Primary resistance to nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy affects second-line treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Cancer Science Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1111/cas.16326
Kanami Mori, Kazuyuki Numakura, Yuto Matsushita, Takahiro Kojima, Takahiro Osawa, Tomokazu Sazuka, Shingo Hatakeyama, Keisuke Goto, Kazutoshi Yamana, Shuya Kandori, Takahiro Kimura, Naotaka Nishiyama, Yukari Bando, Kazutoshi Fujita, Kosuke Ueda, Hajime Tanaka, Ryotaro Tomida, Toshifumi Kurahashi, Hiroshi Kitamura, Hideaki Miyake, Tomonori Habuchi
{"title":"Primary resistance to nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy affects second-line treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.","authors":"Kanami Mori, Kazuyuki Numakura, Yuto Matsushita, Takahiro Kojima, Takahiro Osawa, Tomokazu Sazuka, Shingo Hatakeyama, Keisuke Goto, Kazutoshi Yamana, Shuya Kandori, Takahiro Kimura, Naotaka Nishiyama, Yukari Bando, Kazutoshi Fujita, Kosuke Ueda, Hajime Tanaka, Ryotaro Tomida, Toshifumi Kurahashi, Hiroshi Kitamura, Hideaki Miyake, Tomonori Habuchi","doi":"10.1111/cas.16326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) has a long-term response rate of 30% for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, 20% of patients develop primary resistant disease (PRD) to NIVO+IPI and show poor survival outcomes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of PRD as a second-line treatment in patients with mRCC. The data used in this multi-institutional, retrospective cohort were collected between August 2015 and January 2023. In total, 189 patients with mRCC were treated with NIVO+IPI and then with a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Associations between PRD and progression-free survival of second-line treatment (PFS), progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. The median age at NIVO+IPI initiation was 67 years in the male-dominant population (n = 140, 74.1%), and most patients had clear cell histology (n = 140, 74.1%). PRD was recorded in 42 (22.2%) of 189 patients during NIVO+IPI therapy. Patients who experienced PRD showed poor PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.788; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.176-2.718; p = 0.007), PFS2 (HR, 4.127; 95% CI, 2.649-6.431; p < 0.001), and OS (HR, 3.330; 95% CI, 2.040-5.437; p < 0.001). Before starting second-line therapy, patients with PRD tended to have a poor performance status compared with non-PRD patients and a higher IMDC risk. Second-line drug therapy was not associated with treatment outcomes in patients with PRD. PRD in patients with mRCC receiving NIVO+IPI as first-line treatment was associated with poor clinical course, even with second-line therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48943,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.16326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) has a long-term response rate of 30% for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, 20% of patients develop primary resistant disease (PRD) to NIVO+IPI and show poor survival outcomes. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of PRD as a second-line treatment in patients with mRCC. The data used in this multi-institutional, retrospective cohort were collected between August 2015 and January 2023. In total, 189 patients with mRCC were treated with NIVO+IPI and then with a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Associations between PRD and progression-free survival of second-line treatment (PFS), progression-free survival 2 (PFS2), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. The median age at NIVO+IPI initiation was 67 years in the male-dominant population (n = 140, 74.1%), and most patients had clear cell histology (n = 140, 74.1%). PRD was recorded in 42 (22.2%) of 189 patients during NIVO+IPI therapy. Patients who experienced PRD showed poor PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.788; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.176-2.718; p = 0.007), PFS2 (HR, 4.127; 95% CI, 2.649-6.431; p < 0.001), and OS (HR, 3.330; 95% CI, 2.040-5.437; p < 0.001). Before starting second-line therapy, patients with PRD tended to have a poor performance status compared with non-PRD patients and a higher IMDC risk. Second-line drug therapy was not associated with treatment outcomes in patients with PRD. PRD in patients with mRCC receiving NIVO+IPI as first-line treatment was associated with poor clinical course, even with second-line therapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼妥珠单抗加伊匹单抗疗法的原发性耐药性会影响转移性肾细胞癌患者的二线治疗效果。
对于转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者来说,Nivolumab加伊匹单抗(NIVO+IPI)的长期应答率为30%。然而,20%的患者会出现对NIVO+IPI的原发性耐药疾病(PRD),并显示出不良的生存结果。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估PRD作为mRCC患者二线治疗的效果。这项多机构回顾性队列研究使用的数据收集于2015年8月至2023年1月。共有189名mRCC患者接受了NIVO+IPI治疗,之后又接受了血管内皮生长因子受体-酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗。研究分析了PRD与二线治疗无进展生存期(PFS)、无进展生存期2(PFS2)和总生存期(OS)之间的关系。在男性为主的人群中,开始接受NIVO+IPI治疗时的中位年龄为67岁(n = 140,74.1%),大多数患者为透明细胞组织学(n = 140,74.1%)。在接受 NIVO+IPI 治疗的 189 例患者中,有 42 例(22.2%)出现了 PRD。出现 PRD 的患者的 PFS(危险比 [HR],1.788;95% 置信区间 [CI],1.176-2.718;P = 0.007)、PFS2(HR,4.127;95% 置信区间 [CI],2.649-6.431;P = 0.007)、PFS3(HR,4.127;95% 置信区间 [CI],2.649-6.431;P = 0.007)和 PFS4(P = 0.007)均较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Science
Cancer Science ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.50%
发文量
406
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Science (formerly Japanese Journal of Cancer Research) is a monthly publication of the Japanese Cancer Association. First published in 1907, the Journal continues to publish original articles, editorials, and letters to the editor, describing original research in the fields of basic, translational and clinical cancer research. The Journal also accepts reports and case reports. Cancer Science aims to present highly significant and timely findings that have a significant clinical impact on oncologists or that may alter the disease concept of a tumor. The Journal will not publish case reports that describe a rare tumor or condition without new findings to be added to previous reports; combination of different tumors without new suggestive findings for oncological research; remarkable effect of already known treatments without suggestive data to explain the exceptional result. Review articles may also be published.
期刊最新文献
Leveraging genome-wide association studies to better understand the etiology of cancers. Rewired chromatin structure and epigenetic gene dysregulation during HTLV-1 infection to leukemogenesis. Diagnosis and typing of leukemia using a single peripheral blood cell through deep learning. NETosis in pulmonary pleomorphic carcinoma. Current status and future direction of cancer research using artificial intelligence for clinical application.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1