Efficacy and safety of Piclidenoson in the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY Archives of Dermatological Research Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1007/s00403-024-03506-y
Muhammad Zain Ul Haq, Saad Ashraf, Ayesha Shaukat, Laveeza Fatima, Muhammad Shahmeer Ullah Shah, Muhammad Ahsan Ansari, Muhammad Nabeel Saddique, Gharira Batool, Javed Iqbal
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of Piclidenoson in the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Muhammad Zain Ul Haq,&nbsp;Saad Ashraf,&nbsp;Ayesha Shaukat,&nbsp;Laveeza Fatima,&nbsp;Muhammad Shahmeer Ullah Shah,&nbsp;Muhammad Ahsan Ansari,&nbsp;Muhammad Nabeel Saddique,&nbsp;Gharira Batool,&nbsp;Javed Iqbal","doi":"10.1007/s00403-024-03506-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Psoriasis, an autoimmune inflammatory disease characterized by hyperproliferation of keratinocytes, affects 0.2–4.8% of the global population. The disease manifests primarily as plaque psoriasis, causing chronic physical and psychological burdens. Although numerous treatments exist, there is ongoing exploration for novel therapies due to concerns about the toxicity, efficacy, and costs of current options. An A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) agonist called Piclidenoson has been shown to reduce inflammation and could be used to treat moderate to severe psoriasis. This meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of Piclidenoson in psoriasis treatment. This meta-analysis was conducted accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024566459). A comprehensive search on Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Google Scholar was conducted up to July 2024. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving Piclidenoson. Efficacy outcomes included PASI 75 and PGA 0 or 1, while safety outcomes included adverse events. Pooled outcomes were presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical analysis employed the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> and X<sup>2</sup>index. Three RCTs with 574 patients (313 Piclidenoson, 261 placebo) met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference in achieving PASI 75 between Piclidenoson and placebo (OR: 1.62, 95% CI 0.70–3.75, <i>P</i> = 0.26, I<sup>2</sup> = 12%). However, Piclidenoson significantly improved PGA scores (OR: 2.74, 95% CI 1.22–6.16, <i>P</i> = 0.01, I²=0%). Safety assessment revealed no significant differences in adverse events, including nervous system, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, renal, and infections, compared to placebo. Piclidenoson demonstrates a significant improvement in PGA scores and a favorable safety profile, suggesting it could be a valuable addition to plaque-like psoriasis treatment. Further research with larger, longer-term RCTs is needed to confirm its efficacy and optimize clinical use.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00403-024-03506-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-024-03506-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Psoriasis, an autoimmune inflammatory disease characterized by hyperproliferation of keratinocytes, affects 0.2–4.8% of the global population. The disease manifests primarily as plaque psoriasis, causing chronic physical and psychological burdens. Although numerous treatments exist, there is ongoing exploration for novel therapies due to concerns about the toxicity, efficacy, and costs of current options. An A3 adenosine receptor (A3AR) agonist called Piclidenoson has been shown to reduce inflammation and could be used to treat moderate to severe psoriasis. This meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of Piclidenoson in psoriasis treatment. This meta-analysis was conducted accordance with the PRISMA guidelines and has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024566459). A comprehensive search on Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Google Scholar was conducted up to July 2024. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving Piclidenoson. Efficacy outcomes included PASI 75 and PGA 0 or 1, while safety outcomes included adverse events. Pooled outcomes were presented as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical analysis employed the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 and X2index. Three RCTs with 574 patients (313 Piclidenoson, 261 placebo) met the inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis showed no significant difference in achieving PASI 75 between Piclidenoson and placebo (OR: 1.62, 95% CI 0.70–3.75, P = 0.26, I2 = 12%). However, Piclidenoson significantly improved PGA scores (OR: 2.74, 95% CI 1.22–6.16, P = 0.01, I²=0%). Safety assessment revealed no significant differences in adverse events, including nervous system, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, renal, and infections, compared to placebo. Piclidenoson demonstrates a significant improvement in PGA scores and a favorable safety profile, suggesting it could be a valuable addition to plaque-like psoriasis treatment. Further research with larger, longer-term RCTs is needed to confirm its efficacy and optimize clinical use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
匹氯雷他生治疗斑块状银屑病的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
银屑病是一种以角质细胞过度增殖为特征的自身免疫性炎症疾病,全球有 0.2%-4.8%的人患有这种疾病。这种疾病主要表现为斑块状银屑病,给患者造成长期的生理和心理负担。虽然已有多种治疗方法,但由于对现有疗法的毒性、疗效和成本的担忧,人们仍在不断探索新型疗法。一种名为 Piclidenoson 的 A3 腺苷受体(A3AR)激动剂已被证明能减轻炎症,可用于治疗中度至重度银屑病。这项荟萃分析评估了 Piclidenoson 治疗银屑病的安全性和有效性。本荟萃分析按照 PRISMA 指南进行,并已在 PROSPERO 上注册(CRD42024566459)。截至 2024 年 7 月,我们在 Cochrane CENTRAL、PubMed/MEDLINE 和 Google Scholar 上进行了全面检索。纳入的研究均为涉及匹克利登松的随机对照试验(RCT)。疗效结果包括 PASI 75 和 PGA 0 或 1,安全性结果包括不良事件。汇总结果以几率比(OR)和 95% 置信区间(CI)表示。统计分析采用 Mantel-Haenszel 随机效应模型,异质性采用 I2 和 X2 指数进行评估。符合纳入标准的有三项 RCT,共 574 例患者(313 例匹利度松,261 例安慰剂)。汇总分析显示,在达到 PASI 75 方面,匹氯地罗松与安慰剂之间没有明显差异(OR:1.62,95% CI 0.70-3.75,P = 0.26,I2 = 12%)。然而,皮利酮能显著改善PGA评分(OR:2.74,95% CI 1.22-6.16,P = 0.01,I²=0%)。安全性评估显示,与安慰剂相比,包括神经系统、胃肠道、肌肉骨骼、肾脏和感染在内的不良事件无明显差异。Piclidenoson 能显著改善 PGA 评分并具有良好的安全性,这表明它可以作为斑块状银屑病治疗的重要补充。要确认其疗效并优化临床应用,还需要进行更大规模、更长期的 RCT 研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Comparative study of cutaneous malignant melanoma according to anatomical site: plantar versus non-plantar melanoma. Lichenoid paraneoplastic pemphigus in a patient presenting with follicular lymphoma: a review of the literature. Nailfold microscopy in adult-onset dermatomyositis in association with myositis antibodies. Biologic management of PASH syndrome: A systematic review A single-center retrospective analysis of primary cutaneous mucinous carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1