Innovative diagnostic technologies: navigating regulatory frameworks through advances, challenges, and future prospects

IF 24.1 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Lancet Digital Health Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00242-5
Jesus Rodriguez-Manzano PhD , Sumithra Subramaniam PhD , Chibuzor Uchea PhD , Katarzyna M Szostak-Lipowicz PhD , Jane Freeman PhD , Marcus Rauch PhD , Prof Halidou Tinto PhD , Prof Heather J Zar MD , Prof Umberto D'Alessandro MD , Prof Alison H Holmes MD , Prof Gordon A Awandare PhD
{"title":"Innovative diagnostic technologies: navigating regulatory frameworks through advances, challenges, and future prospects","authors":"Jesus Rodriguez-Manzano PhD ,&nbsp;Sumithra Subramaniam PhD ,&nbsp;Chibuzor Uchea PhD ,&nbsp;Katarzyna M Szostak-Lipowicz PhD ,&nbsp;Jane Freeman PhD ,&nbsp;Marcus Rauch PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Halidou Tinto PhD ,&nbsp;Prof Heather J Zar MD ,&nbsp;Prof Umberto D'Alessandro MD ,&nbsp;Prof Alison H Holmes MD ,&nbsp;Prof Gordon A Awandare PhD","doi":"10.1016/S2589-7500(24)00242-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Diagnostic tools are key to guiding patient management and informing public health policies to control infectious diseases. However, many diseases still do not have effective diagnostics and much of the global population faces restricted access to reliable, affordable testing. This limitation underscores the urgent need for innovation to enhance diagnostic availability and effectiveness. Developing diagnostics presents distinct challenges, especially for innovators and regulators. Unlike medicines, regulatory pathways for diagnostics are often less defined and more complex due to their diverse risk profiles and wide range of products. These challenges are amplified in low-income and middle-income countries, which often do not have regulatory frameworks for this specific purpose. In the UK, initiatives aim to support innovation by providing clearer regulatory pathways and ensuring that diagnostics are safe and effective. Regulators are also collaborating internationally to expedite diagnostics for high-need regions. Harmonised standards, regulatory frameworks, and approval processes are essential to ensure consistent quality and safety across regions and facilitate faster development and global access. This Series paper explores the regulatory challenges in infectious disease and antimicrobial resistance diagnostics, focusing on the UK's response and the broader global efforts to address these issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48534,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Digital Health","volume":"6 12","pages":"Pages e934-e943"},"PeriodicalIF":24.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Digital Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589750024002425","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diagnostic tools are key to guiding patient management and informing public health policies to control infectious diseases. However, many diseases still do not have effective diagnostics and much of the global population faces restricted access to reliable, affordable testing. This limitation underscores the urgent need for innovation to enhance diagnostic availability and effectiveness. Developing diagnostics presents distinct challenges, especially for innovators and regulators. Unlike medicines, regulatory pathways for diagnostics are often less defined and more complex due to their diverse risk profiles and wide range of products. These challenges are amplified in low-income and middle-income countries, which often do not have regulatory frameworks for this specific purpose. In the UK, initiatives aim to support innovation by providing clearer regulatory pathways and ensuring that diagnostics are safe and effective. Regulators are also collaborating internationally to expedite diagnostics for high-need regions. Harmonised standards, regulatory frameworks, and approval processes are essential to ensure consistent quality and safety across regions and facilitate faster development and global access. This Series paper explores the regulatory challenges in infectious disease and antimicrobial resistance diagnostics, focusing on the UK's response and the broader global efforts to address these issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创新诊断技术:通过进步、挑战和未来前景驾驭监管框架。
诊断工具是指导病人管理和为控制传染病的公共卫生政策提供信息的关键。然而,许多疾病仍然没有有效的诊断方法,全球大部分人口难以获得可靠、负担得起的检测。这种限制凸显了创新的迫切需要,以提高诊断的可用性和有效性。开发诊断技术面临着独特的挑战,尤其是对创新者和监管者而言。与药品不同,诊断产品的监管途径往往不太明确,而且由于其风险特征各异、产品种类繁多而更加复杂。这些挑战在低收入和中等收入国家更为严峻,因为这些国家往往没有针对这一特定目的的监管框架。在英国,相关举措旨在通过提供更清晰的监管途径来支持创新,并确保诊断产品安全有效。监管机构也在开展国际合作,以加快高需求地区的诊断工作。统一的标准、监管框架和审批流程对于确保各地区质量和安全性的一致性、促进更快的开发和全球普及至关重要。本系列文件探讨了传染病和抗菌药耐药性诊断方面的监管挑战,重点介绍了英国的应对措施以及全球为解决这些问题所做的广泛努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
232
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Lancet Digital Health publishes important, innovative, and practice-changing research on any topic connected with digital technology in clinical medicine, public health, and global health. The journal’s open access content crosses subject boundaries, building bridges between health professionals and researchers.By bringing together the most important advances in this multidisciplinary field,The Lancet Digital Health is the most prominent publishing venue in digital health. We publish a range of content types including Articles,Review, Comment, and Correspondence, contributing to promoting digital technologies in health practice worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Correction to Lancet Digital Health 2026; 100956. Interpreting the GRACE 3.0 ITE model: from predictive performance to clinical decision utility. Interpreting the GRACE 3.0 ITE model: from predictive performance to clinical decision utility. Bridging the gap: aligning clinical decision support regulation with clinical practice in the era of artificial intelligence. A practical framework for operationalising responsible and equitable artificial intelligence in health care: tackling bias, inequity, and implementation challenges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1