Hair-sparing approach versus traditional hair clipping for cerebral spinal fluid shunt procedures: a retrospective comparative study.

Abstract

Objective: Cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) diversion methods, including ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunts, are the standard treatment for hydrocephalus. Hair clipping (HC) has been a routine neurosurgical practice of the great majority of neurosurgeons, due to the perception that this will either decrease the risk of shunt infection or allow for a faster, unimpeded opening and closing of the skin. The benefits of not cutting or clipping hair in terms of normalizing appearance and self-esteem are obvious. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the rate of shunt infection would differ between pediatric patients receiving operation via the hair-sparing (HS) approach versus HC.

Methods: A retrospective single-institution study comparing HS versus HC was conducted on pediatric patients undergoing long-term CSF shunt procedures at the Montreal Children's Hospital between August 2014 and April 2021. The primary outcome measure was shunt infection at 90 days and at long-term follow-up. Inclusion criteria were having at least 18 months of follow-up after long-term CSF shunt procedures, including insertions or revisions of VP shunts, ventriculoatrial shunts, cystoperitoneal shunts, subdural-peritoneal shunts, ventriculosubgaleal shunts, and ventriculosubgaleal reservoirs. Excluded procedures were those involving external ventricular drains, externalized shunts, Omaya reservoirs, endoscopic third ventriculostomies, and lumbar shunts.

Results: There were 434 CSF shunt procedures performed in 226 unique patients; 155 (35.71%) procedures were done using the HS approach versus 279 (64.29%) procedures via HC. At 90 days postoperatively, the infection rate was 1.29% in the HS group and 2.87% in the HC group, with an absolute risk difference of 1.58% (95% CI -1.07% to 4.23%, p = 0.24). At long-term follow-up (mean follow-up: 752 days and 716 days for the HS and HC groups, respectively), the rate of shunt infection remained at 1.29% for the HS group (no new infections) but rose to 4.66% for the HC group, with an absolute risk difference of 3.37% (95% CI 0.33%-6.41%, p = 0.03).

Conclusions: Performing CSF shunt procedures without cutting or clipping any hair has a very low risk of shunt infection, and certainly does not appear to increase the risk of infection (or malfunction) versus the hair removal approach. It is a safe alternative and should be considered due to its esthetic and psychological benefits regarding normalization of appearance and ease of resuming a normal life following shunt surgery.