Fever management in children and insights into fever of unknown origin: a survey among Italian pediatricians.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS Frontiers in Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fped.2024.1452226
Elena Chiappini, Michela Orlandi, Alberto Chiarugi, Antonio Di Mauro, Antonella Insalaco, Gregorio Paolo Milani, Monica Vallini, Andrea Lo Vecchio
{"title":"Fever management in children and insights into fever of unknown origin: a survey among Italian pediatricians.","authors":"Elena Chiappini, Michela Orlandi, Alberto Chiarugi, Antonio Di Mauro, Antonella Insalaco, Gregorio Paolo Milani, Monica Vallini, Andrea Lo Vecchio","doi":"10.3389/fped.2024.1452226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fever is a common symptom in children, but despite existing guidelines, pediatricians may not fully apply recommendations. Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO) is generally referred to as an unexplained prolonged fever. However, a standardized FUO definition and management is missing.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To collect updated data on the approach to fever and FUO among Italian pediatricians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional anonymous survey was conducted among a large sample of primary care and hospital pediatricians. The panel group formulated and proposed a practical FUO definition, using a modified Delphi approach. A 75% consensus was required to reach an agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 620 respondents, paracetamol was the first-choice antipyretic for 97.7% of participants, followed by ibuprofen; 38.4% prescribed antipyretics based on a specific body temperature rather than on child's discomfort, while physical methods were almost completely abandoned. Alternate treatment was recommended by 19.8% (123/620) of participants, 16.9% (105/620) would prescribe antipyretics to prevent adverse events following immunization. Regarding FUO diagnosis, 58.3% (362/620) considered as cut-off a body temperature above 38°C; the duration required was one week according to 36.45% (226/620) of participants, two weeks according to 35.32% (219/620). The FUO definition proposed by the expert panel reached 81% of consent. Large agreement was observed on first-level laboratory and instrumental investigations in the diagnostic evaluation of FUO, whereas more discrepancies arose on second and third-level investigations. Compared to what participants reported for the treatment of non-prolonged fever, a significant decrease in the prescription of paracetamol as first-choice drug in children with FUO was observed (80.5%; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Interestingly, 39% of participants would empirically recommend antibiotics, 13.7% steroids, and 4.5% Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) for persistent FUO.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-recommended behaviors in fever management persist among pediatricians, including alternating use of paracetamol and ibuprofen, and their prophylactic use for vaccinations. Our data confirm the variability in the definition, work-up, and management of FUO. We observed that in children with FUO paracetamol was significantly less commonly preferred than in non-prolonged fever, which is not supported by evidence. Our findings combined with evidence from existing literature underlined the need for future consensus documents.</p>","PeriodicalId":12637,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","volume":"12 ","pages":"1452226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563795/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2024.1452226","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fever is a common symptom in children, but despite existing guidelines, pediatricians may not fully apply recommendations. Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO) is generally referred to as an unexplained prolonged fever. However, a standardized FUO definition and management is missing.

Objective: To collect updated data on the approach to fever and FUO among Italian pediatricians.

Methods: A cross-sectional anonymous survey was conducted among a large sample of primary care and hospital pediatricians. The panel group formulated and proposed a practical FUO definition, using a modified Delphi approach. A 75% consensus was required to reach an agreement.

Results: Among 620 respondents, paracetamol was the first-choice antipyretic for 97.7% of participants, followed by ibuprofen; 38.4% prescribed antipyretics based on a specific body temperature rather than on child's discomfort, while physical methods were almost completely abandoned. Alternate treatment was recommended by 19.8% (123/620) of participants, 16.9% (105/620) would prescribe antipyretics to prevent adverse events following immunization. Regarding FUO diagnosis, 58.3% (362/620) considered as cut-off a body temperature above 38°C; the duration required was one week according to 36.45% (226/620) of participants, two weeks according to 35.32% (219/620). The FUO definition proposed by the expert panel reached 81% of consent. Large agreement was observed on first-level laboratory and instrumental investigations in the diagnostic evaluation of FUO, whereas more discrepancies arose on second and third-level investigations. Compared to what participants reported for the treatment of non-prolonged fever, a significant decrease in the prescription of paracetamol as first-choice drug in children with FUO was observed (80.5%; P < 0.0001). Interestingly, 39% of participants would empirically recommend antibiotics, 13.7% steroids, and 4.5% Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) for persistent FUO.

