Exploring the impact of body mass index on the accuracy of vertebral bone quality in determining bone mineral density in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research Pub Date : 2024-11-17 DOI:10.1186/s13018-024-05195-9
Xuan Zhao, Qijun Wang, Peng Wang, Chao Kong, Shibao Lu
{"title":"Exploring the impact of body mass index on the accuracy of vertebral bone quality in determining bone mineral density in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.","authors":"Xuan Zhao, Qijun Wang, Peng Wang, Chao Kong, Shibao Lu","doi":"10.1186/s13018-024-05195-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate whether body mass index (BMI) affects the accuracy of vertebral bone quality (VBQ) in determining bone mineral density (BMD) in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, patients with preoperative noncontrast T1-weighted MRI were included. Restricted Cubic Spline (RCS) was employed to explore the nonlinear relationship between BMI and VBQ. Then patients were stratified according to the threshold of BMI. Pearson correlation analysis and linear regression were used to analyze the correlation between VBQ and the BMD in different groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess diagnostic efficacy according to BMI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 328 patients (201 female and 127 male patients) with a mean age of 68.3 ± 3.3 years were included in the study. Significant nonlinear relationship was observed given the results of RCS. In patients with BMI < 23.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, the correlation coefficient between VBQ and the lowest BMD was - 0.32 and significant distribution difference of VBQ score was observed between osteoporosis and normal as well as osteopenia subgroups. However, in patients with BMI ≥ 23.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, the correlation coefficient between VBQ and the lowest BMD was - 0.39 and significant distribution difference of VBQ score was observed in all three subgroups. In addition, the ROC analysis revealed that the predictive performance in determining low BMD was superior in patients with BMI ≥ 23.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (AUC 0.80 vs. AUC 0.66, p = 0.034).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, significant nonlinear relationship between BMI and VBQ was observed. Compared with patients with BMI < 23.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, VBQ has better discrimination between higher BMI (≥ 23.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) patients with low BMD and those with normal bone density.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"19 1","pages":"763"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05195-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether body mass index (BMI) affects the accuracy of vertebral bone quality (VBQ) in determining bone mineral density (BMD) in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery.

Methods: In this retrospective study, patients with preoperative noncontrast T1-weighted MRI were included. Restricted Cubic Spline (RCS) was employed to explore the nonlinear relationship between BMI and VBQ. Then patients were stratified according to the threshold of BMI. Pearson correlation analysis and linear regression were used to analyze the correlation between VBQ and the BMD in different groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess diagnostic efficacy according to BMI.

Results: A total of 328 patients (201 female and 127 male patients) with a mean age of 68.3 ± 3.3 years were included in the study. Significant nonlinear relationship was observed given the results of RCS. In patients with BMI < 23.8 kg/m2, the correlation coefficient between VBQ and the lowest BMD was - 0.32 and significant distribution difference of VBQ score was observed between osteoporosis and normal as well as osteopenia subgroups. However, in patients with BMI ≥ 23.8 kg/m2, the correlation coefficient between VBQ and the lowest BMD was - 0.39 and significant distribution difference of VBQ score was observed in all three subgroups. In addition, the ROC analysis revealed that the predictive performance in determining low BMD was superior in patients with BMI ≥ 23.8 kg/m2 (AUC 0.80 vs. AUC 0.66, p = 0.034).

Conclusions: In this study, significant nonlinear relationship between BMI and VBQ was observed. Compared with patients with BMI < 23.8 kg/m2, VBQ has better discrimination between higher BMI (≥ 23.8 kg/m2) patients with low BMD and those with normal bone density.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨体重指数对腰椎融合手术患者脊椎骨质量准确性的影响,以确定骨矿密度。
目的:研究体重指数(BMI)是否会影响腰椎融合手术患者椎骨质量(VBQ)测定骨矿密度(BMD)的准确性:研究体重指数(BMI)是否会影响腰椎融合手术患者椎骨质量(VBQ)测定骨矿密度(BMD)的准确性:在这项回顾性研究中,纳入了术前接受非对比 T1 加权 MRI 检查的患者。采用受限立方样条曲线(RCS)探讨 BMI 与 VBQ 之间的非线性关系。然后根据 BMI 临界值对患者进行分层。采用皮尔逊相关分析和线性回归分析不同组别中 VBQ 与 BMD 之间的相关性。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)分析法计算曲线下面积(AUC),根据体重指数评估诊断效果:研究共纳入 328 名患者(201 名女性和 127 名男性),平均年龄为 68.3 ± 3.3 岁。在 RCS 结果中观察到了显著的非线性关系。在体重指数为 2 的患者中,VBQ 与最低 BMD 之间的相关系数为-0.32,并且在骨质疏松症与正常和骨质疏松症亚组之间观察到 VBQ 分数的显著分布差异。然而,在体重指数≥ 23.8 kg/m2 的患者中,VBQ 与最低 BMD 之间的相关系数为-0.39,并且在所有三个亚组中均观察到 VBQ 分数的显著分布差异。此外,ROC分析显示,BMI≥23.8 kg/m2的患者对低BMD的预测能力更强(AUC 0.80 vs. AUC 0.66,p = 0.034):本研究观察到 BMI 与 VBQ 之间存在明显的非线性关系。与 BMI 值为 2 的患者相比,VBQ 对 BMI 值较高(≥ 23.8 kg/m2)但骨密度较低的患者和骨密度正常的患者有更好的分辨能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
期刊最新文献
Exosomes secreted from human-derived adipose stem cells prevent progression of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Risk factors of short-term residual low back pain after PKP for the first thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Correction: Oblique lateral internal fusion combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in severe lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical and radiographic outcome. Forearm bone mineral density as a predictor of adjacent vertebral refracture after percutaneous kyphoplasty in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a retrospective analysis. Global incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery in adolescents: a meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1