Canada needs a national COVID-19 inquiry now.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1186/s12916-024-03756-7
David Fisman, Jillian Horton, Matthew Oliver, Mark Ungrin, Joseph Vipond, Julia M Wright, Dick Zoutman
{"title":"Canada needs a national COVID-19 inquiry now.","authors":"David Fisman, Jillian Horton, Matthew Oliver, Mark Ungrin, Joseph Vipond, Julia M Wright, Dick Zoutman","doi":"10.1186/s12916-024-03756-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We are now in the fifth year of an ongoing pandemic, and Canada continues to experience significant surges of COVID-19 infections. In addition to the acute impacts of deaths and hospitalizations, there is growing awareness of an accumulation of organ damage and disability which is building a \"health debt\" that will affect Canadians for decades to come. Calls in 2023 for an inquiry into the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic went unheeded, despite relevant precedent. Canada urgently needs a comprehensive review of its successes and failures to chart a better response in the near- and long-term.</p><p><strong>Main body: </strong>While Canada fared better than many comparators in the early years of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is clearly still in a public health crisis. Infections are not only affecting Canadians' daily lives but also eroding healthcare capacity. Post-COVID condition is having accumulating and profound individual, social, and economic consequences. An inquiry is needed to understand the current evidence underlying policy choices, identify a better course of action on various fronts, and build resilience. More must be done to reduce transmission, including a serious public education campaign to better inform Canadians about COVID and effective mitigations, especially the benefits of respirator masks. We need a national standard for indoor air quality to make indoor public spaces safer, particularly schools. Data collection must be more robust, especially to understand and mitigate the disproportionate impacts on under-served communities and high-risk populations. General confidence in public health must be rebuilt, with a focus on communication and transparency. In particular, the wide variation in provincial policies has sown mistrust: evidence-based policy should be consistent. Finally, Canada's early success in vaccination has collapsed, and this development needs a careful post-mortem.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A complete investigation of Canada's response to the pandemic is not yet possible because that response is still ongoing and, while we have learned much, there remain areas of dispute and uncertainty. However, an inquiry is needed to conduct a rapid assessment of the current evidence and policies and provide recommendations on how to improve in 2025 and beyond as well as guidance for future pandemics.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"537"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03756-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We are now in the fifth year of an ongoing pandemic, and Canada continues to experience significant surges of COVID-19 infections. In addition to the acute impacts of deaths and hospitalizations, there is growing awareness of an accumulation of organ damage and disability which is building a "health debt" that will affect Canadians for decades to come. Calls in 2023 for an inquiry into the handling of the COVID-19 pandemic went unheeded, despite relevant precedent. Canada urgently needs a comprehensive review of its successes and failures to chart a better response in the near- and long-term.

Main body: While Canada fared better than many comparators in the early years of the COVID-19 pandemic, it is clearly still in a public health crisis. Infections are not only affecting Canadians' daily lives but also eroding healthcare capacity. Post-COVID condition is having accumulating and profound individual, social, and economic consequences. An inquiry is needed to understand the current evidence underlying policy choices, identify a better course of action on various fronts, and build resilience. More must be done to reduce transmission, including a serious public education campaign to better inform Canadians about COVID and effective mitigations, especially the benefits of respirator masks. We need a national standard for indoor air quality to make indoor public spaces safer, particularly schools. Data collection must be more robust, especially to understand and mitigate the disproportionate impacts on under-served communities and high-risk populations. General confidence in public health must be rebuilt, with a focus on communication and transparency. In particular, the wide variation in provincial policies has sown mistrust: evidence-based policy should be consistent. Finally, Canada's early success in vaccination has collapsed, and this development needs a careful post-mortem.

Conclusions: A complete investigation of Canada's response to the pandemic is not yet possible because that response is still ongoing and, while we have learned much, there remain areas of dispute and uncertainty. However, an inquiry is needed to conduct a rapid assessment of the current evidence and policies and provide recommendations on how to improve in 2025 and beyond as well as guidance for future pandemics.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加拿大现在需要对 COVID-19 进行全国性调查。
背景:大流行病已进入第五个年头,加拿大的 COVID-19 感染率继续大幅上升。除了死亡和住院的急性影响外,人们越来越意识到器官损伤和残疾的累积正在形成 "健康债务",将在未来几十年影响加拿大人。尽管有相关先例,但 2023 年要求调查 COVID-19 大流行病处理情况的呼吁却无人理睬。加拿大亟需对其成败进行全面审查,以便在近期和长期内制定更好的应对措施:虽然在 COVID-19 大流行的最初几年,加拿大的情况好于许多可比国家,但它显然仍处于公共卫生危机之中。感染不仅影响着加拿大人的日常生活,也侵蚀着医疗保健能力。后 COVID 状态正在对个人、社会和经济造成日益严重的后果。需要进行调查,以了解政策选择所依据的现有证据,确定各方面更好的行动方案,并建立复原能力。必须做更多的工作来减少传播,包括认真开展公众教育活动,让加拿大人更好地了解 COVID 和有效的缓解措施,特别是呼吸面罩的好处。我们需要一个全国性的室内空气质量标准,使室内公共场所,尤其是学校更加安全。数据收集工作必须更加有力,特别是要了解和减轻对服务不足的社区和高风险人群的过度影响。必须重建公众对公共卫生的普遍信心,重点是沟通和透明度。特别是,各省政策之间的巨大差异已经埋下了不信任的种子:以证据为基础的政策应该是一致的。最后,加拿大早期在疫苗接种方面取得的成功已经崩溃,需要对这一发展进行认真的事后总结:目前还不可能对加拿大应对大流行病的工作进行全面调查,因为应对工作仍在进行中,虽然我们已经学到了很多,但仍有争议和不确定的地方。然而,有必要进行一次调查,对当前的证据和政策进行快速评估,并就 2025 年及以后如何改进提出建议,同时为未来的大流行病提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
Diastolic dysfunction and risks of heart failure and death in long-term adult cancer survivors. Health impacts of takeaway management zones around schools in six different local authorities across England: a public health modelling study using PRIMEtime. Effect of combined treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation compared to monotherapy for the treatment of chronic insomnia: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, controlled trial. Impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators on mortality in heart failure receiving quadruple guideline-directed medical therapy: a propensity score-matched study. Impact of medication nonadherence and drug-drug interaction testing on the management of primary care patients with polypharmacy: a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1