future prospects. Comparative analysis of image quality and diagnostic performance among SS-EPI, MS-EPI, and rFOV DWI in bladder cancer. Artificial intelligence in fracture detection on radiographs: a literature review. Contrast-enhanced thin-slice abdominal CT with super-resolution deep learning reconstruction technique: evaluation of image quality and visibility of anatomical structures. Evaluation of nutritional parameters that may be associated with survival in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy: retrospective study conducted in a tertiary pulmonary hospital.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1