Family planning impact on medical students’ surgery interest and current policies in the United States: A scoping review

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American journal of surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116086
Sophia Dittrich , Madeline Ebert , Grace Elizabeth Lawson , Kimberly M. Ramonell , Sophie Dream
{"title":"Family planning impact on medical students’ surgery interest and current policies in the United States: A scoping review","authors":"Sophia Dittrich ,&nbsp;Madeline Ebert ,&nbsp;Grace Elizabeth Lawson ,&nbsp;Kimberly M. Ramonell ,&nbsp;Sophie Dream","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.116086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Previous reviews have examined female residents' experiences while ante- and postpartum. However, to our knowledge, no review exists that synthesizes medical students’ perception of family planning during surgical residencies. We wanted to synthesize current literature on the perceptions of family planning of medical students interested in surgical fields and current medical school policies or resources related to family planning.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A scoping review was performed of databases including MEDLINE (OVID), Scopus, and PubMed in April and September of 2023. Studies were excluded if they were conducted outside the US, occurred before 2003, were opinions, reviews, or editorials, included only non-surgical specialties, focused on only attending years or training years after medical school, and only mentioned “work/life balance” or “lifestyle.”</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>2295 studies were identified, and a final 19 studies were included. Four major themes were identified among the studies, including family planning as a barrier to a career in surgery, fertility, onsite childcare, and parental leave. Most studies examined general barriers medical students perceive about surgery and included at least one survey question related to family planning. Only two studies focused solely on medical students’ knowledge of oocyte preservation, one on on-site childcare at medical schools and one on parental leave during medical school.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is a lack of research examining medical students’ knowledge of family planning during a surgical residency and current childbearing policies and resources offered during residency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"241 ","pages":"Article 116086"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000296102400638X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Previous reviews have examined female residents' experiences while ante- and postpartum. However, to our knowledge, no review exists that synthesizes medical students’ perception of family planning during surgical residencies. We wanted to synthesize current literature on the perceptions of family planning of medical students interested in surgical fields and current medical school policies or resources related to family planning.

Methods

A scoping review was performed of databases including MEDLINE (OVID), Scopus, and PubMed in April and September of 2023. Studies were excluded if they were conducted outside the US, occurred before 2003, were opinions, reviews, or editorials, included only non-surgical specialties, focused on only attending years or training years after medical school, and only mentioned “work/life balance” or “lifestyle.”

Results

2295 studies were identified, and a final 19 studies were included. Four major themes were identified among the studies, including family planning as a barrier to a career in surgery, fertility, onsite childcare, and parental leave. Most studies examined general barriers medical students perceive about surgery and included at least one survey question related to family planning. Only two studies focused solely on medical students’ knowledge of oocyte preservation, one on on-site childcare at medical schools and one on parental leave during medical school.

Conclusion

There is a lack of research examining medical students’ knowledge of family planning during a surgical residency and current childbearing policies and resources offered during residency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计划生育对医科学生手术兴趣的影响以及美国的现行政策:范围审查。
简介以往的综述研究了女性住院医师在产前和产后的经历。然而,据我们所知,目前还没有综述医学生在外科实习期间对计划生育的看法。我们希望综合目前的文献资料,了解对外科领域感兴趣的医学生对计划生育的看法,以及医学院目前与计划生育相关的政策或资源:我们在 2023 年 4 月和 9 月对 MEDLINE (OVID)、Scopus 和 PubMed 等数据库进行了范围审查。如果研究是在美国境外进行的,发生在 2003 年之前,是观点、评论或社论,只包括非外科专业,只关注医学院毕业后的就读年限或培训年限,以及只提及 "工作/生活平衡 "或 "生活方式",则排除在外。这些研究确定了四大主题,包括作为外科职业障碍的计划生育、生育、现场育儿和育儿假。大多数研究探讨了医学生对外科职业的一般看法,并包含至少一个与计划生育相关的调查问题。只有两项研究仅关注医学生对卵母细胞保存的了解,一项是关于医学院的现场儿童保育,另一项是关于医学院期间的育儿假:结论:目前缺乏对医学生在外科实习期间对计划生育的了解以及实习期间提供的现行生育政策和资源的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
570
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Family planning impact on medical students’ surgery interest and current policies in the United States: A scoping review Risk factors and outcomes of cardiac arrest in pediatric traumatic brain injury patients The criticality of reasonable accommodations: A scoping review revealing gaps in care for patients with blindness and low vision Re-operation following urgent and emergent colectomies: An investigation of indications and utility as a quality indicator Impressions of inclusivity within orthopedic surgery: Differences amongst women, minority, and LGBTQIA medical students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1