Evidence-based Cesarean Delivery: Intraoperative management following placental delivery until skin closure (Part 9): Evidence based care during cesarean delivery.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101548
A D Mackeen, M V Sullivan, V Berghella
{"title":"Evidence-based Cesarean Delivery: Intraoperative management following placental delivery until skin closure (Part 9): Evidence based care during cesarean delivery.","authors":"A D Mackeen, M V Sullivan, V Berghella","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This expert review provides recommendations for the cesarean technique after placental delivery to skin closure. Following placental delivery during cesarean, sponge curettage may be omitted as it has not been shown to decrease the risk of retained products of conception. Uterine irrigation and mechanical cervical dilation cannot be recommended. Either intra-abdominal or extra-abdominal repair of the hysterotomy is acceptable with some possible benefits with decreased postoperative pain and nausea/vomiting with intra-abdominal repair. There is insufficient evidence to recommend one uterine closure technique over the other with regards to suture type, continuous versus interrupted, locking or non-locking, one versus two-layer closure. Double layer uterine closure has been shown to be more beneficial with regards to residual myometrial thickness and full thickness bites (including endometrium) should be considered. Glove change by the surgical team is recommended after placental delivery and prior to closure of the abdominal wall. The following techniques are not recommended: intra-abdominal irrigation, use of adhesion-prevention barriers, peritoneal closure, and rectus muscle re-approximation. Based on non-cesarean evidence, fascial closure bites should be at least 5 × 5 mm with monofilament suture for vertical incisions. As an adjunct to postoperative pain control, surgeons may consider wound infiltration with local anesthesia either supra- or sub-fascial. Prior to closure, subcutaneous irrigation may be performed with saline, and routine use of subcutaneous drains is not recommended. Though closure of the subcutaneous layer can be considered in all patients, it should occur when the depth is ≥ 2cm. A monofilament absorbable suture, such as poliglecaprone, should be used to close the CD skin incision. There is no level 1 evidence evaluating the potential benefit of additional skin adhesive or sterile strips after suture skin closure. If a dressing is preferred over the skin incision the following may be considered: a DACC-impregnated dressing if available, otherwise a standard gauze dressing is appropriate. Prophylactic negative pressure would therapy can be considered in patients with obesity. Vaginal seeding at CD is not recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101548"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101548","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This expert review provides recommendations for the cesarean technique after placental delivery to skin closure. Following placental delivery during cesarean, sponge curettage may be omitted as it has not been shown to decrease the risk of retained products of conception. Uterine irrigation and mechanical cervical dilation cannot be recommended. Either intra-abdominal or extra-abdominal repair of the hysterotomy is acceptable with some possible benefits with decreased postoperative pain and nausea/vomiting with intra-abdominal repair. There is insufficient evidence to recommend one uterine closure technique over the other with regards to suture type, continuous versus interrupted, locking or non-locking, one versus two-layer closure. Double layer uterine closure has been shown to be more beneficial with regards to residual myometrial thickness and full thickness bites (including endometrium) should be considered. Glove change by the surgical team is recommended after placental delivery and prior to closure of the abdominal wall. The following techniques are not recommended: intra-abdominal irrigation, use of adhesion-prevention barriers, peritoneal closure, and rectus muscle re-approximation. Based on non-cesarean evidence, fascial closure bites should be at least 5 × 5 mm with monofilament suture for vertical incisions. As an adjunct to postoperative pain control, surgeons may consider wound infiltration with local anesthesia either supra- or sub-fascial. Prior to closure, subcutaneous irrigation may be performed with saline, and routine use of subcutaneous drains is not recommended. Though closure of the subcutaneous layer can be considered in all patients, it should occur when the depth is ≥ 2cm. A monofilament absorbable suture, such as poliglecaprone, should be used to close the CD skin incision. There is no level 1 evidence evaluating the potential benefit of additional skin adhesive or sterile strips after suture skin closure. If a dressing is preferred over the skin incision the following may be considered: a DACC-impregnated dressing if available, otherwise a standard gauze dressing is appropriate. Prophylactic negative pressure would therapy can be considered in patients with obesity. Vaginal seeding at CD is not recommended.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循证剖宫产:胎盘娩出后至皮肤闭合前的术中管理(第 9 部分):剖宫产期间的循证护理。
本专家综述就胎盘娩出至皮肤闭合后的剖宫产技术提出了建议。在剖宫产术中胎盘娩出后,可以不进行海绵刮宫术,因为没有证据表明它能降低受孕产物残留的风险。不建议进行子宫冲洗和机械性宫颈扩张。腹腔内或腹腔外修复子宫切口都是可以接受的,腹腔内修复可能会减少术后疼痛和恶心/呕吐。在缝合方式、连续缝合与间断缝合、锁定缝合与非锁定缝合、单层缝合与双层缝合等方面,目前还没有足够的证据来推荐一种子宫闭合技术。双层子宫闭合术对残留的子宫肌层厚度更有利,应考虑全层咬合(包括子宫内膜)。建议手术团队在胎盘娩出后和关闭腹壁前更换手套。不建议使用以下技术:腹腔内冲洗、使用预防粘连屏障、腹膜闭合和直肌再贴合。根据非剖腹产的证据,垂直切口的筋膜闭合咬合至少应为 5 × 5 毫米,采用单丝缝合。作为术后疼痛控制的辅助手段,外科医生可以考虑在伤口上或筋膜下浸润局部麻醉。在缝合之前,可以用生理盐水进行皮下冲洗,但不建议常规使用皮下引流管。虽然所有患者都可以考虑关闭皮下层,但应在深度≥ 2 厘米时进行。应使用单丝可吸收缝线(如 poliglecaprone)缝合 CD 皮肤切口。目前还没有 1 级证据评估在缝合皮肤切口后使用额外的皮肤粘合剂或无菌条的潜在益处。如果希望在皮肤切口上使用敷料,可以考虑使用以下敷料:如果有 DACC 浸渍敷料,则使用标准纱布敷料。肥胖患者可考虑预防性负压疗法。不建议在 CD 处进行阴道播种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
期刊最新文献
PPROM in the late preterm period: an argument for expectant management. The effectiveness of ultrasound-indicated cerclage for the reduction of extreme preterm birth in twin pregnancies with a short cervix: a systematic review and meta-analysis: Short title: Effectiveness of cerclage in twin pregnancies with a short cervix. Vaginal progesterone for prevention of preterm birth in women with a history of preterm birth regardless of cervical length: an argument against use. "Inpatient pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in the antepartum period: an argument for universal thromboprophylaxis". Comparative effectiveness of Low Molecular Weight Heparin on Live birth for Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion: systematic review and network meta-analysis: Effectiveness of LMWH on Live Birth in RSA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1