We Can All 3MT: Student Science Communication Workshop on Quick and Effective Talks

Sandra Klemet-N'Guessan, Abigail Kreuser
{"title":"We Can All 3MT: Student Science Communication Workshop on Quick and Effective Talks","authors":"Sandra Klemet-N'Guessan,&nbsp;Abigail Kreuser","doi":"10.1002/lob.10670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Scientific presentations at large conferences are often constrained to 12 minutes or less, with formats like lightning talks calling researchers to summarize their work in just 3–5 minutes. One popular short-form presentation is the Three-Minute Thesis (3MT) competition, where graduate students distill their thesis into a compelling 3-minute talk, accompanied by a single static slide, and aimed at a non-specialist audience. Launched in 2008 at the University of Queensland, Australia, 3MT competitions are now hosted by research institutions worldwide, often offering opportunities for top contenders to compete at regional, national, and international levels. While the 3MT format helps students refine their communication skills with non-specialists, its value goes beyond the competition. Scientists are frequently called upon to explain their work in a condensed and accessible way to diverse interlocutors, even within their own disciplines.</p><p>Early in 2024, the ASLO student committee invited Sandra Klemet-N'Guessan to lead a 3MT workshop at the 2024 ASLO Aquatic Science Meeting in Madison, Wisconsin, USA, given her expertise in the area. Sandra is a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Waterloo, where she is exploring wise practices for Indigenous data governance in peatlands. Sandra has been an active science communicator since 2020 and has presented, moderated, and mentored at over 15 seminars and conferences and 25 science outreach events. Sandra was also the 2023 Runner-Up Prize winner of Trent University's 3MT competition.</p><p>This workshop guided participants in learning and applying tools for delivering quick and effective talks, with the goal of drafting a 3MT presentation by the end (Fig. 1).</p><p>The workshop discussion began with the question, “What is science communication and why is it important?” Sixty-five percent of participants emphasized the importance of engaging with non-specialists, while only 15% mentioned communication with fellow scientists (Fig. 2). Half of the participants noted that effective science communication can enhance the impact and relevance of research, making its contributions to the broader community more meaningful (Fig. 2). More than half of the participants (55%) identified access to knowledge as a key goal of science communication, viewing it as both a right and a fundamental aspect of our shared humanity (Fig. 2).</p><p>Overall, participants defined science communication as the ability to share the scientific process and findings with non-specialists—those outside one's specific field or without a scientific background—in a manner that is accessible, inclusive, meaningful, and adaptable to diverse interlocutors. Participants and Sandra agreed that science communication plays a crucial role in enhancing scientific literacy by helping individuals understand the relevance of scientific research in their everyday lives. This enhanced understanding, in turn, fosters meaningful engagement between specialists and non-specialists, and galvanizes individuals to take action to address societal challenges. However, despite the variety of interlocutors and purposes of science communication, there is a notable gap in training for effectively communicating research to these diverse groups, particularly at the graduate and early career levels.</p><p>Following this discussion, Sandra introduced several opportunities for students to engage in and develop their science communication skills, including the 3MT competition, Soapbox Science, and ComSciCon. To demonstrate the structure of a 3MT presentation, she shared two examples of background and title slides she had used during her participation at two 3MT competitions at her institution. Participants were then encouraged to form small groups, seated in circles, and introduce themselves in 30 seconds to their fellow group members.</p><p>Our second discussion question asked: “According to you, what makes a good presentation?” The key elements of a good presentation centered around the delivery style and the media used to convey the message (Fig. 3). Participants highlighted the importance of clarity, conciseness, simplicity, and accessibility in making a presentation easy to understand. Participants also emphasized that infusing the presentation with passion, energy, and a sense of engagement is critical to capture the audience's attention (Fig. 3). Finally, participants agreed that effective presentations rely on strong visuals—whether pictures, illustrations, diagrams, or figures—that are clear and easy to interpret, enhancing the overall impact of the message (Fig. 3).</p><p>Workshop participants then watched a video by Atia Amin, the winner of a 3MT competition at the 2022 Council of Graduate Schools Annual Meeting (Amin <span>2022</span>) and were asked to identify the key elements of a successful 3MT presentation. Participants noted that Amin was able to clearly communicate the purpose and every step of her research process while using engaging strategies to captivate her audience. The most impactful strategy was her use of storytelling with a circular structure, beginning with a personal experience, introducing a conflict (the research question), and resolving it by returning to where the story started (the research conclusion). This narrative was further enhanced by her use of accessible language, varied vocal pitch, emotional shifts from sadness to joy, purposeful hand gestures, and an effective use of the background slide.