Sequential Grafting of the Left Internal Thoracic Artery to the Left Anterior Descending Artery and Graft Failure

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.11.009
Jordan Leith BS , Kevin R. An MD, MPH , Lamia Harik MD, MSc , Michele Dell’Aquila BS , Camilla Sofia Rossi MD , Gianmarco Cancelli MD , Giovanni Soletti Jr. MD , Stephen E. Fremes MD, MSc , David L. Hare MBBS, DPM , Alexander Kulik MD , Andre Lamy MD , Marc Ruel MD, MPH , Joyce Peper PhD, MSc , Jurrien M. ten Berg MD, PhD , Laura M. Willemsen MD, PhD , Qiang Zhao MD, PhD , Yunpeng Zhu MD , John H. Alexander MD , Daniel M. Wojdyla MS , C. Michael Gibson MD, MS , Mario Gaudino MD, PhD
{"title":"Sequential Grafting of the Left Internal Thoracic Artery to the Left Anterior Descending Artery and Graft Failure","authors":"Jordan Leith BS ,&nbsp;Kevin R. An MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Lamia Harik MD, MSc ,&nbsp;Michele Dell’Aquila BS ,&nbsp;Camilla Sofia Rossi MD ,&nbsp;Gianmarco Cancelli MD ,&nbsp;Giovanni Soletti Jr. MD ,&nbsp;Stephen E. Fremes MD, MSc ,&nbsp;David L. Hare MBBS, DPM ,&nbsp;Alexander Kulik MD ,&nbsp;Andre Lamy MD ,&nbsp;Marc Ruel MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Joyce Peper PhD, MSc ,&nbsp;Jurrien M. ten Berg MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Laura M. Willemsen MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Qiang Zhao MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yunpeng Zhu MD ,&nbsp;John H. Alexander MD ,&nbsp;Daniel M. Wojdyla MS ,&nbsp;C. Michael Gibson MD, MS ,&nbsp;Mario Gaudino MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.11.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is concern that left internal thoracic artery (LITA)–to diagonal (D)–to left anterior descending artery (LAD) grafts may be more susceptible to failure compared with single LITA-LAD grafts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Pooled individual patient data from 8 clinical trials with systematic graft imaging were analyzed to assess the incidence of sequential LITA-D-LAD vs single LITA-LAD grafts. Mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for patient characteristics and clustering within trials, was used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 3969 patients with LITA-LAD grafts, 283 patients (7.1%) received sequential LITA-D-LAD grafts. Patients with sequential LITA-D-LAD grafts were older (66 vs 65 years, <em>P</em> = .009) and more often men (88% vs 83%, <em>P</em> = .03). Overall, graft failure occurred in 9.3% of patients with LITA-LAD grafts, with more graft failure occurring in single (9.5%) than in sequential LITA-D-LAD grafts (6.4%, <em>P</em> = .08) at a median time to imaging of 1.0 years (interquartile range, 1.0-1.1 years). After multivariable adjustment, sequential LITA-D-LAD grafting was not associated with graft failure (adjusted odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.68-2.18; <em>P</em> = .55). There was no difference between groups in mortality (2.8% vs 5.3%, <em>P</em> = .06), myocardial infarction (1.4% vs 1.6%, <em>P</em> = .90), revascularization (4.5% vs 7.3%, <em>P</em> = .08), or stroke (1.7% vs 1.2%, <em>P</em> = .40).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In selected patients, LITA-D-LAD grafting was not associated with higher risk of graft failure or adverse clinical events at 1 year.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":"119 4","pages":"Pages 835-841"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003497524009597","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is concern that left internal thoracic artery (LITA)–to diagonal (D)–to left anterior descending artery (LAD) grafts may be more susceptible to failure compared with single LITA-LAD grafts.

Methods

Pooled individual patient data from 8 clinical trials with systematic graft imaging were analyzed to assess the incidence of sequential LITA-D-LAD vs single LITA-LAD grafts. Mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for patient characteristics and clustering within trials, was used.

Results

Of 3969 patients with LITA-LAD grafts, 283 patients (7.1%) received sequential LITA-D-LAD grafts. Patients with sequential LITA-D-LAD grafts were older (66 vs 65 years, P = .009) and more often men (88% vs 83%, P = .03). Overall, graft failure occurred in 9.3% of patients with LITA-LAD grafts, with more graft failure occurring in single (9.5%) than in sequential LITA-D-LAD grafts (6.4%, P = .08) at a median time to imaging of 1.0 years (interquartile range, 1.0-1.1 years). After multivariable adjustment, sequential LITA-D-LAD grafting was not associated with graft failure (adjusted odds ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.68-2.18; P = .55). There was no difference between groups in mortality (2.8% vs 5.3%, P = .06), myocardial infarction (1.4% vs 1.6%, P = .90), revascularization (4.5% vs 7.3%, P = .08), or stroke (1.7% vs 1.2%, P = .40).

Conclusions

In selected patients, LITA-D-LAD grafting was not associated with higher risk of graft failure or adverse clinical events at 1 year.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从左胸内动脉到左前降支动脉的顺序移植和移植失败。
背景:与单一 LITA-LAD 移植物相比,左胸内动脉 (LITA) 对角线至左前降支动脉 (LAD) 移植物可能更容易失败:方法: 分析了八项具有系统移植物成像的临床试验中汇总的单个患者数据,以评估LITA-对角线-LAD顺序移植物与单一LITA-LAD移植物的发生率。采用混合效应多变量逻辑回归,对患者特征和试验内的聚类进行调整:结果:在3969名接受LITA-LAD移植物治疗的患者中,283名(7.1%)患者接受了LITA-对角线-LAD连续移植物治疗。接受LITA-LAD对角线连续移植的患者年龄较大(66岁对65岁,P=0.009),男性较多(88%对83%,P=0.03)。总体而言,9.3%的LITA-LAD移植物患者发生了移植物失败,在中位(第25-75百分位数)成像时间为1.0(1.0-1.1)年时,单次(9.5%)LITA-对角线-LAD连续移植物(6.4%,P=0.08)发生移植物失败的比例高于连续移植物(6.4%,P=0.08)。经多变量调整后,LITA-对角线-LAD 顺序移植与移植失败无关(调整后的几率比:1.22,95% 置信区间:0.68-2.18,P=0.55)。各组之间的死亡率(2.8% vs. 5.3%,P=0.06)、心肌梗死(1.4% vs. 1.6%,P=0.90)、血管再通(4.5% vs. 7.3%,P=0.08)或中风(1.7% vs. 1.2%,P=0.40)没有差异:结论:在选定的患者中,LITA-对角线-LAD移植术与移植失败或一年后不良临床事件的较高风险无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1235
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features: • Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques • New Technology articles • Case reports • "How-to-do-it" features • Reviews of current literature • Supplements on symposia • Commentary pieces and correspondence • CME • Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery. An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Transcatheter vs Surgical Tricuspid Valve Repair: An Analysis of Medicare Beneficiaries. Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With or Without Mitral Valve Repair for Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation. Results of a Preoperative Screening Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol in Neonates Undergoing Cardiopulmonary Bypass. Mechanical atrioventricular valve replacement during and after the single ventricle palliation. Successful Atrioventricular Valve Repair Modifies Clinical Outcomes in Single Ventricle Patients: Multistate Model Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1