S. Alexa McDorman , Morgan A. Gilmer , Victoria A. Terry , Ellie K. Taylor-Robinette , John D. Gabrieli , Rachel R. Romeo
{"title":"Parenting relationships as a moderator of how socioeconomic status and household chaos relate to children’s cognitive and socioemotional skills","authors":"S. Alexa McDorman , Morgan A. Gilmer , Victoria A. Terry , Ellie K. Taylor-Robinette , John D. Gabrieli , Rachel R. Romeo","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Low socioeconomic status (SES) and high household chaos are adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) that increase the risk of worse executive functioning (EF) and socioemotional (SE) development. EF and SE skills are foundational for lifelong success, but less is known about how positive childhood experiences (PCEs) such as parenting relationships may buffer the impact of ACEs on these important skills. This study examined how SES and household chaos related to EF and SE skills within the context of varying parenting relationships among a sample of 83 socioeconomically and racially/ethnically diverse 4- to 7-year-old children in the urban United States. SES was associated with children’s lab-based EF, but not survey-based EF or SE skills. Household chaos was related to children’s SE skills, with evidence of full mediation through parenting relationships, but was not related to children’s EF. Although we found evidence of moderation, none of the interactions was in the expected direction. Thus, this study failed to find evidence of parenting relationships as a PCE protective against risk from SES and household chaos for children’s EF and SE skills. However, parenting relationships were more strongly related to children’s survey EF and SE skills than either ACE, indicating the importance of fostering parenting relationships for children’s SE development across risk levels. Results increase our understanding of how positive and adverse childhood experiences relate to child development in a diverse sample and have implications for measurement approaches and family policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":"250 ","pages":"Article 106123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524002637","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Low socioeconomic status (SES) and high household chaos are adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) that increase the risk of worse executive functioning (EF) and socioemotional (SE) development. EF and SE skills are foundational for lifelong success, but less is known about how positive childhood experiences (PCEs) such as parenting relationships may buffer the impact of ACEs on these important skills. This study examined how SES and household chaos related to EF and SE skills within the context of varying parenting relationships among a sample of 83 socioeconomically and racially/ethnically diverse 4- to 7-year-old children in the urban United States. SES was associated with children’s lab-based EF, but not survey-based EF or SE skills. Household chaos was related to children’s SE skills, with evidence of full mediation through parenting relationships, but was not related to children’s EF. Although we found evidence of moderation, none of the interactions was in the expected direction. Thus, this study failed to find evidence of parenting relationships as a PCE protective against risk from SES and household chaos for children’s EF and SE skills. However, parenting relationships were more strongly related to children’s survey EF and SE skills than either ACE, indicating the importance of fostering parenting relationships for children’s SE development across risk levels. Results increase our understanding of how positive and adverse childhood experiences relate to child development in a diverse sample and have implications for measurement approaches and family policy.
社会经济地位低(SES)和家庭混乱是童年的不良经历(ACE),会增加执行功能(EF)和社会情感(SE)发展变差的风险。执行功能和社会情感技能是终生成功的基础,但人们对父母关系等积极的童年经历(PCEs)如何缓冲ACEs对这些重要技能的影响知之甚少。本研究以美国城市地区 83 名社会经济和种族/民族多元化的 4 至 7 岁儿童为样本,研究了在不同的亲子关系背景下,社会经济地位(SES)和家庭混乱与 EF 和 SE 技能的关系。社会经济地位与儿童的实验室测得的EF相关,但与调查测得的EF或SE技能无关。家庭混乱与儿童的自我教育技能有关,有证据表明通过父母关系可以完全调节,但与儿童的EF无关。虽然我们发现了调节的证据,但没有一个交互作用是朝着预期的方向发展的。因此,本研究未能发现证据表明亲子关系作为一种 PCE 对儿童的 EF 和 SE 技能具有保护作用,可抵御来自社会经济地位和家庭混乱的风险。然而,与ACE相比,亲子关系与儿童的EF和SE技能调查有更密切的关系,这表明在不同风险水平下,培养亲子关系对儿童的SE发展非常重要。研究结果加深了我们对不同样本中积极和不良童年经历与儿童发展之间关系的理解,并对测量方法和家庭政策产生了影响。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.