Melissa Martyn, Ling Lee, Alli Jan, Rigan Tytherleigh, Fiona Lynch, Chloe Mighton, Sophie E Bouffler, Elly Lynch, Ivan Macciocca, Lisette Curnow, Giulia McCorkell, Sebastian Lunke, Belinda Chong, Martin B Delatycki, Lilian Downie, Danya Vears, Stephanie Best, Marc Clausen, Yvonne Bombard, Zornitza Stark, Clara Gaff
{"title":"Offering complex genomic screening in acute pediatric settings: family decision-making and outcomes.","authors":"Melissa Martyn, Ling Lee, Alli Jan, Rigan Tytherleigh, Fiona Lynch, Chloe Mighton, Sophie E Bouffler, Elly Lynch, Ivan Macciocca, Lisette Curnow, Giulia McCorkell, Sebastian Lunke, Belinda Chong, Martin B Delatycki, Lilian Downie, Danya Vears, Stephanie Best, Marc Clausen, Yvonne Bombard, Zornitza Stark, Clara Gaff","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2024.101327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Families of children in pediatric acute care offered ultra-rapid genomic sequencing are making complex decisions in a high stress period. To reduce complexity for families and clinicians, we offered genomic screening for the child and parents after completion of diagnostic testing. We evaluated uptake, understanding and service delivery preferences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 235 families who had completed ultra-rapid diagnostic genomic sequencing at 17 Australian hospitals were offered up to three screens on their genomic data: pediatric-onset, adult-onset, expanded couple carrier screening. We investigated decision-making, understanding and service delivery preferences using surveys at three timepoints (pre-counseling, post-counseling, post-result) and performed inductive content analysis of pre-test genetic counseling transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>119 families (51%) attended genetic counseling with 115 (49%) accepting genomic screening. Survey respondents were more likely to find decisions about couple carrier screening 'easy' (87%) than adult (68%; p=0.002) or pediatric (71%; p=0.01) screening decisions. All respondents with newly detected pathogenic variants accurately recalled this one month later. A delayed offer of screening was acceptable to most respondents (78%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Separating genomic screening from the stressful diagnostic period is supported by families who demonstrate good knowledge and recall. Our results suggest delaying genomic screening should be trialed more widely.</p>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"101327"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gim.2024.101327","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Families of children in pediatric acute care offered ultra-rapid genomic sequencing are making complex decisions in a high stress period. To reduce complexity for families and clinicians, we offered genomic screening for the child and parents after completion of diagnostic testing. We evaluated uptake, understanding and service delivery preferences.
Methods: A cohort of 235 families who had completed ultra-rapid diagnostic genomic sequencing at 17 Australian hospitals were offered up to three screens on their genomic data: pediatric-onset, adult-onset, expanded couple carrier screening. We investigated decision-making, understanding and service delivery preferences using surveys at three timepoints (pre-counseling, post-counseling, post-result) and performed inductive content analysis of pre-test genetic counseling transcripts.
Results: 119 families (51%) attended genetic counseling with 115 (49%) accepting genomic screening. Survey respondents were more likely to find decisions about couple carrier screening 'easy' (87%) than adult (68%; p=0.002) or pediatric (71%; p=0.01) screening decisions. All respondents with newly detected pathogenic variants accurately recalled this one month later. A delayed offer of screening was acceptable to most respondents (78%).
Conclusion: Separating genomic screening from the stressful diagnostic period is supported by families who demonstrate good knowledge and recall. Our results suggest delaying genomic screening should be trialed more widely.
期刊介绍:
Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health.
GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.