Characteristics of rehabilitation protocols following operative treatment of terrible triad elbow injuries and the influence of early motion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Shoulder and Elbow Pub Date : 2024-08-06 DOI:10.1177/17585732241269807
Joseph Larwa, Timothy R Buchanan, Rachel L Janke, Madison Q Burns, Logan Wright, Kevin A Hao, Robert J Cueto, Keegan M Hones, William R Aibinder, Thomas W Wright, Bradley S Schoch, Joseph J King
{"title":"Characteristics of rehabilitation protocols following operative treatment of terrible triad elbow injuries and the influence of early motion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Joseph Larwa, Timothy R Buchanan, Rachel L Janke, Madison Q Burns, Logan Wright, Kevin A Hao, Robert J Cueto, Keegan M Hones, William R Aibinder, Thomas W Wright, Bradley S Schoch, Joseph J King","doi":"10.1177/17585732241269807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>As no consensus exists on the optimal postoperative rehabilitation protocol in terrible triad injuries, we sought to characterize the reported protocols and relate them to postoperative range of motion (ROM) measures and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify articles on the operative treatment of terrible triad injuries reporting postoperative rehabilitation protocols were included. Included studies were descriptively summarized. Methodologic quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies criteria. Meta-analysis compared postoperative ROM measures and the MEPS between patients initiating passive ROM exercises at ≤7 days vs. >7 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our review included 36 articles with 1123 elbows (66% male, mean age: 43 years, follow-up: 27 months). Of the studies reporting physical therapy protocols, it was most commonly initiated at 7 days postoperatively (6/36, 17%), passive ROM exercises at 7 days (3/25, 12%), and active ROM at 21 days (4/26, 15%). On meta-analysis, early passive ROM initiation was not associated with improved elbow ROM or MEPS.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While rehabilitation protocols commonly advised passive ROM at one week post-operatively, meta-analysis did not support functional benefits of early passive ROM.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic Review; Level of evidence, 4.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732241269807"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11562217/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241269807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As no consensus exists on the optimal postoperative rehabilitation protocol in terrible triad injuries, we sought to characterize the reported protocols and relate them to postoperative range of motion (ROM) measures and Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS).

Methods: A systematic review was performed by searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases to identify articles on the operative treatment of terrible triad injuries reporting postoperative rehabilitation protocols were included. Included studies were descriptively summarized. Methodologic quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies criteria. Meta-analysis compared postoperative ROM measures and the MEPS between patients initiating passive ROM exercises at ≤7 days vs. >7 days.

Results: Our review included 36 articles with 1123 elbows (66% male, mean age: 43 years, follow-up: 27 months). Of the studies reporting physical therapy protocols, it was most commonly initiated at 7 days postoperatively (6/36, 17%), passive ROM exercises at 7 days (3/25, 12%), and active ROM at 21 days (4/26, 15%). On meta-analysis, early passive ROM initiation was not associated with improved elbow ROM or MEPS.

Discussion: While rehabilitation protocols commonly advised passive ROM at one week post-operatively, meta-analysis did not support functional benefits of early passive ROM.

Study design: Systematic Review; Level of evidence, 4.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
可怕的肘关节三联症损伤手术治疗后康复方案的特点及早期运动的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:由于目前尚未就可怕的三联症损伤的最佳术后康复方案达成共识,我们试图描述已报道的方案的特点,并将其与术后活动范围(ROM)测量和梅奥肘关节表现评分(MEPS)联系起来:方法:通过检索PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库,对有关可怕的三联症损伤手术治疗的文章进行了系统回顾,并纳入了术后康复方案的报告。对纳入的研究进行了描述性总结。方法学质量采用非随机研究方法学指数标准进行评估。荟萃分析比较了在≤7天与>7天时开始被动ROM锻炼的患者的术后ROM测量和MEPS:我们的综述包括36篇文章,共涉及1123名肘部患者(66%为男性,平均年龄:43岁,随访时间:27个月)。在报告物理治疗方案的研究中,最常见的是在术后7天开始(6/36,17%),7天时进行被动ROM锻炼(3/25,12%),21天时进行主动ROM锻炼(4/26,15%)。根据荟萃分析,早期开始被动 ROM 与肘关节 ROM 或 MEPS 的改善无关:讨论:虽然康复方案通常建议在术后一周进行被动ROM,但荟萃分析并不支持早期被动ROM对功能的益处:研究设计:系统综述;证据等级,4。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology of acromioclavicular joint separations presenting to emergency departments in the United States between 2004 and 2023. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with bioinductive patch achieves equivalent patient-reported outcomes and retear rate at 1 year. Patterns of management for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: A comparative study of open and arthroscopic approaches. Stress shielding influences shoulder function after reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a short stem at minimum 2 years follow-up and can be predicted using a preoperative planning software: A retrospective cohort study. Response to the Letter-to-the-Editor by Dr H Duansuperwong and Prof. V Wiwanitkit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1