Effect of combined treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation compared to monotherapy for the treatment of chronic insomnia: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, controlled trial.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1186/s12916-024-03751-y
Qi Zhou, Zhiwang Liu, Chang Yu, Qiao Wang, Wenhao Zhuang, Yafang Tang, Tianming Zheng, Haihang Yu, Dongsheng Zhou
{"title":"Effect of combined treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation compared to monotherapy for the treatment of chronic insomnia: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, controlled trial.","authors":"Qi Zhou, Zhiwang Liu, Chang Yu, Qiao Wang, Wenhao Zhuang, Yafang Tang, Tianming Zheng, Haihang Yu, Dongsheng Zhou","doi":"10.1186/s12916-024-03751-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic insomnia increases the risk of various health problems and mental illness. Existing research suggests promise for both transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating chronic insomnia individually. However, the combined effects of tDCS and rTMS on this condition remain unclear. This study aimed to verify the efficacy and safety of tDCS combined with rTMS for the treatment of adult patients with chronic insomnia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomised double-blind parallel-group controlled study. Overall, 157 participants with chronic insomnia were randomly assigned to one of three neurotherapy regimens: tDCS + rTMS, sham tDCS + rTMS, or tDCS + sham rTMS. All groups received 20 treatment sessions over 4 consecutive weeks. The primary outcome was the change in patients' sleep as assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months of follow-up. The secondary outcome was the assessment of different dimensions of depression and anxiety in patients through the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), as well as the occurrence of adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Throughout the intervention and after the 3-month follow-up, the tDCS + rTMS group had significantly reduced total PSQI scores compared with the other two groups [tDCS + rTMS, 9.21 vs. sham tDCS + rTMS, 10.03; difference - 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), - 1.82 to - 0.38; p = 0.003; tDCS + rTMS, 9.21 vs. tDCS + sham rTMS, 10.76; difference - 2.14; 95% CI, - 2.90 to - 1.38; p < 0.001; sham tDCS + rTMS, 10.03 vs. tDCS + sham rTMS, 10.76; difference - 1.04; 95% CI, - 1.82 to - 0.26; p = 0.010), indicating improved overall sleep quality. Total HAMD and insomnia factor scores were significantly lower in the tDCS + rTMS group than in the other two groups after treatment (p < 0.05). Notably, no adverse events or serious adverse reactions were observed during the study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining tDCS with rTMS effectively relieved insomnia symptoms, achieving a significant therapeutic effect after 2-week of intervention, and demonstrating the persistence of treatment effects in later follow-up, emphasising the advantages of combination therapy in improving treatment stability and long-term benefits, reflecting the rapid and effective augmentation of combination therapy. This combined therapy may serve as a safe and effective treatment for adults with chronic insomnia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered as a clinical trial with the China Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR2100052681).</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"538"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03751-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic insomnia increases the risk of various health problems and mental illness. Existing research suggests promise for both transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in treating chronic insomnia individually. However, the combined effects of tDCS and rTMS on this condition remain unclear. This study aimed to verify the efficacy and safety of tDCS combined with rTMS for the treatment of adult patients with chronic insomnia.

Methods: This was a randomised double-blind parallel-group controlled study. Overall, 157 participants with chronic insomnia were randomly assigned to one of three neurotherapy regimens: tDCS + rTMS, sham tDCS + rTMS, or tDCS + sham rTMS. All groups received 20 treatment sessions over 4 consecutive weeks. The primary outcome was the change in patients' sleep as assessed by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) at 2 weeks, 4 weeks, and 3 months of follow-up. The secondary outcome was the assessment of different dimensions of depression and anxiety in patients through the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), as well as the occurrence of adverse events.

Results: Throughout the intervention and after the 3-month follow-up, the tDCS + rTMS group had significantly reduced total PSQI scores compared with the other two groups [tDCS + rTMS, 9.21 vs. sham tDCS + rTMS, 10.03; difference - 1.10; 95% confidence interval (CI), - 1.82 to - 0.38; p = 0.003; tDCS + rTMS, 9.21 vs. tDCS + sham rTMS, 10.76; difference - 2.14; 95% CI, - 2.90 to - 1.38; p < 0.001; sham tDCS + rTMS, 10.03 vs. tDCS + sham rTMS, 10.76; difference - 1.04; 95% CI, - 1.82 to - 0.26; p = 0.010), indicating improved overall sleep quality. Total HAMD and insomnia factor scores were significantly lower in the tDCS + rTMS group than in the other two groups after treatment (p < 0.05). Notably, no adverse events or serious adverse reactions were observed during the study period.

Conclusions: Combining tDCS with rTMS effectively relieved insomnia symptoms, achieving a significant therapeutic effect after 2-week of intervention, and demonstrating the persistence of treatment effects in later follow-up, emphasising the advantages of combination therapy in improving treatment stability and long-term benefits, reflecting the rapid and effective augmentation of combination therapy. This combined therapy may serve as a safe and effective treatment for adults with chronic insomnia.

Trial registration: This study was registered as a clinical trial with the China Clinical Trial Registration Center (ChiCTR2100052681).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经颅直流电刺激和重复经颅磁刺激联合疗法与单一疗法治疗慢性失眠的效果对比:随机、双盲、平行组对照试验。
背景:长期失眠会增加各种健康问题和精神疾病的风险:长期失眠会增加各种健康问题和精神疾病的风险。现有研究表明,经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)都有望单独治疗慢性失眠症。然而,经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和经颅磁刺激(rTMS)联合治疗慢性失眠症的效果尚不明确。本研究旨在验证 tDCS 联合经颅磁刺激治疗成年慢性失眠症患者的有效性和安全性:这是一项随机双盲平行组对照研究。共有 157 名慢性失眠患者被随机分配到三种神经治疗方案中的一种:tDCS + rTMS、假 tDCS + rTMS 或 tDCS + 假 rTMS。所有治疗组均在连续 4 周内接受 20 次治疗。主要结果是在随访 2 周、4 周和 3 个月时,通过匹兹堡睡眠质量指数 (PSQI) 评估患者的睡眠变化。次要结果是通过汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)和汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)评估患者抑郁和焦虑的不同维度,以及不良事件的发生情况:在整个干预过程中和 3 个月的随访后,tDCS + rTMS 组的 PSQI 总分与其他两组相比显著降低[tDCS + rTMS,9.21 vs. 假 tDCS + rTMS,10.tDCS+rTMS,9.21 vs. 假 tDCS + rTMS,10.76;差异 - 2.14;95% 置信区间 (CI),- 2.90 至 - 1.38;p = 0.003 结论:将 tDCS 与 rTMS 结合使用可显著降低 PSQI 总分:tDCS与经颅磁刺激联合治疗可有效缓解失眠症状,在干预2周后取得显著疗效,并在后期随访中显示出治疗效果的持续性,强调了联合疗法在提高治疗稳定性和长期疗效方面的优势,体现了联合疗法快速有效的增强作用。这种联合疗法可作为成人慢性失眠症患者的一种安全有效的治疗方法:本研究已在中国临床试验注册中心注册为临床试验(ChiCTR2100052681)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of geriatric rehabilitation in inpatient and day hospital settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Estimation of physiological aging based on routine clinical biomarkers: a prospective cohort study in elderly Chinese and the UK Biobank. Prevalence and uptake of vaping among people who have quit smoking: a population study in England, 2013-2024. Economic costs attributable to modifiable risk factors: an analysis of 24 million urban residents in China. Longitudinal decline in DAT binding in Parkinson's disease: connections with sleep disturbances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1