</p><p>Following group discussion, Sandra emphasized additional elements essential to delivery style and interlocutor engagement that could further elevate a 3MT presentation. She recommended that presenters stand with energy, confidently occupying the space and making consistent eye contact with the interlocutors. They should speak with volume and at an intelligible pace, ensuring the interlocutors can follow along. Finally, articulating their points with shorter sentences than they might in writing and well-timed pauses can add emphasis and power to key messages.</p><p>Storytelling holds immense power in engaging listeners and making them more open to learning beyond what graphs or statistics can convey. Though often overlooked in academic presentations due to the constraints of the scientific format and the desire for impartiality, storytelling fosters empathy and builds a strong bond between the teller and the listener by triggering the release of oxytocin, which increases trust and openness to persuasion (Barraza and Zak <span>2009</span>; Zak <span>2015</span>). Two key effects of storytelling—transportation, where the audience becomes immersed in the narrative, and identification, where they adopt the perspective of a character—further enhance its power to engage (Gallese and Wojciehowski <span>2011</span>; Gerrig <span>2019</span>). Effective storytelling not only addresses key questions but also speaks to the heart, making the message more relatable and authentic. This authenticity is especially critical in contexts such as applying for graduate fellowships, where a compelling personal narrative can be as important as research proposals for securing funding. Crafting a strong narrative can enhance communication across different formats, whether for a brief elevator pitch or a longer presentation.</p><p>To encourage participants to bring their unique stories and perspectives into their 3MT presentations, we watched an excerpt from Nigerian author Chimamanda Adichie Ngozi's TED talk, <i>The Danger of a Single Story</i> (Adichie <span>2009</span>). In the video, Adichie emphasizes the need for diverse perspectives in storytelling, sharing how her early exposure to British and American literature made her believe that stories had to center on foreign worlds. Discovering African writers later showed her the importance of seeing her own culture reflected in literature. In science communication, it is equally important to move beyond the limited narratives often found in papers or talks, and to avoid mimicking styles that may not resonate with our personal experiences. By embracing diverse voices, particularly from underrepresented backgrounds, we can create more inclusive, authentic, and relatable stories that foster deeper connections and replace stereotypes with empathy and understanding. This approach enriches both the storyteller and the interlocutor, offering a broader, more nuanced view of the world.</p><p>In the final exercise of the workshop, participants were given the opportunity to write their own 3MT, including crafting a title that clearly states the topic of the presentation and grabs attention, and sharing it within their small groups. Afterward, all groups reconvened, and a few volunteers presented either their 3MT titles or drafts of their talks to the larger group. At the end of the workshop, participants were asked to reflect on the most impactful concepts they had learned. Many highlighted the importance of storytelling and the techniques for structuring a narrative to effectively communicate science to their audience as the most valuable takeaways. Others emphasized the significance of effective body language and conveying emotions. However, formal training in these essential presentation skills is not typically available to students.</p><p>Looking ahead, participants expressed interest in future workshops on topics such as scientific writing, crafting an academic CV, designing slides and figures, and strategies for overcoming public speaking anxiety. This feedback highlights a clear demand for comprehensive guidance across various aspects of science communication. Students are seeking support not only in content creation and presentation delivery but also in design, stage presence, and scientific profile marketing. To meet this need, we recommend that ASLO expand its current grant writing course to cover additional aspects of science communication. This would allow students to earn graduate credits while developing oral and written communication skills applicable to academic presentations, scientific publishing, grant and job applications, and outreach activities. The ASLO student committee will also host quarterly webinars to help members improve their science communication across media and for diverse interlocutors. Sandra will kick off the fall series by sharing insights from her recent 3MT workshop, with recordings available on the ASLO website for members. Stay tuned!</p>","PeriodicalId":40008,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin","volume":"33 4","pages":"181-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lob.10670","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lob.10670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific presentations at large conferences are often constrained to 12 minutes or less, with formats like lightning talks calling researchers to summarize their work in just 3–5 minutes. One popular short-form presentation is the Three-Minute Thesis (3MT) competition, where graduate students distill their thesis into a compelling 3-minute talk, accompanied by a single static slide, and aimed at a non-specialist audience. Launched in 2008 at the University of Queensland, Australia, 3MT competitions are now hosted by research institutions worldwide, often offering opportunities for top contenders to compete at regional, national, and international levels. While the 3MT format helps students refine their communication skills with non-specialists, its value goes beyond the competition. Scientists are frequently called upon to explain their work in a condensed and accessible way to diverse interlocutors, even within their own disciplines.

