Stability of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Its Relationship with Clinical Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Pub Date : 2024-11-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/COPD.S487063
Minjie Jiang, Yulong Yang, Haoyan Wang
{"title":"Stability of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Its Relationship with Clinical Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Minjie Jiang, Yulong Yang, Haoyan Wang","doi":"10.2147/COPD.S487063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>More studies have focused on the clinical value of the measurement of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). This study aims to assess the stability of NLR in hospitalized AECOPD patients and its relationship with clinical prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study recruited patients hospitalized with AECOPD from January 2020 to December 2023. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, we determined the optimal NLR cutoff, categorizing NLR stability into four groups: persistent high (NLR ≥ 3.8), increased (NLR < 3.8 at admission but ≥ 3.8 at discharge), decreased (NLR ≥ 3.8 at admission but < 3.8 at discharge), and persistent low (NLR < 3.8). Adverse hospital outcomes included hospital mortality, transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU), invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and length of hospital stay (LOS) ≥ 14 days. The associations between NLR stability and these outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and Cox hazard analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 841 patients hospitalized for AECOPD, the mean age was 72.1±9.5 years, with 644 males (76.6%) and 197 females (23.4%). The proportions and distribution for groups: persistent high, decreased, increased, and persistent low groups were 109 (12.9%), 175 (20.8%), 216 (25.7%), and 341 (40.5%), respectively. The persistent high group had the worst outcomes, including higher IMV use, ICU transfer, LOS > 14 days, and hospital cost, compared to the persistent low group. Compared to the persistent high group, the persistent low group (HR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.10-0.24) and the decreased group (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.22-0.73) are statistically significant for the risk of death, while the increased group (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.37-1.04) does not show a statistically significant difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AECOPD patients who have persistent low NLR group face a low risk of adverse hospital outcomes and mortality after 6 months after discharge. The stability of NLR may serve as a novel biomarker for identifying AECOPD patients at increased risk of poor hospital outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48818,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"19 ","pages":"2431-2441"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S487063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: More studies have focused on the clinical value of the measurement of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD). This study aims to assess the stability of NLR in hospitalized AECOPD patients and its relationship with clinical prognosis.

Methods: This retrospective observational study recruited patients hospitalized with AECOPD from January 2020 to December 2023. Using receiver operating characteristic curves, we determined the optimal NLR cutoff, categorizing NLR stability into four groups: persistent high (NLR ≥ 3.8), increased (NLR < 3.8 at admission but ≥ 3.8 at discharge), decreased (NLR ≥ 3.8 at admission but < 3.8 at discharge), and persistent low (NLR < 3.8). Adverse hospital outcomes included hospital mortality, transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU), invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and length of hospital stay (LOS) ≥ 14 days. The associations between NLR stability and these outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and Cox hazard analysis.

Results: Among 841 patients hospitalized for AECOPD, the mean age was 72.1±9.5 years, with 644 males (76.6%) and 197 females (23.4%). The proportions and distribution for groups: persistent high, decreased, increased, and persistent low groups were 109 (12.9%), 175 (20.8%), 216 (25.7%), and 341 (40.5%), respectively. The persistent high group had the worst outcomes, including higher IMV use, ICU transfer, LOS > 14 days, and hospital cost, compared to the persistent low group. Compared to the persistent high group, the persistent low group (HR: 0.13; 95% CI: 0.10-0.24) and the decreased group (HR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.22-0.73) are statistically significant for the risk of death, while the increased group (HR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.37-1.04) does not show a statistically significant difference.

Conclusion: AECOPD patients who have persistent low NLR group face a low risk of adverse hospital outcomes and mortality after 6 months after discharge. The stability of NLR may serve as a novel biomarker for identifying AECOPD patients at increased risk of poor hospital outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性阻塞性肺病急性加重期中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率的稳定性及其与临床结果的关系:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:越来越多的研究关注慢性阻塞性肺疾病(AECOPD)急性加重期中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)测量的临床价值。本研究旨在评估住院 AECOPD 患者 NLR 的稳定性及其与临床预后的关系:这项回顾性观察研究招募了 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间住院的 AECOPD 患者。利用接收器操作特征曲线,我们确定了最佳 NLR 临界值,并将 NLR 稳定性分为四组:持续高(NLR ≥ 3.8)、升高(入院时 NLR < 3.8 但出院时 ≥ 3.8)、降低(入院时 NLR ≥ 3.8 但出院时 < 3.8)和持续低(NLR < 3.8)。不良住院结果包括住院死亡率、转入重症监护室(ICU)、有创机械通气(IMV)和住院时间(LOS)≥14 天。采用多变量逻辑回归和 Cox 危险分析法分析了 NLR 稳定性与这些结果之间的关系:在 841 名因 AECOPD 住院的患者中,平均年龄(72.1±9.5)岁,男性 644 人(76.6%),女性 197 人(23.4%)。持续高血压组、血压下降组、血压升高组和持续低血压组的比例和分布分别为 109(12.9%)、175(20.8%)、216(25.7%)和 341(40.5%)。与持续低血容量组相比,持续高血容量组的结果最差,包括更高的 IMV 使用量、ICU 转院、LOS > 14 天和住院费用。与持续高发组相比,持续低发组(HR:0.13;95% CI:0.10-0.24)和低发组(HR:0.40;95% CI:0.22-0.73)的死亡风险有显著统计学差异,而高发组(HR:0.63;95% CI:0.37-1.04)的死亡风险没有显著统计学差异:结论:持续低 NLR 组的 AECOPD 患者出院 6 个月后出现不良住院结局和死亡的风险较低。NLR的稳定性可作为一种新型生物标志物,用于识别住院预后不良风险增加的AECOPD患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
372
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical studies and reviews in COPD. Special focus will be given to the pathophysiological processes underlying the disease, intervention programs, patient focused education, and self management protocols. This journal is directed at specialists and healthcare professionals
期刊最新文献
Effects of Low-Carbohydrate and Low-Fat Diets on Morbidity and Mortality of COPD. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Hospitalized AECOPDs Secondary to SARS-CoV-2 versus Other Respiratory Viruses. Stability of Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio in Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Its Relationship with Clinical Outcomes: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation versus High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: An Updated Narrative Review. Respiratory Specialist Visits Before Admissions with COPD Exacerbation are Linked to Improved Management and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1