Breast Cancer Local Recurrence Risk in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Macrotexturized and Microtexturized Prosthesis: A Multicentric Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 0.7 Q4 SURGERY Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-05-30 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1787059
Valeriano Vinci, Francesco Klinger, Riccardo Di Giuli, Andrea Vittorio Emanuele Lisa, Barbara Catania, Stefano Vaccari, Edoardo Caimi, Emanuele Pitassi, Jacopo Di Filippo, Damiano Gentile, Corrado Tinterri, Gerardus Johannes Janszen, Marco Klinger
{"title":"Breast Cancer Local Recurrence Risk in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction with Macrotexturized and Microtexturized Prosthesis: A Multicentric Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Valeriano Vinci, Francesco Klinger, Riccardo Di Giuli, Andrea Vittorio Emanuele Lisa, Barbara Catania, Stefano Vaccari, Edoardo Caimi, Emanuele Pitassi, Jacopo Di Filippo, Damiano Gentile, Corrado Tinterri, Gerardus Johannes Janszen, Marco Klinger","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1787059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>  Nowadays, implant-based breast reconstruction is a common technique after mastectomy. The widespread use of implant employment is prompting significant concerns regarding the oncological safety of prostheses and the potential impact of surface texture on the recurrence of local breast cancer. This article examines the oncological outcomes associated with postmastectomy breast reconstructions using micro- and macrotexturized implants, focusing on the incidence and relative risk (RR). <b>Materials and Methods</b>  A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients admitted to Multimedica group (IRCCS, San Giovanni Hospital, Milan) and ICH groups (Humanitas Clinical Institute, Milan) between January 2003 and September 2020. Minimum follow-up considered was of 1 year. Patients submitted to either complete or nipple-spearing mastectomy, who underwent breast reconstruction with macrotexturized or microtexturized prosthesis, were included in group A and B, respectively. <b>Results</b>  A total of 646 patients met the basic inclusion and exclusion criteria. Group A included 410 (63.5%) patients and group B included 236 (36.5%). Cancer recurrence absolute risk in group A was 5.6 ± 2.2% and in group B was of 2.1 ± 1.8%. RR for breast cancer recurrence in group A compared to group B was of 2.65; confidence interval 95% (1.02; 6.87). Statistical analysis identified a higher local recurrence risk in patients reconstructed with macrotexturized prosthesis ( <i>p</i> -value 0.036). <b>Conclusion</b>  This study detected a higher risk for local breast cancer recurrence associated to macrotexturized breast implants employment. Further investigations are required to verify these outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47204,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery","volume":"57 5","pages":"372-378"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11567768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1787059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background  Nowadays, implant-based breast reconstruction is a common technique after mastectomy. The widespread use of implant employment is prompting significant concerns regarding the oncological safety of prostheses and the potential impact of surface texture on the recurrence of local breast cancer. This article examines the oncological outcomes associated with postmastectomy breast reconstructions using micro- and macrotexturized implants, focusing on the incidence and relative risk (RR). Materials and Methods  A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients admitted to Multimedica group (IRCCS, San Giovanni Hospital, Milan) and ICH groups (Humanitas Clinical Institute, Milan) between January 2003 and September 2020. Minimum follow-up considered was of 1 year. Patients submitted to either complete or nipple-spearing mastectomy, who underwent breast reconstruction with macrotexturized or microtexturized prosthesis, were included in group A and B, respectively. Results  A total of 646 patients met the basic inclusion and exclusion criteria. Group A included 410 (63.5%) patients and group B included 236 (36.5%). Cancer recurrence absolute risk in group A was 5.6 ± 2.2% and in group B was of 2.1 ± 1.8%. RR for breast cancer recurrence in group A compared to group B was of 2.65; confidence interval 95% (1.02; 6.87). Statistical analysis identified a higher local recurrence risk in patients reconstructed with macrotexturized prosthesis ( p -value 0.036). Conclusion  This study detected a higher risk for local breast cancer recurrence associated to macrotexturized breast implants employment. Further investigations are required to verify these outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于植入物的乳房再造术中使用巨挤压和微挤压假体的乳腺癌局部复发风险:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
背景 如今,假体乳房重建是乳房切除术后的一种常见技术。植入物的广泛使用引起了人们对假体肿瘤安全性以及表面纹理对局部乳腺癌复发的潜在影响的极大关注。本文研究了乳房切除术后乳房重建使用微型和巨型假体的相关肿瘤学结果,重点关注发病率和相对风险 (RR)。材料与方法 对 2003 年 1 月至 2020 年 9 月期间入住 Multimedica 组(米兰圣乔瓦尼医院 IRCCS)和 ICH 组(米兰 Humanitas 临床研究所)的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。最短随访时间为 1 年。A组和B组分别包括接受乳房全切或乳头剥离乳房切除术的患者,这些患者均接受了大型或微型假体的乳房重建手术。结果 共有 646 名患者符合基本的纳入和排除标准。A组包括410名(63.5%)患者,B组包括236名(36.5%)患者。A 组癌症复发绝对风险为 5.6 ± 2.2%,B 组为 2.1 ± 1.8%。与 B 组相比,A 组乳腺癌复发的 RR 为 2.65;置信区间为 95% (1.02; 6.87)。统计分析表明,使用大体积假体重建的患者局部复发的风险更高(P-值为 0.036)。结论 本研究发现,使用大切口乳房假体的患者局部乳腺癌复发风险较高。要验证这些结果,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
64
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery (ISSN : 0970-0358) is biannual publication of the Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. Bibliographic listings: The journal is indexed with Bioline International, Caspur, DOAJ, EBSCO Publishing’s Electronic Databases, Expanded Academic ASAP, Genamics JournalSeek, Google Scholar, Health & Wellness Research Center, Health Reference Center Academic, Hinari, Index Copernicus, IndMed, OpenJGate, PubMed, Pubmed Central, Scimago Journal Ranking, SCOLOAR, SCOPUS, SIIC databases, SNEMB, Ulrich’s International Periodical Directory
期刊最新文献
A Decade of Transforming Journey with IJPS. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery in India Is Poised for Exponential Growth and Global Dominance. Correction of Gummy Smile: An Essential Procedure in Facial Aesthetics. Gynecomastia: The 4Dx technique. Students Have Changed; Medical Teachers Should Change Too.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1