Early in 2024, the ASLO student committee invited Sandra Klemet-N'Guessan to lead a 3MT workshop at the 2024 ASLO Aquatic Science Meeting in Madison, Wisconsin, USA, given her expertise in the area. Sandra is a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Waterloo, where she is exploring wise practices for Indigenous data governance in peatlands. Sandra has been an active science communicator since 2020 and has presented, moderated, and mentored at over 15 seminars and conferences and 25 science outreach events. Sandra was also the 2023 Runner-Up Prize winner of Trent University's 3MT competition.

This workshop guided participants in learning and applying tools for delivering quick and effective talks, with the goal of drafting a 3MT presentation by the end (Fig. 1).

The workshop discussion began with the question, “What is science communication and why is it important?” Sixty-five percent of participants emphasized the importance of engaging with non-specialists, while only 15% mentioned communication with fellow scientists (Fig. 2). Half of the participants noted that effective science communication can enhance the impact and relevance of research, making its contributions to the broader community more meaningful (Fig. 2). More than half of the participants (55%) identified access to knowledge as a key goal of science communication, viewing it as both a right and a fundamental aspect of our shared humanity (Fig. 2).

Overall, participants defined science communication as the ability to share the scientific process and findings with non-specialists—those outside one's specific field or without a scientific background—in a manner that is accessible, inclusive, meaningful, and adaptable to diverse interlocutors. Participants and Sandra agreed that science communication plays a crucial role in enhancing scientific literacy by helping individuals understand the relevance of scientific research in their everyday lives. This enhanced understanding, in turn, fosters meaningful engagement between specialists and non-specialists, and galvanizes individuals to take action to address societal challenges. However, despite the variety of interlocutors and purposes of science communication, there is a notable gap in training for effectively communicating research to these diverse groups, particularly at the graduate and early career levels.

Following this discussion, Sandra introduced several opportunities for students to engage in and develop their science communication skills, including the 3MT competition, Soapbox Science, and ComSciCon. To demonstrate the structure of a 3MT presentation, she shared two examples of background and title slides she had used during her participation at two 3MT competitions at her institution. Participants were then encouraged to form small groups, seated in circles, and introduce themselves in 30 seconds to their fellow group members.

Our second discussion question asked: “According to you, what makes a good presentation?” The key elements of a good presentation centered around the delivery style and the media used to convey the message (Fig. 3). Participants highlighted the importance of clarity, conciseness, simplicity, and accessibility in making a presentation easy to understand. Participants also emphasized that infusing the presentation with passion, energy, and a sense of engagement is critical to capture the audience's attention (Fig. 3). Finally, participants agreed that effective presentations rely on strong visuals—whether pictures, illustrations, diagrams, or figures—that are clear and easy to interpret, enhancing the overall impact of the message (Fig. 3).

