Examining whether method of suicide exposure and closeness to decedent relate to firearm storage practices.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Pub Date : 2024-11-18 DOI:10.1111/sltb.13147
Evan A Albury, Jessica L Gerner, David A Jobes, Raymond P Tucker
{"title":"Examining whether method of suicide exposure and closeness to decedent relate to firearm storage practices.","authors":"Evan A Albury, Jessica L Gerner, David A Jobes, Raymond P Tucker","doi":"10.1111/sltb.13147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>One factor that can influence whether someone will engage in secure firearm storage is having a suicide exposure (SE). Daruwala et al. (2018) examined this and found that individuals with an SE, without considering perceived closeness, did not significantly differ from those who did not have an SE in their firearm storage practices. Thus, the present study aimed to replicate and extend the research of Daruwala et al. (2018) by examining if the method of suicide (by firearm or other means) and closeness of suicide decedent relate to secure firearm storage practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>308 male firearm owners completed self-report measures assessing SE, perceived closeness to decedent, and current firearm storage practices. Chi square and logistic regression analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Suicide loss exposure, regardless of method used in suicide, did not relate to firearm storage practices in this sample. We also found that there was no association between perceived closeness to the decedent who died by suicide by firearm and secure storage, without considering age.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results underscore the difficulty in helping male firearm owners develop personally salient reasons to increase safety with firearms. Implications for clinical care, firearm safety, and public health initiatives are explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":39684,"journal":{"name":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.13147","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: One factor that can influence whether someone will engage in secure firearm storage is having a suicide exposure (SE). Daruwala et al. (2018) examined this and found that individuals with an SE, without considering perceived closeness, did not significantly differ from those who did not have an SE in their firearm storage practices. Thus, the present study aimed to replicate and extend the research of Daruwala et al. (2018) by examining if the method of suicide (by firearm or other means) and closeness of suicide decedent relate to secure firearm storage practices.

Methods: 308 male firearm owners completed self-report measures assessing SE, perceived closeness to decedent, and current firearm storage practices. Chi square and logistic regression analyses were conducted.

Results: Suicide loss exposure, regardless of method used in suicide, did not relate to firearm storage practices in this sample. We also found that there was no association between perceived closeness to the decedent who died by suicide by firearm and secure storage, without considering age.

Conclusions: Results underscore the difficulty in helping male firearm owners develop personally salient reasons to increase safety with firearms. Implications for clinical care, firearm safety, and public health initiatives are explored.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究自杀方式和与死者的亲近程度是否与枪支储存方法有关。
导言:影响一个人是否会安全存放枪支的一个因素是是否有过自杀经历(SE)。Daruwala 等人(2018 年)对此进行了研究,发现在不考虑感知亲密程度的情况下,有 SE 的人与没有 SE 的人在枪支存储做法上没有显著差异。因此,本研究旨在复制和扩展 Daruwala 等人(2018 年)的研究,研究自杀方式(用枪支或其他方式)和自杀死者的亲密程度是否与安全枪支存储做法有关。方法:308 名男性枪支所有者完成了自我报告测量,评估了 SE、与死者的感知亲密程度以及当前的枪支存储做法。结果:无论采用哪种方法,自杀损失风险都与枪支保管方法有关:结果:在这一样本中,无论采用哪种自杀方式,自杀损失风险都与枪支存放方式无关。我们还发现,在不考虑年龄因素的情况下,认为与用枪支自杀身亡者的亲近程度与安全存放枪支之间没有关联:结论:研究结果表明,帮助男性枪支所有者制定提高枪支安全性的个人显著理由存在困难。本文探讨了临床护理、枪支安全和公共卫生措施的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: An excellent resource for researchers as well as students, Social Cognition features reports on empirical research, self-perception, self-concept, social neuroscience, person-memory integration, social schemata, the development of social cognition, and the role of affect in memory and perception. Three broad concerns define the scope of the journal: - The processes underlying the perception, memory, and judgment of social stimuli - The effects of social, cultural, and affective factors on the processing of information - The behavioral and interpersonal consequences of cognitive processes.
期刊最新文献
Development of a peer-delivered lethal means counseling intervention for firearm owning veterans: Peer engagement and exploration of responsibility and safety (PEERS). Risk of self-harm and suicide on reaching the age at which a parent died by suicide or other causes: A Danish, population-based self-controlled case series study. Examining whether method of suicide exposure and closeness to decedent relate to firearm storage practices. An integrated alcohol and suicide intervention for adolescents in inpatient psychiatric treatment. Collaboration and consent in decisions to initiate emergency dispatches for suicide risk: A national qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1