The Associations Between Parenting and Bullying Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.7 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Youth and Adolescence Pub Date : 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1007/s10964-024-02108-1
Xiaowei Chu, Zikang Chen
{"title":"The Associations Between Parenting and Bullying Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Xiaowei Chu, Zikang Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10964-024-02108-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Parenting styles are closely related to bullying behavior in children and adolescents. However, differences in study design and inconsistent results create uncertainty regarding the relationship between parenting and bullying. This study aimed to evaluate the associations between four parenting styles and bullying perpetration/victimization through a meta-analysis, identifying sources of study heterogeneity by examining moderating effects. This meta-analysis included 107 studies with 624 effect sizes and 162203 participants (49.28% female, M<sub>age</sub> = 13.51, SD<sub>age</sub> = 2.56). Results indicated that positive parenting was negatively correlated with bullying perpetration and victimization, while negative/harsh parenting and uninvolved parenting were positively correlated with bullying perpetration and victimization. A positive correlation was also found between psychologically controlling parenting and bullying victimization (not perpetration). Significant moderating variables included the identity of the caregiver, country of origin, ethnic group, reporter of parenting, reporter of bullying, and measure of bullying. Specifically, the mother's psychological control was more related to bullying perpetration and victimization than the father's. Compared to other countries and ethnic groups, the relationships between psychologically controlling parenting or negative/harsh parenting and bullying were more positive in studies of Chinese and Asians. The relationship between negative/harsh parenting and bullying demonstrated a greater effect size in self-reported measures of parenting and bullying. Finally, a stronger correlation was found between negative/harsh parenting and bullying victimization when using the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire to measure bullying. The current study deepens the understanding of the relationship between different parenting styles and bullying, emphasizing that adopting appropriate parenting, particularly positive parenting behaviors, helps mitigate bullying issues and achieve positive developmental outcomes for children and adolescents.</p>","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-024-02108-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Parenting styles are closely related to bullying behavior in children and adolescents. However, differences in study design and inconsistent results create uncertainty regarding the relationship between parenting and bullying. This study aimed to evaluate the associations between four parenting styles and bullying perpetration/victimization through a meta-analysis, identifying sources of study heterogeneity by examining moderating effects. This meta-analysis included 107 studies with 624 effect sizes and 162203 participants (49.28% female, Mage = 13.51, SDage = 2.56). Results indicated that positive parenting was negatively correlated with bullying perpetration and victimization, while negative/harsh parenting and uninvolved parenting were positively correlated with bullying perpetration and victimization. A positive correlation was also found between psychologically controlling parenting and bullying victimization (not perpetration). Significant moderating variables included the identity of the caregiver, country of origin, ethnic group, reporter of parenting, reporter of bullying, and measure of bullying. Specifically, the mother's psychological control was more related to bullying perpetration and victimization than the father's. Compared to other countries and ethnic groups, the relationships between psychologically controlling parenting or negative/harsh parenting and bullying were more positive in studies of Chinese and Asians. The relationship between negative/harsh parenting and bullying demonstrated a greater effect size in self-reported measures of parenting and bullying. Finally, a stronger correlation was found between negative/harsh parenting and bullying victimization when using the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire to measure bullying. The current study deepens the understanding of the relationship between different parenting styles and bullying, emphasizing that adopting appropriate parenting, particularly positive parenting behaviors, helps mitigate bullying issues and achieve positive developmental outcomes for children and adolescents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
亲职教育与儿童和青少年中的欺凌行为之间的关联:系统回顾与元分析》。
养育方式与儿童和青少年的欺凌行为密切相关。然而,研究设计的差异和结果的不一致造成了养育方式与欺凌之间关系的不确定性。本研究旨在通过荟萃分析评估四种教养方式与欺凌实施/受害之间的关系,并通过研究调节效应来确定研究异质性的来源。这项荟萃分析包括 107 项研究、624 个效应大小和 162203 名参与者(49.28% 为女性,平均年龄 = 13.51 岁,平均年龄 = 2.56 岁)。结果表明,积极的养育方式与欺凌行为和受害情况呈负相关,而消极/严厉的养育方式和不参与的养育方式与欺凌行为和受害情况呈正相关。研究还发现,心理控制型养育与欺凌受害(而非实施)之间存在正相关。重要的调节变量包括照顾者的身份、原籍国、种族群体、养育行为报告人、欺凌行为报告人以及欺凌行为的衡量标准。具体来说,母亲的心理控制比父亲的心理控制与欺凌实施和受害的关系更大。与其他国家和族群相比,在针对中国人和亚洲人的研究中,心理控制型养育方式或消极/严厉的养育方式与欺凌之间的关系更为积极。消极/严厉的养育方式与欺凌之间的关系在自我报告的养育和欺凌测量中显示出更大的效应规模。最后,在使用 "奥尔维斯欺凌/受害者问卷"(Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire)测量欺凌行为时,发现消极/严厉的养育方式与欺凌受害之间存在更强的相关性。本研究加深了人们对不同养育方式与欺凌之间关系的理解,强调了采取适当的养育方式,尤其是积极的养育行为,有助于缓解欺凌问题,并为儿童和青少年取得积极的发展成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Journal of Youth and Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
155
期刊介绍: Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal Associations Among Socioeconomic Status, Delay Discounting, and Substance Use in Adolescence. Potential Mechanism Linking Peer Relationships and Adolescent Prosocial Behavior: Mediation of Cognitive Empathy and Moderations of OXTR and DRD2. They Are Not All the Same: Defenders of Ethnically Victimized Adolescents. Friend Emotional Support and Dynamics of Adolescent Socioemotional Problems. Serial Cascade Effects of Relative Deprivation and Anger Rumination on the Development of Social Aggression Over 2.5 Years in Emerging Adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1