Pain during prolonged sitting in subjects with patellofemoral pain in Dutch physical therapy clinics: an online questionnaire-based analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086958
Martin Ophey, Sophie Frieling, Gino M M J Kerkhoffs, Igor Tak
{"title":"Pain during prolonged sitting in subjects with patellofemoral pain in Dutch physical therapy clinics: an online questionnaire-based analysis.","authors":"Martin Ophey, Sophie Frieling, Gino M M J Kerkhoffs, Igor Tak","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to describe (1) differences between subjects with patellofemoral pain (PFP) with and without pain during prolonged sitting (PDPS), (2) minimum knee flexion angle and time to onset/disappearance of PDPS and (3) differences between those with PDPS at smaller/greater flexion angles and with fast/slow onset and disappearance of PDPS.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Patient-reported online questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Private physical therapy clinics in the Netherlands between May 2021 and March 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>87 participants (61 (70%) females, mean age 22.0 years (IQR 4.0), body mass index 23.1 (4.7)).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Visual Analogue Scale for worst pain (VAS-W) and sitting pain (VAS-W sitting), the Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS), knee flexion angle to provoke PDPS and time to onset/disappearance of PDPS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>63 of 87 (72%) participants reported PDPS. Participants with PDPS experienced bilateral symptoms of PFP more frequently (71% vs 46%, p=0.44) and scored 12 points lower on the AKPS (p<0.001). Most participants (85%) reported a minimum knee flexion angle of ≥90°, median time to PDPS onset of 16-20 min and 6-10 min for disappearance. Participants experiencing PDPS at smaller flexion angles exhibited higher VAS-W and VAS-W sitting scores (7.0 (1.0), 6.8 (1.1)) than those at greater flexion angles (5.0 (3.0), for both) (p=0.002, p=0.001). Participants with fast onset of PDPS reported higher VAS-W and VAS-W sitting scores (7.0 (2.0), 6.0 (2.0)) than those with slow onset (5.0 (3.0), 5.0 (4.0)) (p<0.001, p=0.025).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants with PDPS reported higher levels of disability than those without. PDPS was typically induced at knee flexion of ≥90°, with delayed onset/disappearance. Higher pain levels were reported by those experiencing PDPS at smaller knee flexion angles or with faster onset. Future research should explore the mechanisms of PDPS and develop targeted interventions to improve long-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"14 11","pages":"e086958"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086958","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to describe (1) differences between subjects with patellofemoral pain (PFP) with and without pain during prolonged sitting (PDPS), (2) minimum knee flexion angle and time to onset/disappearance of PDPS and (3) differences between those with PDPS at smaller/greater flexion angles and with fast/slow onset and disappearance of PDPS.

Design: Patient-reported online questionnaire.

Setting: Private physical therapy clinics in the Netherlands between May 2021 and March 2023.

Participants: 87 participants (61 (70%) females, mean age 22.0 years (IQR 4.0), body mass index 23.1 (4.7)).

Outcome measures: Visual Analogue Scale for worst pain (VAS-W) and sitting pain (VAS-W sitting), the Anterior Knee Pain Scale (AKPS), knee flexion angle to provoke PDPS and time to onset/disappearance of PDPS.

Results: 63 of 87 (72%) participants reported PDPS. Participants with PDPS experienced bilateral symptoms of PFP more frequently (71% vs 46%, p=0.44) and scored 12 points lower on the AKPS (p<0.001). Most participants (85%) reported a minimum knee flexion angle of ≥90°, median time to PDPS onset of 16-20 min and 6-10 min for disappearance. Participants experiencing PDPS at smaller flexion angles exhibited higher VAS-W and VAS-W sitting scores (7.0 (1.0), 6.8 (1.1)) than those at greater flexion angles (5.0 (3.0), for both) (p=0.002, p=0.001). Participants with fast onset of PDPS reported higher VAS-W and VAS-W sitting scores (7.0 (2.0), 6.0 (2.0)) than those with slow onset (5.0 (3.0), 5.0 (4.0)) (p<0.001, p=0.025).

Conclusions: Participants with PDPS reported higher levels of disability than those without. PDPS was typically induced at knee flexion of ≥90°, with delayed onset/disappearance. Higher pain levels were reported by those experiencing PDPS at smaller knee flexion angles or with faster onset. Future research should explore the mechanisms of PDPS and develop targeted interventions to improve long-term outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
荷兰物理治疗诊所髌骨股骨痛患者久坐时的疼痛:基于在线问卷的分析。
研究目的本研究旨在描述:(1) 伴有和不伴有久坐时疼痛(PDPS)的髌骨股骨痛(PFP)患者之间的差异;(2) 膝关节最小屈曲角度和 PDPS 开始/消失的时间;(3) 在较小/较大屈曲角度下出现 PDPS 的患者之间的差异,以及 PDPS 开始和消失快/慢的患者之间的差异:设计:患者报告在线问卷调查:参与者:87人(女性61人(70%),平均年龄22.0岁(IQR 4.0),体重指数23.1(4.7)):结果测量:最严重疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS-W)和坐位疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS-W 坐位)、膝关节前侧疼痛量表(AKPS)、引发 PDPS 的膝关节屈曲角度以及 PDPS 开始/消失的时间:结果:87 名参与者中有 63 人(72%)报告了 PDPS。患有 PDPS 的参与者更经常出现双侧 PFP 症状(71% 对 46%,P=0.44),AKPS 得分低 12 分(P 结论:患有 PDPS 的参与者报告的双侧 PFP 症状更高(71% 对 46%,P=0.44):PDPS患者的残疾程度高于非PDPS患者。PDPS通常在膝关节屈曲≥90°时诱发,延迟发生/消失。膝关节屈曲角度较小或起病较快时,PDPS 患者的疼痛程度较高。未来的研究应探索 PDPS 的机制,并制定有针对性的干预措施,以改善长期疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Effect of antenatal care attendance on maternal and birth outcomes in Somaliland: a cohort study. Distribution disparities among medical specialists in Thailand: an equity analysis of the national health workforce database (2015-2024). Open-label randomised controlled trial of aripiprazole/sertraline combination in comparison with quetiapine for the clinical and cost-effectiveness of treatment of bipolar depression (the ASCEnD study): study protocol. Do sociodemographic variables influence sexual dysfunction in young people with type 1 diabetes? A quantitative study in Poland. Excitatory amino acid inhibitors in adults with acute moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1