Impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators on mortality in heart failure receiving quadruple guideline-directed medical therapy: a propensity score-matched study.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMC Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1186/s12916-024-03761-w
Anil Sahin, Ahmet Celik, Dilek Ural, Inci Tugce Colluoglu, Naim Ata, Emine Arzu Kanik, Mustafa Mahir Ulgu, Suayip Birinci, Mehmet Birhan Yilmaz
{"title":"Impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators on mortality in heart failure receiving quadruple guideline-directed medical therapy: a propensity score-matched study.","authors":"Anil Sahin, Ahmet Celik, Dilek Ural, Inci Tugce Colluoglu, Naim Ata, Emine Arzu Kanik, Mustafa Mahir Ulgu, Suayip Birinci, Mehmet Birhan Yilmaz","doi":"10.1186/s12916-024-03761-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the contemporary management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), the recommended quadruple guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) consists of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), evidence-based beta-blockers (BB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i). This study explored the impact of adding implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy to this comprehensive regimen in HFrEF patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing deidentified data from the National Electronic Database of the Turkish Ministry of Health, we conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study on 5450 HFrEF patients receiving quadruple GDMT, including ARNI. Among them, 709 patients underwent additional ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation. Propensity score matching ensured balanced baseline characteristics between groups. Primary endpoint was determined as all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the matched cohort, all-cause mortality occurred in 108 out of 619 patients (17.4%) in the GDMT group and 101 out of 619 patients (16.3%) in the ICD group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.74 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 0.57 to 0.98. The median follow-up time was 1365 days in the matched cohort, 1283 days in the GDMT group. Subgroup analyses consistently demonstrated benefits, particularly among individuals aged 61 years and older (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.42-0.87, p = 0.006), those with sinus rhythm (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.34-0.89, p = 0.013), individuals not using amiodarone (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.42-0.89, p = 0.011), and those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate lower than 61.9 (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.48-0.91, p = 0.011).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study may offer a glimmer of hope that even after achieving the best current optimal medical therapy, the addition of device therapy could still yield positive outcomes in the management of patients with HFrEF.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"539"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-024-03761-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the contemporary management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), the recommended quadruple guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) consists of angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), evidence-based beta-blockers (BB), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA), and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i). This study explored the impact of adding implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy to this comprehensive regimen in HFrEF patients.

Methods: Utilizing deidentified data from the National Electronic Database of the Turkish Ministry of Health, we conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study on 5450 HFrEF patients receiving quadruple GDMT, including ARNI. Among them, 709 patients underwent additional ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation. Propensity score matching ensured balanced baseline characteristics between groups. Primary endpoint was determined as all-cause mortality.

Results: In the matched cohort, all-cause mortality occurred in 108 out of 619 patients (17.4%) in the GDMT group and 101 out of 619 patients (16.3%) in the ICD group, with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.74 and a 95% confidence interval (CI) ranging from 0.57 to 0.98. The median follow-up time was 1365 days in the matched cohort, 1283 days in the GDMT group. Subgroup analyses consistently demonstrated benefits, particularly among individuals aged 61 years and older (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.42-0.87, p = 0.006), those with sinus rhythm (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.34-0.89, p = 0.013), individuals not using amiodarone (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.42-0.89, p = 0.011), and those with an estimated glomerular filtration rate lower than 61.9 (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.48-0.91, p = 0.011).

Conclusions: This study may offer a glimmer of hope that even after achieving the best current optimal medical therapy, the addition of device therapy could still yield positive outcomes in the management of patients with HFrEF.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植入式心律转复除颤器对接受四重指南指导的心力衰竭患者死亡率的影响:倾向评分匹配研究。
背景:在射血分数降低型心力衰竭(HFrEF)的现代治疗中,推荐的四联指导性药物疗法(GDMT)包括血管紧张素受体-去甲肾上腺素抑制剂(ARNI)、循证β受体阻滞剂(BB)、矿物质皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)和钠-葡萄糖共转运体-2抑制剂(SGLT-2i)。本研究探讨了在这一综合治疗方案中加入植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗对高房颤患者的影响:利用土耳其卫生部国家电子数据库中的去身份化数据,我们对 5450 名接受四联 GDMT(包括 ARNI)治疗的 HFrEF 患者进行了一项全国性回顾性队列研究。其中,709 名患者接受了额外的 ICD 或心脏再同步治疗除颤器(CRT-D)植入。倾向评分匹配确保了组间基线特征的平衡。主要终点为全因死亡率:在匹配队列中,GDMT 组 619 名患者中有 108 人(17.4%)全因死亡,ICD 组 619 名患者中有 101 人(16.3%)全因死亡,危险比 (HR) 为 0.74,95% 置信区间 (CI) 为 0.57 至 0.98。配对队列的中位随访时间为 1365 天,GDMT 组为 1283 天。013)、未使用胺碘酮者(HR:0.61,95% CI:0.42-0.89,p = 0.011)和估计肾小球滤过率低于 61.9 者(HR:0.66,95% CI:0.48-0.91,p = 0.011):这项研究为我们带来了一线希望,即即使在达到目前最佳的药物治疗效果后,加用器械治疗仍能为心衰患者的治疗带来积极的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
期刊最新文献
Diastolic dysfunction and risks of heart failure and death in long-term adult cancer survivors. Health impacts of takeaway management zones around schools in six different local authorities across England: a public health modelling study using PRIMEtime. Effect of combined treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation compared to monotherapy for the treatment of chronic insomnia: a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, controlled trial. Impact of implantable cardioverter defibrillators on mortality in heart failure receiving quadruple guideline-directed medical therapy: a propensity score-matched study. Impact of medication nonadherence and drug-drug interaction testing on the management of primary care patients with polypharmacy: a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1