Calibration of TEROS 10 and TEROS 12 electromagnetic soil moisture sensors

Sofia Cominelli, Leonardo D. Rivera, William G. Brown, Tyson E. Ochsner, Andres Patrignani
{"title":"Calibration of TEROS 10 and TEROS 12 electromagnetic soil moisture sensors","authors":"Sofia Cominelli,&nbsp;Leonardo D. Rivera,&nbsp;William G. Brown,&nbsp;Tyson E. Ochsner,&nbsp;Andres Patrignani","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The TEROS 10 and TEROS 12 are widely used capacitance-based sensors for measuring volumetric water content (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>θ</mi>\n <mi>v</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\theta }_v}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>), but few systematic studies of the measurement volume and accuracy of these sensors have been published. The objectives of this study were to (1) calibrate and validate these sensors in mineral soils, (2) determine the sensing volume of each sensor, and (3) evaluate the temperature sensitivity of the sensors. Both sensors were calibrated in the laboratory using columns of packed soil at multiple moisture levels from air-dry to near saturation. Sensors were validated using additional laboratory and field measurements. The sensing volume was determined by quantifying the response of raw sensor outputs while increasing the level of oven-dry sand, moist sand (0.100 cm<sup>3</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup>), or water around the sensor in the radial and axial directions. Temperature sensitivity was tested in controlled conditions over a range of temperatures from 2°C to 40°C using encapsulated sensors in packed soil columns at constant <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>θ</mi>\n <mi>v</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\theta }_{v}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>. Linear calibration models resulted in mean absolute error ≤0.030 cm<sup>3</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup> for both sensors during laboratory and field validations. In moist sand, the sensing volume contributing 95% of the maximum sensor response was 439 cm<sup>3</sup> for the TEROS 10 and 423 cm<sup>3</sup> for the TEROS 12. Both sensors exhibited changes in <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>θ</mi>\n <mi>v</mi>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{\\theta }_v}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> of ≤0.02 cm<sup>3</sup> cm<sup>−3</sup> when subjected to a temperature change from 2°C to 40°C. For the soils considered here, both sensors demonstrated accuracy that is likely sufficient for a variety of agricultural and hydrological applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":"88 6","pages":"2104-2122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20777","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The TEROS 10 and TEROS 12 are widely used capacitance-based sensors for measuring volumetric water content ( θ v ${{\theta }_v}$ ), but few systematic studies of the measurement volume and accuracy of these sensors have been published. The objectives of this study were to (1) calibrate and validate these sensors in mineral soils, (2) determine the sensing volume of each sensor, and (3) evaluate the temperature sensitivity of the sensors. Both sensors were calibrated in the laboratory using columns of packed soil at multiple moisture levels from air-dry to near saturation. Sensors were validated using additional laboratory and field measurements. The sensing volume was determined by quantifying the response of raw sensor outputs while increasing the level of oven-dry sand, moist sand (0.100 cm3 cm−3), or water around the sensor in the radial and axial directions. Temperature sensitivity was tested in controlled conditions over a range of temperatures from 2°C to 40°C using encapsulated sensors in packed soil columns at constant θ v ${{\theta }_{v}}$ . Linear calibration models resulted in mean absolute error ≤0.030 cm3 cm−3 for both sensors during laboratory and field validations. In moist sand, the sensing volume contributing 95% of the maximum sensor response was 439 cm3 for the TEROS 10 and 423 cm3 for the TEROS 12. Both sensors exhibited changes in θ v ${{\theta }_v}$ of ≤0.02 cm3 cm−3 when subjected to a temperature change from 2°C to 40°C. For the soils considered here, both sensors demonstrated accuracy that is likely sufficient for a variety of agricultural and hydrological applications.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
校准 TEROS 10 和 TEROS 12 电磁土壤水分传感器
TEROS 10 和 TEROS 12 是广泛使用的基于电容的传感器,用于测量体积含水量(θ v ${{\theta }_v}$),但有关这些传感器的测量体积和精度的系统研究却鲜有发表。本研究的目标是:(1) 在矿质土壤中校准和验证这些传感器;(2) 确定每个传感器的感应体积;(3) 评估传感器的温度灵敏度。这两种传感器都是在实验室中使用从风干到接近饱和等多个湿度水平的包装土柱进行校准的。此外,还在实验室和实地测量中对传感器进行了验证。在径向和轴向增加传感器周围的干砂、湿砂(0.100 cm3 cm-3)或水时,通过量化传感器原始输出的响应来确定传感量。在恒定 θ v ${{\theta }_{v}}$ 的条件下,使用包装土柱中的封装传感器,在 2°C 至 40°C 的温度范围内,在受控条件下测试了温度灵敏度。在实验室和现场验证过程中,线性校准模型导致两种传感器的平均绝对误差均小于 0.030 cm3 cm-3。在潮湿的沙子中,TEROS 10 传感器最大响应 95% 的感应体积为 439 立方厘米,TEROS 12 传感器为 423 立方厘米。当温度从 2°C 变化到 40°C 时,两个传感器的 θ v ${{\theta }_v}$ 变化均小于 0.02 cm3 cm-3。对于本文所考虑的土壤,这两种传感器都显示出足够的精度,可以满足各种农业和水文应用的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A portable low-cost incubation chamber for real-time characterization of soil respiration Novel slow-release fertilizer promotes nitrogen circularity while increasing soil organic carbon Erratum to: Effects of maize residue and biochar applications on soil δ13C and organic carbon sources in a subtropical paddy rice ecosystem Microbial inocula enhance effects of biochar amendments on crop productivity, soil health, and microbial communities: A meta-analysis Comparison of laser diffractometry and pipetting methods for particle size determination: A pilot study on the implications of result discrepancies on soil classification
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1