Postoperative Pain Control After ACL Reconstruction With Semitendinosus Tendon Graft: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Adductor Canal Block to Local Infiltration Analgesia.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-15 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241292604
Sermsak Sumanont, Khananut Jaruwanneechai, Aumjit Wittayapairoj, Punyawat Apiwatanakul, Artit Boonrod
{"title":"Postoperative Pain Control After ACL Reconstruction With Semitendinosus Tendon Graft: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Adductor Canal Block to Local Infiltration Analgesia.","authors":"Sermsak Sumanont, Khananut Jaruwanneechai, Aumjit Wittayapairoj, Punyawat Apiwatanakul, Artit Boonrod","doi":"10.1177/23259671241292604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Both adductor canal block (ACB) and local infiltration (LI) are effective for postoperative pain management after arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). While LI is a more straightforward procedure, its effectiveness remains debated.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate morphine consumption within 48 hours after ACLR with a semitendinosus tendon graft, comparing ACB and LI; secondary objectives: to evaluate pain levels, patient satisfaction, quadriceps strength, range of knee motion, and complications.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing primary ACLR with a semitendinosus tendon graft were randomized to receive either ACB (0.25% bupivacaine; 20 mL) or LI at the surgical wound, graft harvest area, and intra-articular injection. The LI group received morphine (3 mg), ketorolac (30 mg), and tranexamic acid (1 g). Morphine consumption within 48 hours was monitored using an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia device.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 48 patients were analyzed (n = 24 in each group); baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The LI group consumed significantly less morphine than the ACB group at 6 hours (median [interquartile range, IQR], 3 mg [0-4.8 mg] for the LI group vs 5.5 mg [2-9] for the ACB group; <i>P</i> = .003). However, no significant differences were observed in morphine consumption at other time points. Additionally, no significant difference was found in cumulative morphine consumption at 48 hours between the groups (median [IQR], 21.5 mg [11-34.5 mg] for the ACB group vs 16.5 mg [8.5-21.8 mg] for the LI group; <i>P</i> = .137). Postoperative pain scores, quadriceps strength, and patient satisfaction were similar between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Morphine consumption at 48 hours postoperatively was comparable between the LI and ACB groups, and no significant group differences were found in postoperative pain, quadriceps strength, or patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>TCTR20190320003 (Thai Clinical Trial Registry).</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"12 11","pages":"23259671241292604"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11565623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241292604","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Both adductor canal block (ACB) and local infiltration (LI) are effective for postoperative pain management after arthroscopic-assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). While LI is a more straightforward procedure, its effectiveness remains debated.

Purpose: To evaluate morphine consumption within 48 hours after ACLR with a semitendinosus tendon graft, comparing ACB and LI; secondary objectives: to evaluate pain levels, patient satisfaction, quadriceps strength, range of knee motion, and complications.

Study design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods: Patients undergoing primary ACLR with a semitendinosus tendon graft were randomized to receive either ACB (0.25% bupivacaine; 20 mL) or LI at the surgical wound, graft harvest area, and intra-articular injection. The LI group received morphine (3 mg), ketorolac (30 mg), and tranexamic acid (1 g). Morphine consumption within 48 hours was monitored using an intravenous patient-controlled analgesia device.

Results: A total of 48 patients were analyzed (n = 24 in each group); baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The LI group consumed significantly less morphine than the ACB group at 6 hours (median [interquartile range, IQR], 3 mg [0-4.8 mg] for the LI group vs 5.5 mg [2-9] for the ACB group; P = .003). However, no significant differences were observed in morphine consumption at other time points. Additionally, no significant difference was found in cumulative morphine consumption at 48 hours between the groups (median [IQR], 21.5 mg [11-34.5 mg] for the ACB group vs 16.5 mg [8.5-21.8 mg] for the LI group; P = .137). Postoperative pain scores, quadriceps strength, and patient satisfaction were similar between the 2 groups.

Conclusion: Morphine consumption at 48 hours postoperatively was comparable between the LI and ACB groups, and no significant group differences were found in postoperative pain, quadriceps strength, or patient satisfaction.

Registration: TCTR20190320003 (Thai Clinical Trial Registry).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用半腱肌腱移植进行前交叉韧带重建术后疼痛控制:内收肌通道阻滞与局部浸润镇痛的随机对照试验。
背景:在关节镜辅助下进行前交叉韧带(ACL)重建术(ACLR)后,内收肌管阻滞(ACB)和局部浸润(LI)都能有效控制术后疼痛。目的:比较 ACB 和 LI,评估半腱肌腱移植 ACLR 术后 48 小时内的吗啡消耗量;次要目的:评估疼痛程度、患者满意度、股四头肌力量、膝关节活动范围和并发症:研究设计:随机对照试验;证据级别,1.方法:采用半腱肌腱移植物进行初级 ACLR 的患者被随机分为两组,在手术伤口、移植物采集区域和关节内注射 ACB(0.25% 布比卡因;20 mL)或 LI。LI组接受吗啡(3 毫克)、酮咯酸(30 毫克)和氨甲环酸(1 克)治疗。使用静脉患者控制镇痛装置监测 48 小时内的吗啡消耗量:共分析了 48 名患者(每组 24 人);各组的基线特征相似。6小时时,LI组的吗啡消耗量明显少于ACB组(中位数[四分位数间距,IQR],LI组为3毫克[0-4.8毫克],ACB组为5.5毫克[2-9毫克];P = .003)。然而,在其他时间点的吗啡消耗量没有观察到明显差异。此外,两组在 48 小时内的累积吗啡消耗量也无明显差异(中位数[IQR],ACB 组为 21.5 毫克[11-34.5 毫克],LI 组为 16.5 毫克[8.5-21.8 毫克];P = .137)。两组患者的术后疼痛评分、股四头肌力量和患者满意度相似:结论:LI 组和 ACB 组术后 48 小时的吗啡消耗量相当,在术后疼痛、股四头肌力量和患者满意度方面没有发现明显的组间差异:注册:TCTR20190320003(泰国临床试验注册中心)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Imaging Characteristics in Pediatric Patients With Trochlear Versus Medial Femoral Condyle Osteochondritis Dissecans. Investigating the Influence of Modifiable Physical Measures on the Elbow Varus Torque - Ball Velocity Relationship in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers. All-Suture Anchor Onlay Fixation for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Comparison of Fixation Constructs. Graft Failure in Pediatric Patients After Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone, Hamstring Tendon, or Quadriceps Tendon Autograft ACLR: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Return to Activity After Patellofemoral Osteochondral Fracture: A Comparison of Metallic Screw and Bioabsorbable Fixation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1