Risk Evaluation of Progression of Proteinuria and Renal Decline Based on a Novel Subgroup Classification in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine Diabetes Therapy Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1007/s13300-024-01667-7
Kai Wang, Qi Qian, Chencheng Bian, Pei Sheng, Lin Zhu, Shichao Teng, Xiaofei An
{"title":"Risk Evaluation of Progression of Proteinuria and Renal Decline Based on a Novel Subgroup Classification in Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.","authors":"Kai Wang, Qi Qian, Chencheng Bian, Pei Sheng, Lin Zhu, Shichao Teng, Xiaofei An","doi":"10.1007/s13300-024-01667-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a highly heterogeneous disease with a varying risk of complications. The recent novel subgroup classification using cluster analysis contributed to the risk evaluation of diabetic complications. However, whether the subgroup classification strategy could be adopted to predict the risk of onset and progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in Chinese individuals with T2DM remains to be elucidated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 612 Chinese patients with T2DM were enrolled, and the median follow-up time was 3.5 years. The T2DM subgroups were categorized by a two-step cluster analysis based on five parameters, including age at onset of diabetes, body mass index (BMI), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), homeostasis model assessment 2 of insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR), and homeostasis model assessment 2 of β-cell function (HOMA2-β). Clinical characteristics across subgroups were compared using t-tests and chi-square tests. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression models were adopted to assess the risk of albuminuria progression and renal function decline among different subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort was categorized into four groups: severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD), with 146 patients (23.9%); mild insulin resistance (MIRD), with 81 patients (13.2%); moderate glycemic control diabetes (MGCD), with 211 patients (34.5%); and moderate weight insulin deficiency diabetes (MWIDD), with 174 patients (28.4%). The MIRD group exhibited an increased risk of progression from non-albuminuria to albuminuria as compared with the MWIDD group, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 2.92 (1.06, 8.04). The SIDD group had a higher risk of progression from micro-albuminuria to macro-albuminuria as compared with the MGCD group, with an adjusted OR and 95% CI of 3.39 (1.01, 11.41). There was no significant difference in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline among all groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study offered the first evidence for risk evaluation of the development of DKD in the novel cluster-based T2DM Chinese subgroups. It suggested that the MIRD subgroup had a higher risk of DKD onset than the MWIDD subgroup. Meanwhile, the SIDD subgroup showed a higher risk of progression of albuminuria than the MGCD subgroup. This novel classification system could be effective in predicting the risk of DKD in Chinese patients with T2DM, which could facilitate the implementation of personalized therapeutic strategies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300077183).</p>","PeriodicalId":11192,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-024-01667-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a highly heterogeneous disease with a varying risk of complications. The recent novel subgroup classification using cluster analysis contributed to the risk evaluation of diabetic complications. However, whether the subgroup classification strategy could be adopted to predict the risk of onset and progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) in Chinese individuals with T2DM remains to be elucidated.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 612 Chinese patients with T2DM were enrolled, and the median follow-up time was 3.5 years. The T2DM subgroups were categorized by a two-step cluster analysis based on five parameters, including age at onset of diabetes, body mass index (BMI), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), homeostasis model assessment 2 of insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR), and homeostasis model assessment 2 of β-cell function (HOMA2-β). Clinical characteristics across subgroups were compared using t-tests and chi-square tests. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression models were adopted to assess the risk of albuminuria progression and renal function decline among different subgroups.

Results: The cohort was categorized into four groups: severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD), with 146 patients (23.9%); mild insulin resistance (MIRD), with 81 patients (13.2%); moderate glycemic control diabetes (MGCD), with 211 patients (34.5%); and moderate weight insulin deficiency diabetes (MWIDD), with 174 patients (28.4%). The MIRD group exhibited an increased risk of progression from non-albuminuria to albuminuria as compared with the MWIDD group, with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 2.92 (1.06, 8.04). The SIDD group had a higher risk of progression from micro-albuminuria to macro-albuminuria as compared with the MGCD group, with an adjusted OR and 95% CI of 3.39 (1.01, 11.41). There was no significant difference in the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) decline among all groups.

