The optional apex sites for quad zygomatic implant placement in edentulous patients with severe alveolar bone resorption: a CBCT anatomical analysis.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE BMC Oral Health Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1186/s12903-024-05140-6
Jiayi Wang, Bo Chen, Yuexin Zhao, Shaoxia Pan, Xiangliang Xu
{"title":"The optional apex sites for quad zygomatic implant placement in edentulous patients with severe alveolar bone resorption: a CBCT anatomical analysis.","authors":"Jiayi Wang, Bo Chen, Yuexin Zhao, Shaoxia Pan, Xiangliang Xu","doi":"10.1186/s12903-024-05140-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the difference in bone-implant contact (BIC) and the rate of infratemporal fossa intrusion among different apex sites for quad zygomatic implants (ZIs) design in edentulous patients with severe alveolar bone resorption.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with maxillary edentulism were evaluated. Alveolar bone resorption was assessed using the Cawood and Howell classification. Participants with Class IV or Class V/VI bone resorption were selected. The zygomatic bone was devided into upper, middle and lower thirds, with four potential implant apex locations identified in each third. Virtual planning for quad ZIs, along with measurements of BIC were performed. Additionally, the occurrence of ZIs intrusion into the infratemporal fossa was examined, and the distance between ZI and orbital cavity was measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 CBCT scans of edentulous patients, encompassing 56 zygomas, were analyzed. Thirty-nine single lateral posterior edentulous jaws were classified into Class IV subgroup, while 17 into Class V/IV subgroup. Among all patients and patients in subgroups, the anterior and posterior ZI exhibited the highest BIC at points A3 and B2, respectively. The average zygomatic BIC at A3 apex point was 18.3 ± 3.9 mm, and that at the B2 apex point was 16.3 ± 5.3 mm. Quad ZIs risk intrusion into the infratemporal fossa when positioned at B2, B3, and at all apex points of the lower zygoma segment. Three anterior ZIs at A3 point show less than 1 mm distance to orbital cavity. Overall, A3 and B1 apex points showed high BIC and low infratemporal intrusion rate for quad ZIs, irrespective of patient's alveolar bone resorption status.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optional apex point for anterior and posterior quad ZIs is A3 and B1, respectively, regardless of the patients's alveolar bone resorption level. Alveolar bone resorption does not affect the BIC for quad ZIs. Anterior ZI positioned at A3 point may present high risk for orbital penetration and may not be reccomended in a Quad ZI approach.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The clinical research is registered under the number ChiCTR2100044472.</p>","PeriodicalId":9072,"journal":{"name":"BMC Oral Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"1393"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569599/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05140-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the difference in bone-implant contact (BIC) and the rate of infratemporal fossa intrusion among different apex sites for quad zygomatic implants (ZIs) design in edentulous patients with severe alveolar bone resorption.

Methods: Patients with maxillary edentulism were evaluated. Alveolar bone resorption was assessed using the Cawood and Howell classification. Participants with Class IV or Class V/VI bone resorption were selected. The zygomatic bone was devided into upper, middle and lower thirds, with four potential implant apex locations identified in each third. Virtual planning for quad ZIs, along with measurements of BIC were performed. Additionally, the occurrence of ZIs intrusion into the infratemporal fossa was examined, and the distance between ZI and orbital cavity was measured.

Results: A total of 28 CBCT scans of edentulous patients, encompassing 56 zygomas, were analyzed. Thirty-nine single lateral posterior edentulous jaws were classified into Class IV subgroup, while 17 into Class V/IV subgroup. Among all patients and patients in subgroups, the anterior and posterior ZI exhibited the highest BIC at points A3 and B2, respectively. The average zygomatic BIC at A3 apex point was 18.3 ± 3.9 mm, and that at the B2 apex point was 16.3 ± 5.3 mm. Quad ZIs risk intrusion into the infratemporal fossa when positioned at B2, B3, and at all apex points of the lower zygoma segment. Three anterior ZIs at A3 point show less than 1 mm distance to orbital cavity. Overall, A3 and B1 apex points showed high BIC and low infratemporal intrusion rate for quad ZIs, irrespective of patient's alveolar bone resorption status.

Conclusions: The optional apex point for anterior and posterior quad ZIs is A3 and B1, respectively, regardless of the patients's alveolar bone resorption level. Alveolar bone resorption does not affect the BIC for quad ZIs. Anterior ZI positioned at A3 point may present high risk for orbital penetration and may not be reccomended in a Quad ZI approach.

Trial registration: The clinical research is registered under the number ChiCTR2100044472.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对牙槽骨严重吸收的无牙颌患者进行四颧种植体植入的可选顶点部位:CBCT 解剖分析。
目的研究在牙槽骨严重吸收的无牙颌患者中,四颧种植体(ZIs)设计的不同顶点部位在骨-种植体接触(BIC)和颞下窝侵入率方面的差异:对上颌无牙患者进行评估。采用 Cawood 和 Howell 分级法评估牙槽骨吸收情况。筛选出 IV 级或 V/VI 级骨吸收的患者。将颧骨分为上、中、下三等分,并在每三分中确定四个潜在的种植体顶点位置。对四个 ZI 进行虚拟规划,并测量 BIC。此外,还检查了ZI侵入颞下窝的情况,并测量了ZI与眶腔之间的距离:结果:共分析了 28 例无牙患者的 CBCT 扫描结果,包括 56 个颧骨。其中 39 例单侧后方无牙颌患者被归入 IV 类亚组,17 例被归入 V/IV 类亚组。在所有患者和亚组患者中,前ZI和后ZI分别在A3点和B2点表现出最高的BIC。A3顶点的平均颧骨BIC为18.3 ± 3.9 mm,B2顶点的平均颧骨BIC为16.3 ± 5.3 mm。四ZI位于B2、B3和颧骨下段所有顶点时,有侵入颞下窝的风险。位于 A3 点的三个前 ZI 与眶腔的距离不到 1 毫米。总的来说,无论患者的牙槽骨吸收状况如何,A3 和 B1 顶点的四 ZI 都显示出较高的 BIC 和较低的颞下侵入率:无论患者的牙槽骨吸收水平如何,前方和后方四ZI的可选顶点分别是A3和B1。牙槽骨吸收并不影响四方 ZI 的 BIC。位于A3点的前ZI可能会带来高的穿眶风险,因此可能不建议采用四ZI方法:临床研究注册号为ChiCTR2100044472。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Oral Health
BMC Oral Health DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
481
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Oral Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of disorders of the mouth, teeth and gums, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Correction: The effect of root orientation on inferior alveolar nerve injury after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars based on propensity score‑matched analysis: a retrospective cohort study. Do randomised clinical trials on dental caries adopt Open Science practices? Effect of saliva on accuracy of digital dental implant transfer using two different materials of intraoral scan bodies with different exposed lengths. Regenerative endodontic therapy in immature teeth using photobiomodulation and photodynamic therapy; a histomorphological study in canine model. Salivary microbiome variations in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with different stages of periodontitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1