Use of potentially inappropriate psychotropic medicines among older adults in 23 residential aged care facilities in Australia: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05542-9
Narjis Batool, Magdalena Z Raban, Karla L Seaman, Johanna I Westbrook, Nasir Wabe
{"title":"Use of potentially inappropriate psychotropic medicines among older adults in 23 residential aged care facilities in Australia: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Narjis Batool, Magdalena Z Raban, Karla L Seaman, Johanna I Westbrook, Nasir Wabe","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05542-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Psychotropic medications are frequently utilised in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Longitudinal medication administration data can offer crucial insights into the potential inappropriate use of psychotropic medicines (PIPMs), guiding future quality improvement initiatives. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of PIPMs use and assess variation in PIPMs use by facility for residents of RACFs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective longitudinal cohort study using routinely collected electronic health data (2020-2021) relating to 3064 residents from 23 RACFs in New South Wales, Australia. The study included permanent residents aged ≥ 65 years and median length of stay was 483 days. The prevalence of PIPMs use was estimated using updated Beers criteria 2023. The extent of exposure to PIPMs was measured using two metrics i.e., number of days residents were exposed to PIPMs and the proportion of days covered by PIPMs. We used logistic regression model to determine factors associated with PIPM use. Funnel plots to visualised variation in PIPMs use across facilities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 40% (n = 1224) residents used at least one PIPM and 10% (n = 302) used ≥ 2. The most frequently used PIPMs categories were benzodiazepines and Z-drugs (27.4%), followed by first and second generation antipsychotics (17.2%). Certain diagnoses (dementia, pain, depression, anxiety, and endocrine disorders) were associated with the increased use of PIPMs. For example, residents with dementia were 1.94 times more likely to use ≥ 2 PIPMs (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.50-2.51). The prevalence of at least one PIPM by residents in each facility ranged from 23.3 to 57.0% across facilities. The overall median number of days residents were exposed to PIPMs were 91 days (IQR 6-320) while the median proportion of days covered by at least one PIPM was 39.3% (IQR 2.6-86.6%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Residents in aged care facilities showed a high rate of PIPMs use with substantial variation across facilities. Quality improvement initiatives which target inappropriate psychotropic medication use are necessary, particularly considering the link between psychotropic drug use and adverse events such as falls.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":"24 1","pages":"953"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05542-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Psychotropic medications are frequently utilised in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Longitudinal medication administration data can offer crucial insights into the potential inappropriate use of psychotropic medicines (PIPMs), guiding future quality improvement initiatives. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of PIPMs use and assess variation in PIPMs use by facility for residents of RACFs.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective longitudinal cohort study using routinely collected electronic health data (2020-2021) relating to 3064 residents from 23 RACFs in New South Wales, Australia. The study included permanent residents aged ≥ 65 years and median length of stay was 483 days. The prevalence of PIPMs use was estimated using updated Beers criteria 2023. The extent of exposure to PIPMs was measured using two metrics i.e., number of days residents were exposed to PIPMs and the proportion of days covered by PIPMs. We used logistic regression model to determine factors associated with PIPM use. Funnel plots to visualised variation in PIPMs use across facilities.

Results: In total 40% (n = 1224) residents used at least one PIPM and 10% (n = 302) used ≥ 2. The most frequently used PIPMs categories were benzodiazepines and Z-drugs (27.4%), followed by first and second generation antipsychotics (17.2%). Certain diagnoses (dementia, pain, depression, anxiety, and endocrine disorders) were associated with the increased use of PIPMs. For example, residents with dementia were 1.94 times more likely to use ≥ 2 PIPMs (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.50-2.51). The prevalence of at least one PIPM by residents in each facility ranged from 23.3 to 57.0% across facilities. The overall median number of days residents were exposed to PIPMs were 91 days (IQR 6-320) while the median proportion of days covered by at least one PIPM was 39.3% (IQR 2.6-86.6%).

Conclusions: Residents in aged care facilities showed a high rate of PIPMs use with substantial variation across facilities. Quality improvement initiatives which target inappropriate psychotropic medication use are necessary, particularly considering the link between psychotropic drug use and adverse events such as falls.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚 23 家养老院中老年人潜在不当精神药物的使用情况:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:老年护理机构(RACF)经常使用精神药物。纵向用药数据可为了解精神药物(PIPMs)的潜在不当使用情况提供重要依据,从而为今后的质量改进措施提供指导。本研究旨在确定精神药物使用的普遍程度和预测因素,并评估各机构在使用精神药物方面的差异:我们使用例行收集的电子健康数据(2020-2021 年)进行了一项回顾性纵向队列研究,这些数据涉及澳大利亚新南威尔士州 23 家 RACF 的 3064 名居民。研究对象包括年龄≥65岁的常住居民,住院时间中位数为483天。使用 PIPMs 的流行率是根据 2023 年更新的 Beers 标准估算的。使用 PIPMs 的程度通过两个指标来衡量,即居民使用 PIPMs 的天数和 PIPMs 覆盖天数的比例。我们使用逻辑回归模型来确定与使用 PIPM 相关的因素。通过漏斗图直观地显示了各机构使用 PIPMs 的差异:共有 40% 的居民(n = 1224)至少使用过一种 PIPM,10% 的居民(n = 302)使用过 ≥ 2 种 PIPM。最常使用的 PIPMs 种类是苯二氮卓类药物和 Z 类药物(27.4%),其次是第一代和第二代抗精神病药物(17.2%)。某些诊断(痴呆、疼痛、抑郁、焦虑和内分泌失调)与 PIPMs 使用量的增加有关。例如,患有痴呆症的住院患者使用 ≥ 2 种 PIPMs 的可能性是其他患者的 1.94 倍(OR 1.94;95% CI 1.50-2.51)。各机构居民至少使用一种 PIPM 的比例从 23.3% 到 57.0% 不等。居民接触PIPM的总天数中位数为91天(IQR 6-320),而至少有一种PIPM的天数比例中位数为39.3%(IQR 2.6-86.6%):结论:老年护理机构的住院患者使用 PIPM 的比例较高,但各机构之间的差异很大。有必要针对精神药物的不当使用采取质量改进措施,尤其是考虑到精神药物的使用与跌倒等不良事件之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Quality of life and associated characteristics in long-term care residents with advanced dementia in Macao: a cross-sectional study. Home physical therapy versus telerehabilitation in improving motor function and quality of life in Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial. Psychotropic use for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Association of serum creatinine-cystatin C ratio with all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality in US adults: a nationwide cohort study. Correction: Development of a machine learning-based risk assessment model for loneliness among elderly Chinese: a cross-sectional study based on Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1