Workshop participants then watched a video by Atia Amin, the winner of a 3MT competition at the 2022 Council of Graduate Schools Annual Meeting (Amin 2022) and were asked to identify the key elements of a successful 3MT presentation. Participants noted that Amin was able to clearly communicate the purpose and every step of her research process while using engaging strategies to captivate her audience. The most impactful strategy was her use of storytelling with a circular structure, beginning with a personal experience, introducing a conflict (the research question), and resolving it by returning to where the story started (the research conclusion). This narrative was further enhanced by her use of accessible language, varied vocal pitch, emotional shifts from sadness to joy, purposeful hand gestures, and an effective use of the background slide.

Following group discussion, Sandra emphasized additional elements essential to delivery style and interlocutor engagement that could further elevate a 3MT presentation. She recommended that presenters stand with energy, confidently occupying the space and making consistent eye contact with the interlocutors. They should speak with volume and at an intelligible pace, ensuring the interlocutors can follow along. Finally, articulating their points with shorter sentences than they might in writing and well-timed pauses can add emphasis and power to key messages.

Storytelling holds immense power in engaging listeners and making them more open to learning beyond what graphs or statistics can convey. Though often overlooked in academic presentations due to the constraints of the scientific format and the desire for impartiality, storytelling fosters empathy and builds a strong bond between the teller and the listener by triggering the release of oxytocin, which increases trust and openness to persuasion (Barraza and Zak 2009; Zak 2015). Two key effects of storytelling—transportation, where the audience becomes immersed in the narrative, and identification, where they adopt the perspective of a character—further enhance its power to engage (Gallese and Wojciehowski 2011; Gerrig 2019). Effective storytelling not only addresses key questions but also speaks to the heart, making the message more relatable and authentic. This authenticity is especially critical in contexts such as applying for graduate fellowships, where a compelling personal narrative can be as important as research proposals for securing funding. Crafting a strong narrative can enhance communication across different formats, whether for a brief elevator pitch or a longer presentation.

To encourage participants to bring their unique stories and perspectives into their 3MT presentations, we watched an excerpt from Nigerian author Chimamanda Adichie Ngozi's TED talk, The Danger of a Single Story (Adichie 2009). In the video, Adichie emphasizes the need for diverse perspectives in storytelling, sharing how her early exposure to British and American literature made her believe that stories had to center on foreign worlds. Discovering African writers later showed her the importance of seeing her own culture reflected in literature. In science communication, it is equally important to move beyond the limited narratives often found in papers or talks, and to avoid mimicking styles that may not resonate with our personal experiences. By embracing diverse voices, particularly from underrepresented backgrounds, we can create more inclusive, authentic, and relatable stories that foster deeper connections and replace stereotypes with empathy and understanding. This approach enriches both the storyteller and the interlocutor, offering a broader, more nuanced view of the world.

In the final exercise of the workshop, participants were given the opportunity to write their own 3MT, including crafting a title that clearly states the topic of the presentation and grabs attention, and sharing it within their small groups. Afterward, all groups reconvened, and a few volunteers presented either their 3MT titles or drafts of their talks to the larger group. At the end of the workshop, participants were asked to reflect on the most impactful concepts they had learned. Many highlighted the importance of storytelling and the techniques for structuring a narrative to effectively communicate science to their audience as the most valuable takeaways. Others emphasized the significance of effective body language and conveying emotions. However, formal training in these essential presentation skills is not typically available to students.

Looking ahead, participants expressed interest in future workshops on topics such as scientific writing, crafting an academic CV, designing slides and figures, and strategies for overcoming public speaking anxiety. This feedback highlights a clear demand for comprehensive guidance across various aspects of science communication. Students are seeking support not only in content creation and presentation delivery but also in design, stage presence, and scientific profile marketing. To meet this need, we recommend that ASLO expand its current grant writing course to cover additional aspects of science communication. This would allow students to earn graduate credits while developing oral and written communication skills applicable to academic presentations, scientific publishing, grant and job applications, and outreach activities. The ASLO student committee will also host quarterly webinars to help members improve their science communication across media and for diverse interlocutors. Sandra will kick off the fall series by sharing insights from her recent 3MT workshop, with recordings available on the ASLO website for members. Stay tuned!

