Exploring the physical, psychological, and social benefits of adaptive outdoor cycling in persons with stroke using a mixed methods approach.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Disability and Health Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101737
Alexandra L Terrill, Anne V Kirby, Nicole Nagata, Steven Bell, Steven Edgley
{"title":"Exploring the physical, psychological, and social benefits of adaptive outdoor cycling in persons with stroke using a mixed methods approach.","authors":"Alexandra L Terrill, Anne V Kirby, Nicole Nagata, Steven Bell, Steven Edgley","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke is a leading cause of disability world-wide. Community-based adaptive recreation programs may offer a way to enhance quality of life in persons with stroke.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Explore the association between community-based adaptive outdoor cycling program participation and physical, psychological, and social outcomes in persons with stroke using both quantitative and qualitative data collection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Mixed methods design, using prospective longitudinal quantitative data collection during a 16-week adaptive outdoor cycling program (Part 1) and a semi-structured interview/focus group (Part 2). Part 1 included baseline, 8- and 16-weeks assessments of physical, psychological, and social outcomes. Repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) were used to examine within-group changes and effect sizes were calculated. Part 2's transcriptions were coded for physical, psychological, and social outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>30 individuals post-stroke (ages 25-72) were enrolled in Part 1 of the study. ANOVA results showed statistically significant changes in all three areas: physical (resting heart rate, 10-m walk test), psychological (well-being), and social (satisfaction with social roles) outcomes, all with large effect sizes. All other outcomes showed changes in the expected direction but did not reach statistical significance. Findings from qualitative analyses explained and expanded upon quantitative findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results highlight the importance of exploring the influence of adaptive recreation on not only physical but psychological and social outcomes. Due to the exploratory design of this pilot, future research is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101737"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101737","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke is a leading cause of disability world-wide. Community-based adaptive recreation programs may offer a way to enhance quality of life in persons with stroke.

Objective: Explore the association between community-based adaptive outdoor cycling program participation and physical, psychological, and social outcomes in persons with stroke using both quantitative and qualitative data collection.

Methods: Mixed methods design, using prospective longitudinal quantitative data collection during a 16-week adaptive outdoor cycling program (Part 1) and a semi-structured interview/focus group (Part 2). Part 1 included baseline, 8- and 16-weeks assessments of physical, psychological, and social outcomes. Repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) were used to examine within-group changes and effect sizes were calculated. Part 2's transcriptions were coded for physical, psychological, and social outcomes.

Results: 30 individuals post-stroke (ages 25-72) were enrolled in Part 1 of the study. ANOVA results showed statistically significant changes in all three areas: physical (resting heart rate, 10-m walk test), psychological (well-being), and social (satisfaction with social roles) outcomes, all with large effect sizes. All other outcomes showed changes in the expected direction but did not reach statistical significance. Findings from qualitative analyses explained and expanded upon quantitative findings.

Conclusions: The results highlight the importance of exploring the influence of adaptive recreation on not only physical but psychological and social outcomes. Due to the exploratory design of this pilot, future research is warranted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用混合方法,探索适应性户外自行车运动对中风患者的身体、心理和社交益处。
背景:中风是全世界致残的主要原因。以社区为基础的适应性娱乐项目可能是提高中风患者生活质量的一种方法:采用定量和定性数据收集方法,探讨社区适应性户外自行车运动项目的参与与中风患者的身体、心理和社会功能之间的关系:混合方法设计,在为期 16 周的适应性户外骑行项目(第一部分)和半结构式访谈/焦点小组(第二部分)中使用前瞻性纵向定量数据收集。第一部分包括基线、8 周和 16 周的身体、心理和社会结果评估。采用重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)来检验组内变化并计算效应大小。对第二部分的记录进行了身体、心理和社会结果编码:30 名中风后患者(25-72 岁)参加了第一部分研究。方差分析结果显示,身体(静息心率、10 米步行测试)、心理(幸福感)和社交(对社会角色的满意度)这三个方面的结果都发生了统计学意义上的显著变化,且影响大小都很大。所有其他结果都出现了预期方向的变化,但没有达到统计学意义。定性分析结果解释并扩展了定量分析结果:结论:研究结果强调了探索适应性娱乐对生理、心理和社会结果的影响的重要性。由于该试点项目的设计具有探索性,因此未来的研究还很有必要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Health Journal
Disability and Health Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
134
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include: • Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health • Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature • Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs • Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.
期刊最新文献
Intellectual disabilities and risk of cardiovascular diseases: A population-based cohort study. Exhibiting lived experiences of disability in a hospital workplace: A qualitative evaluation. Disability and intimate partner violence experience among women in rural Samoa: A cross-sectional analysis. Exploring the physical, psychological, and social benefits of adaptive outdoor cycling in persons with stroke using a mixed methods approach. History and future directions of DHJO.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1