Which reference groups matter for Taiwanese high school adolescent smoking? A card sorting study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Open Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081807
Han-Yi Tsai, Shu-Fang Shih, Tzu-I Tsai
{"title":"Which reference groups matter for Taiwanese high school adolescent smoking? A card sorting study.","authors":"Han-Yi Tsai, Shu-Fang Shih, Tzu-I Tsai","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescence represents a pivotal period for the initiation of smoking behaviours. While family, peer and social groups serve as significant reference groups influencing adolescents' decision-making process, there remains a paucity of research that examines how diversified reference groups influence their smoking decisions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective is to compare normative and informative influences given by different reference groups on adolescents' smoking decision-making.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This study applied reference group theory and used the card sorting technique. Adolescents were presented with 16 cards portraying various reference groups and 27 cards portraying different types of reference group influences. They were asked to construct sentences as smoking-elicited and smoking-inhibited cues and ranked these influences based on their relevance to their smoking decision-making.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The participants were recruited from four cities in the North, Central, South and East regions of Taiwan. The study sample consisted of 297 Taiwanese 11th graders drawn from high schools, vocational high schools and night schools.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome measures: </strong>The most influential reference group among smokers, former smokers and never smokers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results of multivariable logistic regression show that for current smokers, having a smoking best friend (aOR=7.58, <i>p</i><0.01), having a smoking colleague (aOR=3.83, <i>p</i><0.01) and participating in ceremonial dance performances (aOR=4.62, <i>p</i><0.01) are more likely to smoke. Peers play an important role in providing smoking-elicited cues for current smokers. Families provided the most smoking-inhibited cues for former and never smokers. Normative influences such as encouraging adolescent smoking provided more cues for adolescents than informative influences such as releasing stress by smoking.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adolescent smoking behaviour was influenced by peer norms, while former and non-smoking behaviours are associated with family norms. Therefore, tobacco prevention efforts should focus more on family-level interventions to discourage smoking initiation. Smoking cessation programmes for current smokers should address the reduction of peer pressure to smoke. Moreover, schools and community partners should collaborate to develop effective smoking cessation strategies, particularly for high-risk groups such as adolescents who involved in ceremonial dance performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":"14 11","pages":"e081807"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081807","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adolescence represents a pivotal period for the initiation of smoking behaviours. While family, peer and social groups serve as significant reference groups influencing adolescents' decision-making process, there remains a paucity of research that examines how diversified reference groups influence their smoking decisions.

Objective: The objective is to compare normative and informative influences given by different reference groups on adolescents' smoking decision-making.

Design: This study applied reference group theory and used the card sorting technique. Adolescents were presented with 16 cards portraying various reference groups and 27 cards portraying different types of reference group influences. They were asked to construct sentences as smoking-elicited and smoking-inhibited cues and ranked these influences based on their relevance to their smoking decision-making.

Participants: The participants were recruited from four cities in the North, Central, South and East regions of Taiwan. The study sample consisted of 297 Taiwanese 11th graders drawn from high schools, vocational high schools and night schools.

Primary outcome measures: The most influential reference group among smokers, former smokers and never smokers.

Results: Our results of multivariable logistic regression show that for current smokers, having a smoking best friend (aOR=7.58, p<0.01), having a smoking colleague (aOR=3.83, p<0.01) and participating in ceremonial dance performances (aOR=4.62, p<0.01) are more likely to smoke. Peers play an important role in providing smoking-elicited cues for current smokers. Families provided the most smoking-inhibited cues for former and never smokers. Normative influences such as encouraging adolescent smoking provided more cues for adolescents than informative influences such as releasing stress by smoking.

Conclusions: Adolescent smoking behaviour was influenced by peer norms, while former and non-smoking behaviours are associated with family norms. Therefore, tobacco prevention efforts should focus more on family-level interventions to discourage smoking initiation. Smoking cessation programmes for current smokers should address the reduction of peer pressure to smoke. Moreover, schools and community partners should collaborate to develop effective smoking cessation strategies, particularly for high-risk groups such as adolescents who involved in ceremonial dance performance.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哪些参照群体对台湾高中青少年吸烟有影响?卡片分类研究
背景:青少年时期是开始吸烟行为的关键时期。虽然家庭、同龄人和社会群体是影响青少年决策过程的重要参照群体,但有关多元化参照群体如何影响青少年吸烟决策的研究仍然很少:目的:比较不同参照群体对青少年吸烟决策的规范性和信息性影响:本研究运用参照群体理论和卡片排序技术。向青少年展示了 16 张描绘不同参照群体的卡片和 27 张描绘不同参照群体影响类型的卡片。他们被要求将句子构造成吸烟诱因和吸烟抑制诱因,并根据这些影响因素与他们吸烟决策的相关性对其进行排序:参与者来自台湾北部、中部、南部和东部的四个城市。研究样本包括来自高中、职业高中和夜校的 297 名台湾 11 年级学生:吸烟者、曾经吸烟者和从不吸烟者中最具影响力的参照群体:多变量逻辑回归结果表明,对于当前吸烟者而言,有一个吸烟的好朋友(aOR=7.58,ppp结论:青少年吸烟行为受周围环境的影响:青少年吸烟行为受到同伴规范的影响,而曾经吸烟和不吸烟行为则与家庭规范有关。因此,烟草预防工作应更加注重家庭层面的干预措施,以阻止青少年开始吸烟。针对当前吸烟者的戒烟计划应减少同伴的吸烟压力。此外,学校和社区合作伙伴应合作制定有效的戒烟策略,尤其是针对高危人群,如参与仪式舞蹈表演的青少年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Top 10 priorities for problematic hip replacement research: a priority setting partnership led by the British Hip Society and the James Lind Alliance. Barriers and facilitators to implementing a shared decision-making tool for anticoagulant-related drug-drug interactions: a qualitative study across three academic medical centres in the USA. Peer network approaches for improving HIV testing, prevention and care utilisation among men in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review. Treatment gaps in guideline-directed medical therapy for HFrEF in Singapore: findings from a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Correction: 'Family functionality and its association with non-communicable diseases among urban adults in Selangor, Malaysia: a cross-sectional study'.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1