Factors Influencing Treatment Delays in Trauma Patients: A Three-delay Model Approach.

IF 0.7 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.4103/jets.jets_9_24
Mayank Badkur, Marina Kharkongor, Naveen Sharma, Saurabh Singh, Pushpinder Khera, Ashok Puranik, Mahaveer Singh Rodha
{"title":"Factors Influencing Treatment Delays in Trauma Patients: A Three-delay Model Approach.","authors":"Mayank Badkur, Marina Kharkongor, Naveen Sharma, Saurabh Singh, Pushpinder Khera, Ashok Puranik, Mahaveer Singh Rodha","doi":"10.4103/jets.jets_9_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Identifying factors causing treatment delays is essential for guiding decisions on resource allocation within trauma systems. The three-delay model categorizes delays into: (i) deciding to seek medical care (Phase 1), (ii) recognizing the need for transporting to a medical facility (Phase 2), and (iii) receiving suitable and timely treatment (Phase 3). We seek to investigate factors influencing delays in trauma patients using the three-delay model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an 18-month prospective observational study at a tertiary hospital, involving consenting adults (age >18 years) admitted for various traumas. We conducted a detailed interview and extracted objective patient data from medical records using a predetermined form. We observed and analyzed factors influencing the duration of the three phases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Phase 1 delays were observed in 83 patients, Phase 2 delays in 200 patients, and Phase 3 delays in 233 patients. In Phase 3 delays, a shortage of human resources was the most frequently identified cause of delay, affecting 68 out of 233 patients (29%). In severe trauma cases (injury severity score ≥16), any phase delay showed a significant association with poor outcomes (<i>P</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The three-delay model offers a valuable framework for understanding and pinpointing the factors contributing to delays in both prehospital and inhospital services.</p>","PeriodicalId":15692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","volume":"17 3","pages":"172-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11563228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_9_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Identifying factors causing treatment delays is essential for guiding decisions on resource allocation within trauma systems. The three-delay model categorizes delays into: (i) deciding to seek medical care (Phase 1), (ii) recognizing the need for transporting to a medical facility (Phase 2), and (iii) receiving suitable and timely treatment (Phase 3). We seek to investigate factors influencing delays in trauma patients using the three-delay model.

Methods: We conducted an 18-month prospective observational study at a tertiary hospital, involving consenting adults (age >18 years) admitted for various traumas. We conducted a detailed interview and extracted objective patient data from medical records using a predetermined form. We observed and analyzed factors influencing the duration of the three phases.

Results: Phase 1 delays were observed in 83 patients, Phase 2 delays in 200 patients, and Phase 3 delays in 233 patients. In Phase 3 delays, a shortage of human resources was the most frequently identified cause of delay, affecting 68 out of 233 patients (29%). In severe trauma cases (injury severity score ≥16), any phase delay showed a significant association with poor outcomes (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The three-delay model offers a valuable framework for understanding and pinpointing the factors contributing to delays in both prehospital and inhospital services.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响创伤患者治疗延迟的因素:三延迟模型法
导言:确定导致治疗延误的因素对于指导创伤系统内的资源分配决策至关重要。三延迟模型将延迟分为:(i) 决定就医(第一阶段),(ii) 意识到需要转运到医疗机构(第二阶段),(iii) 接受适当和及时的治疗(第三阶段)。我们试图利用三延迟模型研究影响创伤患者延误的因素:我们在一家三甲医院开展了一项为期 18 个月的前瞻性观察研究,研究对象是因各种创伤入院并同意接受治疗的成年人(年龄大于 18 岁)。我们进行了详细的访谈,并使用预先确定的表格从病历中提取了患者的客观数据。我们观察并分析了影响三个阶段持续时间的因素:结果:第一阶段延误的患者有 83 人,第二阶段延误的患者有 200 人,第三阶段延误的患者有 233 人。在第三阶段延误中,人力资源短缺是最常见的延误原因,233 名患者中有 68 人(29%)受到影响。在严重创伤病例中(受伤严重程度评分≥16),任何阶段的延误都与不良预后有显著关联(P < 0.05):结论:三阶段延误模型为了解和确定院前和院内服务中造成延误的因素提供了一个有价值的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
39 weeks
期刊最新文献
Fatal Case of Organ Ischemia Secondary to Traumatic Stanford Type B Aortic Dissection. Factors Influencing the Time to Fibrinolysis in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Observational Study. From Training to Practice: Addressing the Realities of Critical Care Subspecialty in Rural India. Outcomes of Prehospital versus Emergency Department Intubation in Patients Managed by Emergency Medical Services. Massive Hemothorax Resulting from Blunt Vertebral Fracture.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1