No detrimental effect on the hand microbiome of health care staff by frequent alcohol-based antisepsis.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES American journal of infection control Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2024.11.006
Axel Kramer, Mathilde Borg Dahl, Mia M Bengtsson, John M Boyce, Matthias Heckmann, Mareike Meister, Roald Papke, Didier Pittet, Anne Reinhard, Hortense Slevogt, Haitao Wang, Paula Zwicker, Tim Urich, Ulrike Seifert
{"title":"No detrimental effect on the hand microbiome of health care staff by frequent alcohol-based antisepsis.","authors":"Axel Kramer, Mathilde Borg Dahl, Mia M Bengtsson, John M Boyce, Matthias Heckmann, Mareike Meister, Roald Papke, Didier Pittet, Anne Reinhard, Hortense Slevogt, Haitao Wang, Paula Zwicker, Tim Urich, Ulrike Seifert","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2024.11.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The importance of ethanol-based hand rubs (EBHR) to prevent health care-associated infections is undisputed. However, there is a lack of meaningful data regarding the influence of EBHRs on skin microbiome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four nurses in a neonatal intensive care unit were included. After a leave of 14 days, samples were taken before the first hand rubbing action and at the end of shift, with continued sampling on days 1, 7 and 28. To analyze the hand microbiome, microbial cells were collected using the glove-juice technique. Pro- and eukaryotic community profiles were created using amplicon sequencing of 16S and 18S rRNA gene markers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, hand antisepsis was performed 108 times per 8-hour work shift. Microbial communities were dominated by typical taxa found on human skin. In addition, a clear nurse-specific (i.e. individual) microbiome signature could be observed. For Prokaryota, daily exposure led to the end-of-the-day microbiomes being more similar to each other across nurses. In contrast, longitudinal effect of 28 day-application revealed more similarity of the Eukaryotic community.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Frequent occupational use of EBHR did not adversely affect the composition of the human hand microbiome. Thus, daily hand antisepsis retains its significance as the most important procedure for infection control.</p>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2024.11.006","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The importance of ethanol-based hand rubs (EBHR) to prevent health care-associated infections is undisputed. However, there is a lack of meaningful data regarding the influence of EBHRs on skin microbiome.

Methods: Four nurses in a neonatal intensive care unit were included. After a leave of 14 days, samples were taken before the first hand rubbing action and at the end of shift, with continued sampling on days 1, 7 and 28. To analyze the hand microbiome, microbial cells were collected using the glove-juice technique. Pro- and eukaryotic community profiles were created using amplicon sequencing of 16S and 18S rRNA gene markers.

Results: On average, hand antisepsis was performed 108 times per 8-hour work shift. Microbial communities were dominated by typical taxa found on human skin. In addition, a clear nurse-specific (i.e. individual) microbiome signature could be observed. For Prokaryota, daily exposure led to the end-of-the-day microbiomes being more similar to each other across nurses. In contrast, longitudinal effect of 28 day-application revealed more similarity of the Eukaryotic community.

Conclusions: Frequent occupational use of EBHR did not adversely affect the composition of the human hand microbiome. Thus, daily hand antisepsis retains its significance as the most important procedure for infection control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经常用酒精消毒不会对医护人员的手部微生物群产生不利影响。
背景:乙醇擦手液(EBHR)对预防医护相关感染的重要性毋庸置疑。然而,关于乙醇擦手液对皮肤微生物组的影响却缺乏有意义的数据:方法:研究对象包括新生儿重症监护室的四名护士。休假 14 天后,在第一次擦手之前和下班时采集样本,并在第 1、7 和 28 天继续采集样本。为了分析手部微生物群,使用手套汁液技术收集了微生物细胞。通过对 16S 和 18S rRNA 基因标记进行扩增子测序,绘制了原核和真核生物群落图谱:结果:平均每个 8 小时工作班进行 108 次手消毒。微生物群落以人类皮肤上的典型类群为主。此外,还可以观察到明显的护士特异性(即个体)微生物群特征。就原核生物群而言,每天接触会导致不同护士的日终微生物组更为相似。相比之下,使用 28 天的纵向效应则显示出真核生物群落的更大相似性:结论:频繁使用 EBHR 不会对人体手部微生物组的组成产生不利影响。因此,日常手部防腐作为最重要的感染控制程序仍具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
期刊最新文献
Letter to the editor on National trends and disparities in herpes zoster vaccination among US older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 2008 to 2022. Response to the letter to the editor on "National trends and disparities in herpes zoster vaccination among US older adults with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2008 to 2022". Response to the letter to the editor regarding "The efficacy of an alcohol-based nasal antiseptic versus mupirocin or an iodophor for preventing SSIs using a meta-analysis". Clinical impact of active screening cultures for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: A systematic review and meta-analysis. A survey of infection prevention and animal-assisted activity policies in health care facilities-United States, 2023.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1