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们都能 3MT:学生科学传播快速有效讲座研讨会
大型会议上的科学演讲通常被限制在 12 分钟以内,闪电演讲等形式要求研究人员在 3-5 分钟内总结自己的工作。三分钟论文(3MT)竞赛是一种流行的短篇演讲形式,研究生将自己的论文提炼成引人注目的三分钟演讲,只用一张静态幻灯片,面向非专业听众。3MT 竞赛于 2008 年在澳大利亚昆士兰大学启动,现在由世界各地的研究机构主办,通常为顶尖选手提供参加地区、国家和国际级比赛的机会。虽然 3MT 形式有助于学生提高与非专家的沟通技巧,但其价值并不局限于比赛。2024 年初,鉴于桑德拉-克莱梅特-恩盖桑(Sandra Klemet-N'Guessan)在该领域的专业知识,ASLO 学生委员会邀请她在 2024 年于美国威斯康星州麦迪逊举行的 ASLO 水产科学会议上主持 3MT 研讨会。桑德拉是滑铁卢大学的一名博士后研究员,她正在探索泥炭地土著数据管理的明智做法。自 2020 年以来,桑德拉一直是一名活跃的科学传播者,曾在超过 15 次研讨会和会议以及 25 次科学外联活动中发表演讲、主持和指导。桑德拉还是特伦特大学 3MT 竞赛 2023 年的亚军得主。本次研讨会指导与会者学习和应用快速有效演讲的工具,目标是在研讨会结束时起草一份 3MT 演示文稿(图 1)。65%的与会者强调了与非专家交流的重要性,而只有 15%的与会者提到了与科学家同行交流的重要性(图 2)。半数与会者指出,有效的科学交流可以增强研究的影响力和相关性,使其对更广泛的社会做出更有意义的贡献(图 2)。超过半数的参与者(55%)认为获取知识是科学传播的一个关键目标,认为这既是一种权利,也是我们共同人性的一个基本方面(图 2)。总体而言,参与者将科学传播定义为与非专家--特定领域之外或没有科学背景的人--分享科学过程和研究成果的能力,其方式应具有可及性、包容性、有意义,并能适应不同的对话者。与会者和桑德拉一致认为,科学传播通过帮助人们了解科学研究与日常生活的相关性,在提高科学素养方面发挥着至关重要的作用。这种加深了的理解反过来又促进了专家与非专家之间有意义的接触,并激励个人采取行动应对社会挑战。然而,尽管科学传播的对话者和目的多种多样,但在向这些不同群体有效传播研究成果的培训方面却存在着明显的差距,尤其是在研究生和职业生涯初期。讨论结束后,桑德拉向学生们介绍了几种参与和发展科学传播技能的机会,包括3MT竞赛、Soapbox Science和ComSciCon。为了演示 3MT 演讲的结构,她分享了自己在所在院校参加两次 3MT 竞赛时使用的背景和标题幻灯片的两个示例。然后,我们鼓励与会者组成小组,围成一圈坐下,在 30 秒内向小组成员介绍自己:"我们的第二个讨论问题是:"根据您的观点,怎样才能做一个好的演讲?好的演示的关键要素集中在传递信息的方式和媒介上(图 3)。与会者强调了清晰、简洁、简单和易懂的重要性。与会者还强调,在演讲中注入激情、活力和参与感对于吸引听众的注意力至关重要(图 3)。最后,与会者一致认为,有效的演示有赖于强大的视觉效果--无论是图片、插图、图表还是数字--清晰易懂,从而增强信息的整体影响力(图 3)。研讨会与会者随后观看了 2022 年研究生院理事会年会 3MT 竞赛获奖者 Atia Amin 的视频(Amin 2022),并被要求找出成功的 3MT 演示的关键要素。与会者注意到,阿明能够清楚地传达她的研究目的和研究过程中的每一步,同时使用引人入胜的策略吸引听众。 最有影响力的策略是她使用循环结构讲故事,从个人经历开始,引入冲突(研究问题),然后回到故事开始的地方(研究结论)解决冲突。她使用通俗易懂的语言、不同的声调、从悲伤到喜悦的情绪转换、有目的的手势以及背景幻灯片的有效使用,进一步加强了这种叙述方式。在小组讨论之后,桑德拉强调了演讲风格和对话者参与的其他基本要素,这些要素可以进一步提升 3MT 演讲的水平。她建议演讲者站立时要充满活力,自信地占据空间,并与对话者保持目光接触。演讲者的音量要大,语速要清晰,确保对话者能听懂。最后,用比书面表达更简短的句子和适时的停顿来阐述观点,可以增加关键信息的重点和力量。讲故事在吸引听众方面具有巨大的力量,可以让他们更乐于学习图表或统计数据所能传达的内容。尽管由于科学形式的限制和对公正性的渴望,讲故事在学术报告中常常被忽视,但讲故事可以促进共鸣,并通过触发催产素的释放在讲述者和听众之间建立牢固的纽带,从而增加信任和对说服的开放性(Barraza 和 Zak,2009 年;Zak,2015 年)。