Conclusion: Non-recommended behaviors in fever management persist among pediatricians, including alternating use of paracetamol and ibuprofen, and their prophylactic use for vaccinations. Our data confirm the variability in the definition, work-up, and management of FUO. We observed that in children with FUO paracetamol was significantly less commonly preferred than in non-prolonged fever, which is not supported by evidence. Our findings combined with evidence from existing literature underlined the need for future consensus documents.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿童发烧管理及对不明原因发烧的见解:意大利儿科医生调查。
背景:发热是儿童的常见症状,但尽管已有指南,儿科医生可能并没有完全执行这些建议。不明原因发热(FUO)一般指原因不明的长期发热。然而,目前还没有统一的 FUO 定义和处理方法:收集意大利儿科医生处理发烧和不明原因发烧的最新数据:方法:对基层医疗机构和医院的儿科医生进行了一项横向匿名调查。小组采用改良德尔菲法制定并提出了实用的 FUO 定义。结果:在 620 名受访者中,97.7% 的受访者首选扑热息痛,其次是布洛芬;38.4% 的受访者根据特定体温而不是儿童的不适症状开具退烧药处方,而物理方法几乎被完全放弃。19.8%的参与者(123/620)建议采用替代疗法,16.9%的参与者(105/620)会处方退烧药以预防免疫接种后的不良反应。关于 FUO 诊断,58.3%(362/620)的参与者认为体温超过 38°C 是体温升高的分界线;36.45%(226/620)的参与者认为体温升高需要持续一周,35.32%(219/620)的参与者认为体温升高需要持续两周。专家小组提出的 FUO 定义获得了 81% 的同意。在对 FUO 的诊断评估中,一级实验室和仪器检查结果的一致性较高,而二级和三级检查结果的差异较大。与参与者报告的非长期发热治疗方法相比,FUO患儿首选扑热息痛处方的比例明显下降(80.5%;P 结论:FUO患儿的发热治疗方法中不推荐的行为显著减少:儿科医生在处理发烧时仍存在非推荐行为,包括交替使用扑热息痛和布洛芬,以及在接种疫苗时预防性使用扑热息痛和布洛芬。我们的数据证实了在 FUO 的定义、检查和管理方面存在差异。我们观察到,在 FUO 患儿中,扑热息痛的使用率明显低于非长期发热患儿,而这并无证据支持。我们的发现与现有文献中的证据相结合,强调了未来共识文件的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pediatrics
Frontiers in Pediatrics Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
2132
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pediatrics (Impact Factor 2.33) publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research broadly across the field, from basic to clinical research that meets ongoing challenges in pediatric patient care and child health. Field Chief Editors Arjan Te Pas at Leiden University and Michael L. Moritz at the Children''s Hospital of Pittsburgh are supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. Frontiers in Pediatrics also features Research Topics, Frontiers special theme-focused issues managed by Guest Associate Editors, addressing important areas in pediatrics. In this fashion, Frontiers serves as an outlet to publish the broadest aspects of pediatrics in both basic and clinical research, including high-quality reviews, case reports, editorials and commentaries related to all aspects of pediatrics.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Nurses' attitudes, behaviors, and barriers toward pressure ulcer prevention in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units. Ketogenic diets therapy in the management of epileptic spasms syndrome. Acute pancreatitis following asparaginase treatment in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia with a heterozygous SPINK1 c.194 + 2T>C intronic variant: a case report. Biological effects of combinations of structurally diverse human milk oligosaccharides. Cerebrospinal fluid neurofilament light chain levels in children with acquired demyelinating syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1