Comparison of two metabolomics-platforms to discover biomarkers in critically ill patients from serum analysis

IF 7 2区 医学 Q1 BIOLOGY Computers in biology and medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109393
Tiago A.H. Fonseca , Cristiana P. Von Rekowski , Rúben Araújo , M. Conceição Oliveira , Gonçalo C. Justino , Luís Bento , Cecília R.C. Calado
{"title":"Comparison of two metabolomics-platforms to discover biomarkers in critically ill patients from serum analysis","authors":"Tiago A.H. Fonseca ,&nbsp;Cristiana P. Von Rekowski ,&nbsp;Rúben Araújo ,&nbsp;M. Conceição Oliveira ,&nbsp;Gonçalo C. Justino ,&nbsp;Luís Bento ,&nbsp;Cecília R.C. Calado","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.109393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Serum metabolome analysis is essential for identifying disease biomarkers and predicting patient outcomes in precision medicine. Thus, this study aims to compare Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS) with Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy in acquiring the serum metabolome of critically ill patients, associated with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and predicting death. Three groups of 8 patients were considered. Group A did not require IMV and survived hospitalization, while Groups B and C required IMV. Group C patients died a median of 5 days after sample harvest. Good prediction models were achieved when comparing groups A to B and B to C using both platforms’ data, with UHPLC-HRMS showing 8–17 % higher accuracies (≥83 %). However, developing predictive models using metabolite sets was not feasible when comparing unbalanced populations, i.e., Groups A and B combined to Group C. Alternatively, FTIR-spectroscopy enabled the development of a model with 83 % accuracy. Overall, UHPLC-HRMS data yields more robust prediction models when comparing homogenous populations, potentially enhancing understanding of metabolic mechanisms and improving patient therapy adjustments. FTIR-spectroscopy is more suitable for unbalanced populations. Its simplicity, speed, cost-effectiveness, and high-throughput operation make it ideal for large-scale studies and clinical translation in complex populations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10578,"journal":{"name":"Computers in biology and medicine","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 109393"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in biology and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010482524014781","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Serum metabolome analysis is essential for identifying disease biomarkers and predicting patient outcomes in precision medicine. Thus, this study aims to compare Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS) with Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy in acquiring the serum metabolome of critically ill patients, associated with invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and predicting death. Three groups of 8 patients were considered. Group A did not require IMV and survived hospitalization, while Groups B and C required IMV. Group C patients died a median of 5 days after sample harvest. Good prediction models were achieved when comparing groups A to B and B to C using both platforms’ data, with UHPLC-HRMS showing 8–17 % higher accuracies (≥83 %). However, developing predictive models using metabolite sets was not feasible when comparing unbalanced populations, i.e., Groups A and B combined to Group C. Alternatively, FTIR-spectroscopy enabled the development of a model with 83 % accuracy. Overall, UHPLC-HRMS data yields more robust prediction models when comparing homogenous populations, potentially enhancing understanding of metabolic mechanisms and improving patient therapy adjustments. FTIR-spectroscopy is more suitable for unbalanced populations. Its simplicity, speed, cost-effectiveness, and high-throughput operation make it ideal for large-scale studies and clinical translation in complex populations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较两个代谢组学平台,从血清分析中发现重症患者的生物标记物。
在精准医疗中,血清代谢组分析对于确定疾病生物标记物和预测患者预后至关重要。因此,本研究旨在比较超高效液相色谱-高分辨质谱法(UHPLC-HRMS)和傅立叶变换红外光谱法(FTIR)在获取与有创机械通气(IMV)相关的重症患者血清代谢组和预测死亡方面的作用。三组共 8 名患者。A 组无需进行有创机械通气并在住院期间存活下来,而 B 组和 C 组则需要进行有创机械通气。C 组患者在样本采集后中位数 5 天死亡。使用两个平台的数据对 A 组和 B 组以及 B 组和 C 组进行比较后,建立了良好的预测模型,其中 UHPLC-HRMS 的准确率高出 8-17%(≥83%)。不过,在比较不平衡群体(即 A 组和 B 组与 C 组的组合)时,使用代谢物集开发预测模型是不可行的。总之,在比较同质人群时,超高效液相色谱-质谱联用仪数据能生成更可靠的预测模型,从而有可能加深对代谢机制的了解,改善患者的治疗调整。傅立叶变换红外光谱法更适用于不平衡人群。傅立叶变换红外光谱法操作简便、速度快、成本效益高且具有高通量,因此非常适合在复杂人群中进行大规模研究和临床转化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers in biology and medicine
Computers in biology and medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
10.40%
发文量
1086
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: Computers in Biology and Medicine is an international forum for sharing groundbreaking advancements in the use of computers in bioscience and medicine. This journal serves as a medium for communicating essential research, instruction, ideas, and information regarding the rapidly evolving field of computer applications in these domains. By encouraging the exchange of knowledge, we aim to facilitate progress and innovation in the utilization of computers in biology and medicine.
期刊最新文献
An adaptive enhanced human memory algorithm for multi-level image segmentation for pathological lung cancer images. Integrating multimodal learning for improved vital health parameter estimation. Riemannian manifold-based geometric clustering of continuous glucose monitoring to improve personalized diabetes management. Transformative artificial intelligence in gastric cancer: Advancements in diagnostic techniques. Artificial intelligence and deep learning algorithms for epigenetic sequence analysis: A review for epigeneticists and AI experts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1