Jan Philipp Payonk, Henning Bathel, Nils Arbeiter, Maria Kober, Mareike Fauser, Alexander Storch, Ursula van Rienen, Julius Zimmermann
{"title":"Improving computational models of deep brain stimulation through experimental calibration.","authors":"Jan Philipp Payonk, Henning Bathel, Nils Arbeiter, Maria Kober, Mareike Fauser, Alexander Storch, Ursula van Rienen, Julius Zimmermann","doi":"10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deep brain stimulation has become a well-established clinical tool to treat movement disorders. Nevertheless, the knowledge of processes initiated by the stimulation remains limited. To address this knowledge gap, computational models are developed to gain deeper insight. However, their predictive power remains constrained by model uncertainties and a lack of validation and calibration.</p><p><strong>New method: </strong>Exemplified with rodent microelectrodes, we present a workflow for validating electrode model geometry using microscopy and impedance spectroscopy in vitro before implantation. We address uncertainties in the tissue distribution and dielectric properties and outline a concept for calibrating the computational model based on in vivo impedance spectroscopy measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The standard deviation of the volume of tissue activated across the 18 characterized electrodes was approximately 32.93%, underscoring the importance of electrode characterization. Thus, the workflow significantly enhances the model predictions' credibility of neural activation exemplified in a rodent model.</p><p><strong>Comparison with existing methods: </strong>Computational models are frequently employed without validation or calibration, relying instead on manufacturers' specifications. Our approach provides an accessible method to obtain a validated and calibrated electrode geometry, which significantly enhances the reliability of the computational model that relies on this electrode.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>By reducing the uncertainties of the model, the accuracy in predicting neural activation is increased. The entire workflow is realized in open-source software, making it adaptable for other use cases, such as deep brain stimulation in humans. Additionally, the framework allows for the integration of further experiments, enabling live updates and refinements to computational models.</p>","PeriodicalId":16415,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","volume":" ","pages":"110320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuroscience Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2024.110320","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Deep brain stimulation has become a well-established clinical tool to treat movement disorders. Nevertheless, the knowledge of processes initiated by the stimulation remains limited. To address this knowledge gap, computational models are developed to gain deeper insight. However, their predictive power remains constrained by model uncertainties and a lack of validation and calibration.
New method: Exemplified with rodent microelectrodes, we present a workflow for validating electrode model geometry using microscopy and impedance spectroscopy in vitro before implantation. We address uncertainties in the tissue distribution and dielectric properties and outline a concept for calibrating the computational model based on in vivo impedance spectroscopy measurements.
Results: The standard deviation of the volume of tissue activated across the 18 characterized electrodes was approximately 32.93%, underscoring the importance of electrode characterization. Thus, the workflow significantly enhances the model predictions' credibility of neural activation exemplified in a rodent model.
Comparison with existing methods: Computational models are frequently employed without validation or calibration, relying instead on manufacturers' specifications. Our approach provides an accessible method to obtain a validated and calibrated electrode geometry, which significantly enhances the reliability of the computational model that relies on this electrode.
Conclusion: By reducing the uncertainties of the model, the accuracy in predicting neural activation is increased. The entire workflow is realized in open-source software, making it adaptable for other use cases, such as deep brain stimulation in humans. Additionally, the framework allows for the integration of further experiments, enabling live updates and refinements to computational models.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Neuroscience Methods publishes papers that describe new methods that are specifically for neuroscience research conducted in invertebrates, vertebrates or in man. Major methodological improvements or important refinements of established neuroscience methods are also considered for publication. The Journal''s Scope includes all aspects of contemporary neuroscience research, including anatomical, behavioural, biochemical, cellular, computational, molecular, invasive and non-invasive imaging, optogenetic, and physiological research investigations.