What Can Happen When We Look at Art?: An Exploratory Network Model and Latent Profile Analysis of Affective/Cognitive Aspects Underlying Shared, Supraordinate Responses to Museum Visual Art

IF 1.5 4区 心理学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Empirical Studies of the Arts Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1177/02762374241292576
Stephanie Miller, Katherine N. Cotter, Joerg Fingerhut, Helmut Leder, Matthew Pelowski
{"title":"What Can Happen When We Look at Art?: An Exploratory Network Model and Latent Profile Analysis of Affective/Cognitive Aspects Underlying Shared, Supraordinate Responses to Museum Visual Art","authors":"Stephanie Miller, Katherine N. Cotter, Joerg Fingerhut, Helmut Leder, Matthew Pelowski","doi":"10.1177/02762374241292576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Art-viewing is a defining component of society and culture, in part because the experience involves a wide-range and nuanced configuration of emotional and cognitive responses. Precisely because of this complexity, however, questions of the actual nature, scope, and variety of art experience remain largely unanswered: what kinds of patterns do we exhibit, how do various components go together, and can these be distilled into shared experiential outcomes? We introduce an exploratory study based on 345 individuals’ unique experiences with one of three sets of artworks. Experiences were assessed via 46 affective and cognitive items based on a recent model, with individuals reporting to what degree they felt each during their encounter. Network and latent profile analyses revealed five patterns, aligning to a Harmonious, Facile, Transformative, and two Negative outcomes. These largely supported model hypotheses, connected to specific appraisals, and could be found, although with varying probability, across individual viewers and artworks.","PeriodicalId":45870,"journal":{"name":"Empirical Studies of the Arts","volume":"98 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Empirical Studies of the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02762374241292576","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Art-viewing is a defining component of society and culture, in part because the experience involves a wide-range and nuanced configuration of emotional and cognitive responses. Precisely because of this complexity, however, questions of the actual nature, scope, and variety of art experience remain largely unanswered: what kinds of patterns do we exhibit, how do various components go together, and can these be distilled into shared experiential outcomes? We introduce an exploratory study based on 345 individuals’ unique experiences with one of three sets of artworks. Experiences were assessed via 46 affective and cognitive items based on a recent model, with individuals reporting to what degree they felt each during their encounter. Network and latent profile analyses revealed five patterns, aligning to a Harmonious, Facile, Transformative, and two Negative outcomes. These largely supported model hypotheses, connected to specific appraisals, and could be found, although with varying probability, across individual viewers and artworks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当我们欣赏艺术时会发生什么?对博物馆视觉艺术的共同、超协调反应的情感/认知方面的探索性网络模型和潜在特征分析
艺术观赏是社会和文化的一个决定性组成部分,部分原因是这种体验涉及情感和认知反应的广泛而微妙的组合。然而,正是由于这种复杂性,有关艺术体验的实际性质、范围和多样性的问题在很大程度上仍未得到解答:我们会表现出什么样的模式,各种成分是如何结合在一起的,这些是否可以提炼成共同的体验结果?我们介绍了一项基于 345 人对三组艺术作品中的一组作品的独特体验的探索性研究。体验是通过基于最新模型的 46 个情感和认知项目进行评估的,个人报告他们在接触过程中的感受程度。网络和潜在特征分析揭示了五种模式,分别与和谐型、轻松型、变革型和两种消极型结果相一致。这些模式在很大程度上支持了模型假设,与特定的评价相联系,并且可以在不同的观众和艺术作品中找到,尽管概率各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Empirical Studies of the Arts (ART) aims to be an interdisciplinary forum for theoretical and empirical studies of aesthetics, creativity, and all of the arts. It spans anthropological, psychological, neuroscientific, semiotic, and sociological studies of the creation, perception, and appreciation of literary, musical, visual and other art forms. Whether you are an active researcher or an interested bystander, Empirical Studies of the Arts keeps you up to date on the latest trends in scientific studies of the arts.
期刊最新文献
What Can Happen When We Look at Art?: An Exploratory Network Model and Latent Profile Analysis of Affective/Cognitive Aspects Underlying Shared, Supraordinate Responses to Museum Visual Art Can Virtual Art Touch Your Heart?—The Impact of Virtual Reality Art on Affect Considering Individual Characteristics and Aesthetic Experiences Preference for Harmony: A Preference for Structural Simplicity, Familiarity, or Both? Effects of an Art Intervention Program Using Ambiguous Image-Text Interactions on Creative Thinking Oscars won by the Best Picture of the Year: An Empirical Analysis Across the History of Academy Awards (1929–2023)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1