Hanshan Zhang, Yongxiang Li, Xuemeng Xu, Wenji Wei, Hai Hao Song, Kun Shang
{"title":"Research on Fluidizing of Swirling Transport of Bulk Grain Based on Gas–Solid Coupled Bin Pump","authors":"Hanshan Zhang, Yongxiang Li, Xuemeng Xu, Wenji Wei, Hai Hao Song, Kun Shang","doi":"10.1111/jfpe.14750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>To improve the fluidization state of bulk grain in the bin pump in the conveying process, save the time of sending material and improve the conveying efficiency. Add the swirling device at the inlet of the bin pump, and use computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to simulate the key parts of the axial flow pneumatic conveying bulk grain particle system and the bin pump to introduce the swirling technology bin pump. Comparison of the two under the same conditions swirling pneumatic conveying pressure of 0.25MPa, 0.3MPa and 0.35MPa when the material length of 13s, 10s, 8s, respectively, compared with the axial conveying material speed were increased by 18.6%, 28.9%, 20.1%; from the inlet of the lead pipe to the exit of the pressure was reduced by 94.58%, 94.55% and 94.65%; the inlet and the outlet of the pressure were reduced by 94.65%; the inlet and the outlet of the pump were reduced by 94.58% and 94.55%, respectively. 94.65%; the gas-solid two-phase velocity at the inlet and outlet were improved compared with axial pneumatic conveying, in which the gas-phase velocity at the inlet was increased by 81.4% on average, the gas-phase velocity at the outlet was increased by 67.6% on average, the particle velocity at the inlet was increased by 28.9% on average, and the particle velocity at the outlet was increased by 29.2% on average. Through the experiments to compare the two conveying methods, in 0.25MPa, 0.30MPa and 0.35MPa three different pressures under the time used to send material. Swirling pneumatic conveying material speed increased by 19.5%, 30.1%, 23.9%, respectively, the swirling pneumatic conveying material rate is higher than the axial flow pneumatic conveying and the material process is stable.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15932,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","volume":"47 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Process Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfpe.14750","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To improve the fluidization state of bulk grain in the bin pump in the conveying process, save the time of sending material and improve the conveying efficiency. Add the swirling device at the inlet of the bin pump, and use computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to simulate the key parts of the axial flow pneumatic conveying bulk grain particle system and the bin pump to introduce the swirling technology bin pump. Comparison of the two under the same conditions swirling pneumatic conveying pressure of 0.25MPa, 0.3MPa and 0.35MPa when the material length of 13s, 10s, 8s, respectively, compared with the axial conveying material speed were increased by 18.6%, 28.9%, 20.1%; from the inlet of the lead pipe to the exit of the pressure was reduced by 94.58%, 94.55% and 94.65%; the inlet and the outlet of the pressure were reduced by 94.65%; the inlet and the outlet of the pump were reduced by 94.58% and 94.55%, respectively. 94.65%; the gas-solid two-phase velocity at the inlet and outlet were improved compared with axial pneumatic conveying, in which the gas-phase velocity at the inlet was increased by 81.4% on average, the gas-phase velocity at the outlet was increased by 67.6% on average, the particle velocity at the inlet was increased by 28.9% on average, and the particle velocity at the outlet was increased by 29.2% on average. Through the experiments to compare the two conveying methods, in 0.25MPa, 0.30MPa and 0.35MPa three different pressures under the time used to send material. Swirling pneumatic conveying material speed increased by 19.5%, 30.1%, 23.9%, respectively, the swirling pneumatic conveying material rate is higher than the axial flow pneumatic conveying and the material process is stable.
期刊介绍:
This international research journal focuses on the engineering aspects of post-production handling, storage, processing, packaging, and distribution of food. Read by researchers, food and chemical engineers, and industry experts, this is the only international journal specifically devoted to the engineering aspects of food processing. Co-Editors M. Elena Castell-Perez and Rosana Moreira, both of Texas A&M University, welcome papers covering the best original research on applications of engineering principles and concepts to food and food processes.