讲故事的两个关键效果--传递(听众沉浸在叙事中)和认同(听众采用某个角色的视角)--进一步增强了讲故事的吸引力(Gallese 和 Wojciehowski,2011 年;Gerrig,2019 年)。有效的故事讲述不仅能解决关键问题,还能直击人心,使信息更贴近生活、更真实可信。在申请研究生奖学金等情况下,这种真实性尤为重要,因为在这种情况下,引人入胜的个人叙事与研究提案对于获得资金同样重要。为了鼓励学员将自己独特的故事和观点融入到 3MT 演讲中,我们观看了尼日利亚作家奇玛曼达-阿迪契-恩格齐的 TED 演讲《单一故事的危险》(The Danger of a Single Story,阿迪契,2009 年)的节选。在视频中,阿迪契强调讲故事需要有不同的视角,并分享了她早期接触英美文学时是如何认为故事必须以外国世界为中心的。后来发现非洲作家后,她才知道在文学作品中反映自己文化的重要性。在科学传播中,同样重要的是要超越论文或演讲中常见的有限叙事,避免模仿那些可能与我们的个人经历无共鸣的风格。通过接受不同的声音,特别是来自代表不足背景的声音,我们可以创造出更具包容性、更真实、更贴近生活的故事,从而促进更深层次的联系,并以同情和理解取代刻板印象。在工作坊的最后一项练习中,与会者有机会撰写自己的 3MT 演讲稿,包括拟定一个标题,明确说明演讲主题并吸引注意力,然后在小组内分享。之后,所有小组再次集合,一些志愿者向大伙介绍了他们的 3MT 标题或演讲草稿。研讨会结束时,与会者被要求思考他们学到的最有影响力的概念。许多人强调了讲故事的重要性,以及如何有效地将科学知识传达给听众的叙事结构技巧,认为这是最有价值的收获。还有人强调了有效的肢体语言和传递情感的重要性。展望未来,与会者表示有兴趣参加未来的研讨会,主题包括科学写作、撰写学术简历、设计幻灯片和图表以及克服公开演讲焦虑症的策略。这些反馈凸显了对科学交流各方面综合指导的明确需求。学生们不仅在内容创作和演讲表达方面寻求支持,还在设计、舞台表现力和科学形象营销方面寻求支持。为了满足这一需求,我们建议 ASLO 扩展目前的赠款写作课程,以涵盖科学交流的更多方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin
Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: All past issues of the Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin are available online, including its predecessors Communications to Members and the ASLO Bulletin. Access to the current and previous volume is restricted to members and institutions with a subscription to the ASLO journals. All other issues are freely accessible without a subscription. As part of ASLO’s mission to disseminate and communicate knowledge in the aquatic sciences.
期刊最新文献
Limnology and Oceanography Bulletin Volume 33 Number 4 November 2024 141-191 William (Bill) M. Hamner (1939–2024) Getting Ready for XMAS2025—What You Need to Know Before Arriving in Xiamen Zvy Dubinsky (1934–2024) The 2024 “Hacking Limnology” Workshop Series and Virtual Summit: Increasing Inclusion, Participation, and Representation in the Aquatic Sciences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1