The assessment of adjuvant chemotherapy benefits after D3 lymphadenectomy in patients with colon cancer: a propensity score matching study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Surgery Today Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1007/s00595-024-02965-0
Kiyoaki Sugiura, Kensuke Takebe, Junya Aoyama, Go Oshima, Hiroto Kikuchi, Koji Okabayashi, Satoshi Aiko, Yuko Kitagawa
{"title":"The assessment of adjuvant chemotherapy benefits after D3 lymphadenectomy in patients with colon cancer: a propensity score matching study.","authors":"Kiyoaki Sugiura, Kensuke Takebe, Junya Aoyama, Go Oshima, Hiroto Kikuchi, Koji Okabayashi, Satoshi Aiko, Yuko Kitagawa","doi":"10.1007/s00595-024-02965-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for stage III disease is recognized as a standard treatment and is routinely performed in patients with colon cancer (CC). However, the recommendation for AC is mainly based on studies performed in past environments, where D3 lymphadenectomy was not routinely performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed CC patients who underwent curative resection with D3 lymphadenectomy in Keio Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (K-SEER) database. After patients were divided into AC and non-AC groups, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to match the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After PSM, 84 patients were included in each group. There were no significant differences between the AC and non-AC groups in the 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS; 88.01% vs. 81.46%, p = 0.295) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS; 69.57 vs. 70.08%, p = 0.820), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, AC improved both the CSS [hazard ratio (HR)0.273; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.094-0.797, p = 0.017] and RFS (HR 0.376; 95% CI 0.174-0.806, p = 0.012) only for tumors with N2 disease compared to non-AC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current indications for AC in patients with CC after D3 lymphadenectomy should be reconsidered. It is possible that AC is appropriate only for stage III CC patients with N2 disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-024-02965-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for stage III disease is recognized as a standard treatment and is routinely performed in patients with colon cancer (CC). However, the recommendation for AC is mainly based on studies performed in past environments, where D3 lymphadenectomy was not routinely performed.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed CC patients who underwent curative resection with D3 lymphadenectomy in Keio Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (K-SEER) database. After patients were divided into AC and non-AC groups, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to match the two groups.

Results: After PSM, 84 patients were included in each group. There were no significant differences between the AC and non-AC groups in the 5-year cancer-specific survival (CSS; 88.01% vs. 81.46%, p = 0.295) and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS; 69.57 vs. 70.08%, p = 0.820), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, AC improved both the CSS [hazard ratio (HR)0.273; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.094-0.797, p = 0.017] and RFS (HR 0.376; 95% CI 0.174-0.806, p = 0.012) only for tumors with N2 disease compared to non-AC.

Conclusion: The current indications for AC in patients with CC after D3 lymphadenectomy should be reconsidered. It is possible that AC is appropriate only for stage III CC patients with N2 disease.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估结肠癌患者 D3 淋巴腺切除术后辅助化疗的益处:倾向得分匹配研究。
目的:III期疾病的辅助化疗(AC)是公认的标准治疗方法,也是结肠癌(CC)患者的常规治疗方法。然而,对 AC 的建议主要基于过去环境下的研究,当时并未常规进行 D3 淋巴腺切除术:我们回顾性分析了庆应义塾监测流行病学和最终结果(K-SEER)数据库中接受根治性切除术并行 D3 淋巴腺切除术的 CC 患者。将患者分为AC组和非AC组后,对两组患者进行倾向得分匹配(PSM):结果:经过倾向得分匹配,每组有 84 名患者。AC 组和非 AC 组的 5 年癌症特异性生存率(CSS;88.01% vs. 81.46%,P = 0.295)和 5 年无复发生存率(RFS;69.57 vs. 70.08%,P = 0.820)分别无明显差异。在亚组分析中,与非 AC 相比,AC 只改善了 N2 病变肿瘤的 CSS[危险比(HR)0.273;95% 置信区间(CI)0.094-0.797,p = 0.017]和 RFS(HR 0.376;95% CI 0.174-0.806,p = 0.012):结论:D3淋巴结切除术后的CC患者应重新考虑目前的AC适应症。结论:D3淋巴结切除术后的CC患者目前的AC适应症应重新考虑,AC可能只适用于N2病变的III期CC患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Surgery Today
Surgery Today 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.00%
发文量
208
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it"). The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.
期刊最新文献
The assessment of adjuvant chemotherapy benefits after D3 lymphadenectomy in patients with colon cancer: a propensity score matching study. Learning curve of consolers and bedside surgeons fused robotic-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy: insights from the initial 100 cases. Mechanisms of polyglycolic acid sheet-induced abdominal wall adhesions in hamsters. Evaluation of intestinal wall closure using vessel-sealing technology versus conventional closure: an in vivo study. Postoperative pain management using high-dose oral acetaminophen for enhanced recovery after colorectal cancer surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1