Can smartphone cameras help with diagnostic adequacy in renal biopsy?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Acta radiologica Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1177/02841851241295393
Mehmet Karagulle, Sıbel Hamarat Gulcicek, Emin Taha Keskin
{"title":"Can smartphone cameras help with diagnostic adequacy in renal biopsy?","authors":"Mehmet Karagulle, Sıbel Hamarat Gulcicek, Emin Taha Keskin","doi":"10.1177/02841851241295393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this prospective study, we evaluated whether a sufficient number of glomeruli were achieved using the 8× magnification of smartphone cameras.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To increase the percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy (PURB) diagnostic value with a method that has not been tried before and reduce the need for repetition of the procedure.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A total of 39 adult patients who underwent PURB were included in our study. After the PURB was applied to the patients, the biopsy specimen was placed on the previously prepared sterile gauze. At this stage, 8× magnification photos were taken of the biopsy samples using the smartphone camera. The glomeruli in the photograph were counted and recorded and compared with the number of glomeruli seen at the end of the histopathological examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean number of glomeruli in the evaluated samples was counted as 6 ± 2.2 (range = 1-10) in the 8× magnification photograph. The mean number of glomeruli detected in the histopathological examination of these samples was 11 ± 5.7 (range = 2-30). A pathological glomeruli count of 10 was associated with more than five brown spots in the 8× magnification photograph (area under the curve = 0.977, <i>P</i>=0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To obtain more than 10 glomeruli in a PURB specimen, five or more brownish-red dots should be counted on the 8x magnification photograph. Using smartphones as an alternative tool for evaluating renal biopsy tissue adequacy can be practical and advantageous in terms of time and labor.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851241295393"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851241295393","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In this prospective study, we evaluated whether a sufficient number of glomeruli were achieved using the 8× magnification of smartphone cameras.

Purpose: To increase the percutaneous ultrasound-guided renal biopsy (PURB) diagnostic value with a method that has not been tried before and reduce the need for repetition of the procedure.

Material and methods: A total of 39 adult patients who underwent PURB were included in our study. After the PURB was applied to the patients, the biopsy specimen was placed on the previously prepared sterile gauze. At this stage, 8× magnification photos were taken of the biopsy samples using the smartphone camera. The glomeruli in the photograph were counted and recorded and compared with the number of glomeruli seen at the end of the histopathological examination.

Results: The mean number of glomeruli in the evaluated samples was counted as 6 ± 2.2 (range = 1-10) in the 8× magnification photograph. The mean number of glomeruli detected in the histopathological examination of these samples was 11 ± 5.7 (range = 2-30). A pathological glomeruli count of 10 was associated with more than five brown spots in the 8× magnification photograph (area under the curve = 0.977, P=0.0001).

Conclusion: To obtain more than 10 glomeruli in a PURB specimen, five or more brownish-red dots should be counted on the 8x magnification photograph. Using smartphones as an alternative tool for evaluating renal biopsy tissue adequacy can be practical and advantageous in terms of time and labor.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
智能手机摄像头能否帮助提高肾活检的诊断充分性?
背景:在这项前瞻性研究中,我们评估了使用智能手机摄像头的8倍放大率是否能获得足够数量的肾小球。目的:使用一种以前从未尝试过的方法提高经皮超声引导肾活检(PURB)的诊断价值,并减少重复手术的需要:我们的研究共纳入了 39 名接受 PURB 的成年患者。患者接受 PURB 治疗后,将活检标本放在事先准备好的无菌纱布上。在此阶段,使用智能手机摄像头为活检样本拍摄 8 倍放大率的照片。对照片中的肾小球进行计数和记录,并与组织病理学检查结束时看到的肾小球数量进行比较:结果:在 8 倍放大率的照片中,被评估样本中肾小球的平均数量为 6 ± 2.2(范围 = 1-10)个。组织病理学检查中检测到的肾小球平均数量为 11 ± 5.7(范围 = 2-30)个。病理肾小球数达到 10 个与 8 倍放大照片中出现 5 个以上棕色斑点有关(曲线下面积 = 0.977,P=0.0001):结论:要在 PURB 标本中获得 10 个以上的肾小球,应在 8 倍放大照片上数到五个或五个以上的棕红色点。使用智能手机作为评估肾活检组织充分性的替代工具既实用又省时省力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
期刊最新文献
A combined model integrating radiomics and deep learning based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for classification of brain metastases. Anatomical insights into medial-sided talar dome osteochondral lesions: a comparative analysis of unilateral and bilateral cases and healthy controls using MRI measurements. Can smartphone cameras help with diagnostic adequacy in renal biopsy? Factors related to acute kidney injury after AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy. MR defecography: comparison of HMO system measurement between supine and lateral decubitus patient position.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1