Bleeding risk using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with anticoagulants after venous thromboembolism: a nationwide Danish study.

IF 37.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae736
Søren Riis Petersen, Kasper Bonnesen, Erik Lerkevang Grove, Lars Pedersen, Morten Schmidt
{"title":"Bleeding risk using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with anticoagulants after venous thromboembolism: a nationwide Danish study.","authors":"Søren Riis Petersen, Kasper Bonnesen, Erik Lerkevang Grove, Lars Pedersen, Morten Schmidt","doi":"10.1093/eurheartj/ehae736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The bleeding risk of using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients treated with oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nationwide cohort study of 51 794 VTE patients initiating oral anticoagulants between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2022 was conducted. Time-dependent multivariate cause-specific Cox regression was used to compute adjusted hazard ratios between NSAID use and hospital-diagnosed bleeding episodes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Event rates for any bleeding per 100 person-years were 3.5 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.4-3.7] during periods without NSAID use and 6.3 (95% CI, 5.1-7.9) during periods with NSAID use (number needed to harm = 36 patients treated for 1 year). Compared with non-use, the adjusted hazard ratios for any bleeding associated with NSAID use were 2.09 (95% CI, 1.67-2.62) overall, 1.79 (95% CI, 1.36-2.36) for ibuprofen, 3.30 (95% CI, 1.82-5.97) for diclofenac, and 4.10 (95% CI, 2.13-7.91) for naproxen. Compared with non-use, the adjusted hazard ratios associated with NSAID use were 2.24 (95% CI, 1.61-3.11) for gastrointestinal bleeding, 3.22 (95% CI, 1.69-6.14) for intracranial bleeding, 1.36 (95% CI, .67-2.77) for thoracic and respiratory tract bleeding, 1.57 (95% CI, .98-2.51) for urinary tract bleeding, and 2.99 (95% CI, 1.45-6.18) for anaemia caused by bleeding. Results were consistent for anticoagulant and VTE subtypes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients treated with oral anticoagulants for VTE had a more than two-fold increased bleeding rate when using NSAIDs. This increased bleeding rate was not restricted to the gastrointestinal tract.</p>","PeriodicalId":11976,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":37.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae736","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: The bleeding risk of using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in patients treated with oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains unclear.

Methods: A nationwide cohort study of 51 794 VTE patients initiating oral anticoagulants between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2022 was conducted. Time-dependent multivariate cause-specific Cox regression was used to compute adjusted hazard ratios between NSAID use and hospital-diagnosed bleeding episodes.

Results: Event rates for any bleeding per 100 person-years were 3.5 [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.4-3.7] during periods without NSAID use and 6.3 (95% CI, 5.1-7.9) during periods with NSAID use (number needed to harm = 36 patients treated for 1 year). Compared with non-use, the adjusted hazard ratios for any bleeding associated with NSAID use were 2.09 (95% CI, 1.67-2.62) overall, 1.79 (95% CI, 1.36-2.36) for ibuprofen, 3.30 (95% CI, 1.82-5.97) for diclofenac, and 4.10 (95% CI, 2.13-7.91) for naproxen. Compared with non-use, the adjusted hazard ratios associated with NSAID use were 2.24 (95% CI, 1.61-3.11) for gastrointestinal bleeding, 3.22 (95% CI, 1.69-6.14) for intracranial bleeding, 1.36 (95% CI, .67-2.77) for thoracic and respiratory tract bleeding, 1.57 (95% CI, .98-2.51) for urinary tract bleeding, and 2.99 (95% CI, 1.45-6.18) for anaemia caused by bleeding. Results were consistent for anticoagulant and VTE subtypes.

Conclusions: Patients treated with oral anticoagulants for VTE had a more than two-fold increased bleeding rate when using NSAIDs. This increased bleeding rate was not restricted to the gastrointestinal tract.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
静脉血栓栓塞后使用非甾体抗炎药和抗凝剂的出血风险:一项全国性的丹麦研究。
背景和目的:静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)口服抗凝药物治疗患者使用非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)的出血风险仍不明确:对2012年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间开始口服抗凝药的51 794名VTE患者进行了全国性队列研究。采用时间依赖性多变量特定病因 Cox 回归计算非甾体抗炎药使用与医院诊断出血发作之间的调整后危险比:在未使用非甾体抗炎药期间,每 100 人年的任何出血事件发生率为 3.5 [95% 置信区间 (CI),3.4-3.7];在使用非甾体抗炎药期间,每 100 人年的任何出血事件发生率为 6.3 (95% CI,5.1-7.9)(伤害所需人数 = 36 名接受 1 年治疗的患者)。与不使用相比,与使用非甾体抗炎药相关的任何出血的调整后危险比总体为 2.09(95% CI,1.67-2.62),布洛芬为 1.79(95% CI,1.36-2.36),双氯芬酸为 3.30(95% CI,1.82-5.97),萘普生为 4.10(95% CI,2.13-7.91)。与不使用相比,使用非甾体抗炎药与胃肠道出血的调整后危险比为 2.24(95% CI,1.61-3.11),与颅内出血的调整后危险比为 3.22(95% CI,1.69-6.14),与胃肠道出血的调整后危险比为 1.36(95% CI,0.67-2.77),泌尿道出血为 1.57(95% CI,0.98-2.51),出血引起的贫血为 2.99(95% CI,1.45-6.18)。抗凝剂和 VTE 亚型的结果一致:结论:使用口服抗凝剂治疗 VTE 的患者在使用非甾体抗炎药时出血率增加了两倍多。这种出血率的增加并不局限于胃肠道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal
European Heart Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
39.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
3942
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal is a renowned international journal that focuses on cardiovascular medicine. It is published weekly and is the official journal of the European Society of Cardiology. This peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing high-quality clinical and scientific material pertaining to all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. It covers a diverse range of topics including research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. Moreover, the journal serves as a platform for the exchange of information and discussions on various aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational matters. In addition to original papers on cardiovascular medicine and surgery, the European Heart Journal also presents reviews, clinical perspectives, ESC Guidelines, and editorial articles that highlight recent advancements in cardiology. Additionally, the journal actively encourages readers to share their thoughts and opinions through correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Non-bacterial thrombotic endocarditis: a clinical and pathophysiological reappraisal A European network to develop virtual twin technology for personalized stroke management in atrial fibrillation: the TARGET consortium. Elevated serum xylitol levels and cardiovascular risk: an active component or an innocent bystander? Erythritol and xylitol and cardiovascular disease risk: a growing concern. Gold standard: Karin Sipido honoured for pioneering work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1