Conclusion: The present study offered the first evidence for risk evaluation of the development of DKD in the novel cluster-based T2DM Chinese subgroups. It suggested that the MIRD subgroup had a higher risk of DKD onset than the MWIDD subgroup. Meanwhile, the SIDD subgroup showed a higher risk of progression of albuminuria than the MGCD subgroup. This novel classification system could be effective in predicting the risk of DKD in Chinese patients with T2DM, which could facilitate the implementation of personalized therapeutic strategies.

Trial registration: This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300077183).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于新型亚组分类的中国 2 型糖尿病患者蛋白尿进展和肾功能衰退的风险评估
简介2 型糖尿病(T2DM)是一种高度异质性疾病,并发症风险各不相同。最近采用聚类分析法进行的新型亚组分类有助于糖尿病并发症的风险评估。然而,能否采用亚组分类策略来预测中国 T2DM 患者糖尿病肾病(DKD)的发病和进展风险仍有待阐明:在这项回顾性研究中,共纳入了 612 名中国 T2DM 患者,中位随访时间为 3.5 年。根据糖尿病发病年龄、体重指数(BMI)、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估2(HOMA2-IR)和β细胞功能稳态模型评估2(HOMA2-β)等五项参数,采用两步聚类分析法对T2DM亚组进行了分类。采用 t 检验和卡方检验比较了不同亚组的临床特征。此外,还采用多变量逻辑回归模型评估不同亚组的白蛋白尿进展和肾功能下降风险:结果:队列分为四组:重度胰岛素缺乏糖尿病(SIDD),146 例(23.9%);轻度胰岛素抵抗(MIRD),81 例(13.2%);中度血糖控制糖尿病(MGCD),211 例(34.5%);中度体重胰岛素缺乏糖尿病(MWIDD),174 例(28.4%)。与中等体重胰岛素缺乏症组相比,中等体重胰岛素缺乏症组从无白蛋白尿发展为白蛋白尿的风险更高,调整后的几率比(OR)和 95% 置信区间(CI)为 2.92(1.06, 8.04)。与 MGCD 组相比,SIDD 组从微量白蛋白尿发展为大量白蛋白尿的风险更高,调整后的 OR 和 95% 置信区间分别为 3.39(1.01,11.41)。各组间肾小球滤过率(GFR)的下降无明显差异:本研究首次为基于聚类的新型 T2DM 中国亚组中 DKD 的发展风险评估提供了证据。研究结果表明,MIRD 亚组的 DKD 发病风险高于 MWIDD 亚组。同时,SIDD 亚组的白蛋白尿进展风险高于 MGCD 亚组。这一新颖的分类系统可有效预测中国T2DM患者发生DKD的风险,从而促进个性化治疗策略的实施:本研究已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(ChiCTR2300077183)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes Therapy
Diabetes Therapy Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
7.90%
发文量
130
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Therapy is an international, peer reviewed, rapid-publication (peer review in 2 weeks, published 3–4 weeks from acceptance) journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of therapeutics and interventions (including devices) across all areas of diabetes. Studies relating to diagnostics and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, communications and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from all over the world. Diabetes Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
期刊最新文献
12-Month Time in Tight Range Improvement with Advanced Hybrid-Closed Loop System in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes. Rationale and Design of the Study to Investigate the Metabolic Action of Imeglimin on Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (SISIMAI). Sodium-Glucose Co-transporter-2 Inhibitors in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: The Framework for Recommendations for Their Potential Use. Current Perspectives in Pre- and Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Diagnosis and Management: An Expert Statement for the Gulf Region. Switching from Premixed Insulin to Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart for the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Implications of a Real-World Study on Insulin Degludec Dosing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1