Factors Influencing the Lung Cancer Incidence in China: A Meta-Analysis.

Kaihan Yang, Hongwei Jiang, Lu Deng, Yang Chi, Xueyi Xiao, Shuai Zhang
{"title":"Factors Influencing the Lung Cancer Incidence in China: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Kaihan Yang, Hongwei Jiang, Lu Deng, Yang Chi, Xueyi Xiao, Shuai Zhang","doi":"10.5152/FNJN.2024.23050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate the main factors associated with lung cancer incidence in China and provide reference for developing successful lung cancer interventions and accelerating progress against cancer. All publications related to the influencing factors of lung cancer incidence were retrieved from four databases from their date of inception through September 2022. Eight Medical Subject Headings and corresponding keywords were utilized to identify eligible trials in China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and China Biology Medicine Database (CBM). The heterogeneity test and meta-analysis were conducted using Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.4) software. This study was designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. Fourteen studies, published from 2000 to 2019, have been chosen and incorporated in a meta-analysis. The mean total quality score across the included studies was 7, with a range of 6-8. The findings of the meta-analysis demonstrated that smoking (odds ratio=2.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.94-3.11), passive smoking (odds ratio=2.44, 95% confidence interval: 2.13-2.80), lung/respiratory disease (odds ratio=2.66, 95% confidence interval: 1.82-3.89), family history of tumor (odds ratio=2.79, 95% confidence interval: 1.80-4.32), oil fume (odds ratio=1.91, 95% confidence interval: 1.50-2.43), and psychological factor (odds ratio=2.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.89-2.73) were risk factors for lung cancer, while more fruits and vegetables (odds ratio=0.51, 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.75), exercise (odds ratio=0.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.72), and tea drinking (odds ratio=0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.83) were protective factors for lung cancer. Funnel plot analysis demonstrated the absence of any apparent publication bias. The risk and protective factors influencing the lung cancer incidence are diverse. Considering the research limitations, we should have more research projects to explore the factors that affect lung cancer incidence and explain the research results.</p>","PeriodicalId":73033,"journal":{"name":"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing","volume":"32 2","pages":"198-205"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11332445/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Florence Nightingale journal of nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/FNJN.2024.23050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the study was to systematically evaluate the main factors associated with lung cancer incidence in China and provide reference for developing successful lung cancer interventions and accelerating progress against cancer. All publications related to the influencing factors of lung cancer incidence were retrieved from four databases from their date of inception through September 2022. Eight Medical Subject Headings and corresponding keywords were utilized to identify eligible trials in China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and China Biology Medicine Database (CBM). The heterogeneity test and meta-analysis were conducted using Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.4) software. This study was designed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. Fourteen studies, published from 2000 to 2019, have been chosen and incorporated in a meta-analysis. The mean total quality score across the included studies was 7, with a range of 6-8. The findings of the meta-analysis demonstrated that smoking (odds ratio=2.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.94-3.11), passive smoking (odds ratio=2.44, 95% confidence interval: 2.13-2.80), lung/respiratory disease (odds ratio=2.66, 95% confidence interval: 1.82-3.89), family history of tumor (odds ratio=2.79, 95% confidence interval: 1.80-4.32), oil fume (odds ratio=1.91, 95% confidence interval: 1.50-2.43), and psychological factor (odds ratio=2.27, 95% confidence interval: 1.89-2.73) were risk factors for lung cancer, while more fruits and vegetables (odds ratio=0.51, 95% confidence interval: 0.35-0.75), exercise (odds ratio=0.55, 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.72), and tea drinking (odds ratio=0.52, 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.83) were protective factors for lung cancer. Funnel plot analysis demonstrated the absence of any apparent publication bias. The risk and protective factors influencing the lung cancer incidence are diverse. Considering the research limitations, we should have more research projects to explore the factors that affect lung cancer incidence and explain the research results.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响中国肺癌发病率的因素:Meta分析
本研究旨在系统评估中国肺癌发病的主要相关因素,为制定成功的肺癌干预措施和加快抗癌进程提供参考。本研究从四个数据库中检索了与肺癌发病率影响因素相关的所有文献,检索时间自文献开始发表之日起至2022年9月。利用八个医学主题词和相应的关键词在中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)、万方数据库、中国科技期刊数据库(VIP)和中国生物医学数据库(CBM)中找出符合条件的试验。使用Review Manager(RevMan,5.4版)软件进行异质性检验和荟萃分析。本研究根据《系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols)进行设计。本研究选择了 2000 年至 2019 年间发表的 14 项研究,并将其纳入荟萃分析。纳入研究的平均总质量分为 7 分,范围为 6-8 分。荟萃分析结果表明,吸烟(几率比=2.46,95% 置信区间:1.94-3.11)、被动吸烟(几率比=2.44,95% 置信区间:2.13-2.80)、肺部/呼吸系统疾病(几率比=2.66,95% 置信区间:1.82-3.89)、肿瘤家族史(几率比=2.79,95% 置信区间:1.80-4.32)、油烟(几率比=1.91,95% 置信区间:1.多吃水果和蔬菜(几率比=0.51,95% 置信区间:0.35-0.75)、运动(几率比=0.55,95% 置信区间:0.43-0.72)和饮茶(几率比=0.52,95% 置信区间:0.32-0.83)是肺癌的保护因素。漏斗图分析表明没有明显的发表偏倚。影响肺癌发病率的风险和保护因素多种多样。考虑到研究的局限性,我们应该有更多的研究项目来探索影响肺癌发病率的因素并解释研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Determination of Nurses' Attitudes Towards Evidence-Based Practice and Affecting Factors. The Effects of Therapeutic Touch on Test Anxiety among Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Determinants of the Development of Depression in Women During the Postpartum Period. Turkish Validity and Reliability Study of Prenatal Eating Behaviors Screening Tool. Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Adolescent Sleep Health Belief Scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1