Five-year clinical outcomes of STEMI patients treated with a pre-specified bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation technique: Final results of the BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT.

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.003
Elisabetta Moscarella, Gianluca Campo, Massimo Leoncini, Salvatore Geraci, Elisa Nicolini, Bernardo Cortese, Bruno Loi, Vincenzo Guiducci, Salvatore Saccà, Attilio Varricchio, Paolo Vicinelli, Gianfranco De Candia, Davide Personeni, Paolo Calabrò, Salvatore Brugaletta, Azeem Latib, Maurizio Tespili, Alfonso Ielasi
{"title":"Five-year clinical outcomes of STEMI patients treated with a pre-specified bioresorbable vascular scaffold implantation technique: Final results of the BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT.","authors":"Elisabetta Moscarella, Gianluca Campo, Massimo Leoncini, Salvatore Geraci, Elisa Nicolini, Bernardo Cortese, Bruno Loi, Vincenzo Guiducci, Salvatore Saccà, Attilio Varricchio, Paolo Vicinelli, Gianfranco De Candia, Davide Personeni, Paolo Calabrò, Salvatore Brugaletta, Azeem Latib, Maurizio Tespili, Alfonso Ielasi","doi":"10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) use in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are limited. Furthermore, Absorb studies including STEMI patients lacked a prespecified implantation technique to optimize BVS deployment. This study examines the 5-year outcomes of BVS in STEMI patients using an optimized implantation strategy and the impact of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT study is a prospective, non-randomized, single-arm multicenter trial (NCT02601781). It involved 505 STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with a predefined BVS implantation protocol. Key endpoints were a 5-year device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR). The study also compared outcomes based on DAPT duration (36 months vs. shorter).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>502 (99.4 %) patients completed the 5-year follow-up. DOCE rate was 2.4 %. ID-TLR, TV-MI, and cardiac death rates were 1.6 %, 0.8 %, and 0.6 %, respectively. No DOCE occurred between three and five years. Scaffold thrombosis (ScT) was 1 %, all occurring within 24 months. Longer-term DAPT significantly reduced DOCE (1.3 % vs. 4.3 %; HR: 0.29; 95 % CI: 0.1-0.9; p = 0.03) driven by a lower rate of TV-MI (0 % vs. 2.2 %; p = 0.018) compared to shorter-term DAPT, as well as ScT (0 % vs 2.7 %, p = 0.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows favorable 5-year outcomes for BVS in selected STEMI patients with an optimized implantation strategy. Prolonged DAPT further improved outcomes, emphasizing its role in reducing adverse events during scaffold resorption. Further research is needed to assess newer-generation bioresorbable devices.</p>","PeriodicalId":47657,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carrev.2024.11.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Data on Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) use in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) are limited. Furthermore, Absorb studies including STEMI patients lacked a prespecified implantation technique to optimize BVS deployment. This study examines the 5-year outcomes of BVS in STEMI patients using an optimized implantation strategy and the impact of prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT).

Methods: The BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT study is a prospective, non-randomized, single-arm multicenter trial (NCT02601781). It involved 505 STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with a predefined BVS implantation protocol. Key endpoints were a 5-year device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction (TV-MI), and ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (ID-TLR). The study also compared outcomes based on DAPT duration (36 months vs. shorter).

Results: 502 (99.4 %) patients completed the 5-year follow-up. DOCE rate was 2.4 %. ID-TLR, TV-MI, and cardiac death rates were 1.6 %, 0.8 %, and 0.6 %, respectively. No DOCE occurred between three and five years. Scaffold thrombosis (ScT) was 1 %, all occurring within 24 months. Longer-term DAPT significantly reduced DOCE (1.3 % vs. 4.3 %; HR: 0.29; 95 % CI: 0.1-0.9; p = 0.03) driven by a lower rate of TV-MI (0 % vs. 2.2 %; p = 0.018) compared to shorter-term DAPT, as well as ScT (0 % vs 2.7 %, p = 0.007).

Conclusions: This study shows favorable 5-year outcomes for BVS in selected STEMI patients with an optimized implantation strategy. Prolonged DAPT further improved outcomes, emphasizing its role in reducing adverse events during scaffold resorption. Further research is needed to assess newer-generation bioresorbable devices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用预先指定的生物可吸收血管支架植入技术治疗 STEMI 患者的五年临床疗效:BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT 的最终结果。
背景:在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者中使用Absorb生物可吸收血管支架(BVS)的数据有限。此外,包括 STEMI 患者在内的 Absorb 研究缺乏用于优化 BVS 部署的预设植入技术。本研究探讨了 STEMI 患者使用优化植入策略的 BVS 5 年疗效以及延长双联抗血小板疗法(DAPT)的影响:BVS STEMI STRATEGY-IT 研究是一项前瞻性、非随机、单臂多中心试验(NCT02601781)。505 名 STEMI 患者接受了预定义 BVS 植入方案的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。关键终点是心源性死亡、靶血管心肌梗死(TV-MI)和缺血驱动靶病变血运重建(ID-TLR)的5年设备导向复合终点(DOCE)。研究还比较了 DAPT 持续时间(36 个月与更短)的结果:502名患者(99.4%)完成了5年随访。DOCE率为2.4%。ID-TLR、TV-MI和心源性死亡发生率分别为1.6%、0.8%和0.6%。三至五年内未发生 DOCE。支架血栓 (ScT) 发生率为 1%,均发生在 24 个月内。与短期DAPT相比,长期DAPT可显著降低DOCE(1.3% vs. 4.3%;HR:0.29;95 % CI:0.1-0.9;p = 0.03),原因是TV-MI(0% vs. 2.2%;p = 0.018)和ScT(0% vs. 2.7%,p = 0.007)发生率较低:本研究显示,在选定的 STEMI 患者中,采用优化植入策略进行 BVS 治疗的 5 年预后良好。延长 DAPT 进一步改善了预后,强调了其在减少支架再吸收期间不良事件方面的作用。评估新一代生物可吸收装置还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
687
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine (CRM) is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to revascularization therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine publishes articles related to preclinical work and molecular interventions, including angiogenesis, cell therapy, pharmacological interventions, restenosis management, and prevention, including experiments conducted in human subjects, in laboratory animals, and in vitro. Specific areas of interest include percutaneous angioplasty in coronary and peripheral arteries, intervention in structural heart disease, cardiovascular surgery, etc.
期刊最新文献
Inconsistencies with reported point estimates and adjusted odds ratios. Effect of cardiac amyloidosis on outcomes in transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis. Trends in surgical and transcatheter interventions for tricuspid regurgitation: A national inpatient sample analysis from 2011 to 2020. Young adults with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the Houston Methodist Young ACS-PCI Registry. ST-elevation myocardial infarction from spontaneous coronary artery dissection with high thrombus burden.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1