Patient-centered medical homes and vision care for children: a cross-sectional analysis with data from the national survey of children's health 2018-2019.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS BMC Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1186/s12887-024-05226-8
Afua O Asare, Brian C Stagg, Carole Stipelman, Olivia J Killeen, Patrice M Hicks, Olaoluwa Omotowa, E Eugenie Hartmann, Heather T Keenan, J D Smith
{"title":"Patient-centered medical homes and vision care for children: a cross-sectional analysis with data from the national survey of children's health 2018-2019.","authors":"Afua O Asare, Brian C Stagg, Carole Stipelman, Olivia J Killeen, Patrice M Hicks, Olaoluwa Omotowa, E Eugenie Hartmann, Heather T Keenan, J D Smith","doi":"10.1186/s12887-024-05226-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vision screening as part of well-child visits is recommended annually for US children 3 to 6 years. However, 63% of children do not get a vision screening in well-child visits. The Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) improves the receipt of preventive care visits in other medical specialties but it is unknown if it improves receipt of vision screening. The objective of this study is to determine whether caregiver-reported receipt of care in a PCMH is associated with receiving a vision screening test in a well-child visit for children 3 to 6 years in a pediatrician/general doctor's office ('primary care').</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Population-based data for US children aged 3 to 6 years was derived from the National Survey of Children's Health (2018-2019). Children were excluded if they did not have a well-child visit in the previous 12 months. The primary exposure was receipt of care in a PCMH ('PCMH care'), and the primary outcome was receipt of a vision screening in primary care. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and predicted probabilities were computed for children with and without PCMH care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 9,587 children with well-child visits, 4,984 (50.9%) were males. There were 1,107 (23.3%) Hispanic, 6704 (52.8%) White/Non-Hispanic and 545 (11.8%) Black/Non-Hispanic children. There were 5,482 (51.8%) children who received PCMH care. Of those with PCMH care, 2,629 (52.2%) received a vision screening in primary care. Those with PCMH care (52.2%) had a higher odds of receiving a vision screening (aOR, 1.31; 95% CI 1.11, 1.55) in primary care compared to children without PCMH care (42.8%). The predicted probability of vision screening in primary care was 50.8% (95% CI 48.2, 53.5) for children that received PCMH care, and 44.3% (95% CI 41.3, 47.3) without PCMH care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Caregiver-reported receipt of PCMH care was associated with a greater likelihood of vision screening for children 3 to 6 years in a well-child visit. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms through which PCMH care contributes to the greater odds of vision screening in primary care to inform the creation of strategic interventions to prevent vision loss and its long-term implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9144,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-05226-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vision screening as part of well-child visits is recommended annually for US children 3 to 6 years. However, 63% of children do not get a vision screening in well-child visits. The Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) improves the receipt of preventive care visits in other medical specialties but it is unknown if it improves receipt of vision screening. The objective of this study is to determine whether caregiver-reported receipt of care in a PCMH is associated with receiving a vision screening test in a well-child visit for children 3 to 6 years in a pediatrician/general doctor's office ('primary care').

Method: Population-based data for US children aged 3 to 6 years was derived from the National Survey of Children's Health (2018-2019). Children were excluded if they did not have a well-child visit in the previous 12 months. The primary exposure was receipt of care in a PCMH ('PCMH care'), and the primary outcome was receipt of a vision screening in primary care. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and predicted probabilities were computed for children with and without PCMH care.

Results: Among 9,587 children with well-child visits, 4,984 (50.9%) were males. There were 1,107 (23.3%) Hispanic, 6704 (52.8%) White/Non-Hispanic and 545 (11.8%) Black/Non-Hispanic children. There were 5,482 (51.8%) children who received PCMH care. Of those with PCMH care, 2,629 (52.2%) received a vision screening in primary care. Those with PCMH care (52.2%) had a higher odds of receiving a vision screening (aOR, 1.31; 95% CI 1.11, 1.55) in primary care compared to children without PCMH care (42.8%). The predicted probability of vision screening in primary care was 50.8% (95% CI 48.2, 53.5) for children that received PCMH care, and 44.3% (95% CI 41.3, 47.3) without PCMH care.

Conclusions: Caregiver-reported receipt of PCMH care was associated with a greater likelihood of vision screening for children 3 to 6 years in a well-child visit. Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms through which PCMH care contributes to the greater odds of vision screening in primary care to inform the creation of strategic interventions to prevent vision loss and its long-term implications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以患者为中心的医疗之家与儿童视力保健:利用 2018-2019 年全国儿童健康调查数据进行的横断面分析。
背景:作为儿童健康检查的一部分,建议美国 3-6 岁儿童每年进行一次视力筛查。然而,63% 的儿童没有在儿童健康检查中接受视力筛查。以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)提高了其他医疗专科的预防性保健就诊率,但是否能提高视力筛查就诊率还不得而知。本研究的目的是确定由护理人员报告的接受 PCMH 护理的情况是否与 3-6 岁儿童在儿科医生/普通医生诊所("初级保健")接受视力筛查有关:美国 3 至 6 岁儿童的人口数据来自《全国儿童健康调查(2018-2019 年)》。如果儿童在过去 12 个月中没有接受过儿童健康检查,则将其排除在外。主要暴露是接受了 PCMH 护理("PCMH 护理"),主要结果是接受了初级保健视力筛查。对接受和未接受 PCMH 护理的儿童计算了调整后的几率比(aOR)和预测概率:在接受儿童健康检查的 9587 名儿童中,4984 名(50.9%)为男性。其中 1107 名(23.3%)为西班牙裔儿童,6704 名(52.8%)为白人/非西班牙裔儿童,545 名(11.8%)为黑人/非西班牙裔儿童。有 5482 名(51.8%)儿童接受了 PCMH 护理。在接受 PCMH 护理的儿童中,有 2629 人(52.2%)在初级保健中接受了视力筛查。与未接受 PCMH 护理的儿童(42.8%)相比,接受 PCMH 护理的儿童(52.2%)在初级保健中接受视力筛查的几率更高(aOR,1.31;95% CI 1.11,1.55)。接受过 PCMH 护理的儿童在初级保健中接受视力筛查的预测概率为 50.8%(95% CI 48.2,53.5),而未接受过 PCMH 护理的儿童接受视力筛查的预测概率为 44.3%(95% CI 41.3,47.3):结论:护理人员报告的接受 PCMH 护理与 3-6 岁儿童在儿童健康检查中接受视力筛查的可能性增加有关。我们需要进一步研究,以了解 PCMH 护理是如何提高初级保健视力筛查几率的,从而为制定预防视力丧失及其长期影响的战略干预措施提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pediatrics
BMC Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
683
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pediatrics is an open access journal publishing peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of health care in neonates, children and adolescents, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Identification of risk factors for necrotizing enterocolitis in twins: a case-control matching analysis of over ten-years' experience. Patient-centered medical homes and vision care for children: a cross-sectional analysis with data from the national survey of children's health 2018-2019. The diagnostic value of peripheral blood lymphocyte testing in children with infectious mononucleosis. Different antithrombotic strategies to prevent cardiovascular complications in Kawasaki patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evaluating parental knowledge and attitudes toward childhood hearing loss: a cross-sectional study in Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1