Developing Allies: Preparing Pharmacy Students to Practice with Cultural and Structural Humility.

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education Pub Date : 2024-11-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101329
Jaime Maerten-Rivera, Malaika R Turner, Odinaka C Oranekwu, Margarita V DiVall
{"title":"Developing Allies: Preparing Pharmacy Students to Practice with Cultural and Structural Humility.","authors":"Jaime Maerten-Rivera, Malaika R Turner, Odinaka C Oranekwu, Margarita V DiVall","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The COEPA learning outcome of Cultural and Structural Humility (Ally) was updated causing programs to evaluate how this content is included. The authors reviewed relevant literature published within the past ten years (2014-2024) and provided a summary, and relevant recommendations, as well as resources.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>There were calls to action within the Academy for programs to develop a holistic programmatic approach to developing students' cultural and structural humility. Current shortcomings identified were that most programs: incorporated related competencies into their curriculum at the introduction level; lacked intentional development of related skills and behaviors, instead focusing on knowledge and attitudes; seldomly used validated, reliable, standardized assessments; and allowed this work to fall on a few \"experts\" rather than all faculty and preceptors.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Programs should aim for a holistic approach to prepare graduates to practice with cultural and structural humility, which should begin with creating structures to support it, such as appointment of an administrator or a diversity, equity, and inclusion committee. Integration of ally content should be intentional, spiraled, with mapping of competencies across didactic, experiential, and co-curriculum and across all levels of learning to ensure development of knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors. Students should have multiple assessment opportunities, including formative and summative, and programs should use standardized, valid and reliable assessment tools. Intentional development of all faculty, preceptors, and students is critical for success. Institutions are encouraged to share their initiatives with the Academy.</p><p><strong>Learning objectives: </strong>After reading the article, readers will be able to do the following as it relates to the Ally COEPA outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101329"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2024.101329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The COEPA learning outcome of Cultural and Structural Humility (Ally) was updated causing programs to evaluate how this content is included. The authors reviewed relevant literature published within the past ten years (2014-2024) and provided a summary, and relevant recommendations, as well as resources.

Findings: There were calls to action within the Academy for programs to develop a holistic programmatic approach to developing students' cultural and structural humility. Current shortcomings identified were that most programs: incorporated related competencies into their curriculum at the introduction level; lacked intentional development of related skills and behaviors, instead focusing on knowledge and attitudes; seldomly used validated, reliable, standardized assessments; and allowed this work to fall on a few "experts" rather than all faculty and preceptors.

Summary: Programs should aim for a holistic approach to prepare graduates to practice with cultural and structural humility, which should begin with creating structures to support it, such as appointment of an administrator or a diversity, equity, and inclusion committee. Integration of ally content should be intentional, spiraled, with mapping of competencies across didactic, experiential, and co-curriculum and across all levels of learning to ensure development of knowledge, skills, attitudes, and behaviors. Students should have multiple assessment opportunities, including formative and summative, and programs should use standardized, valid and reliable assessment tools. Intentional development of all faculty, preceptors, and students is critical for success. Institutions are encouraged to share their initiatives with the Academy.

Learning objectives: After reading the article, readers will be able to do the following as it relates to the Ally COEPA outcome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
培养盟友:培养药剂学学生以文化和结构谦逊的态度进行实践。
目标:更新了 COEPA 学习成果中的 "文化和结构谦逊"(Ally),以评估如何纳入该内容。作者回顾了过去十年(2014-2024 年)内发表的相关文献,并提供了摘要、相关建议和资源:研究结果:学院呼吁各项目采取行动,制定整体的项目方法来培养学生的文化和结构谦逊性。目前发现的不足是,大多数项目:在入门阶段就将相关能力纳入课程;缺乏对相关技能和行为的有意培养,而是将重点放在知识和态度上;很少使用经过验证的、可靠的标准化评估;允许这项工作由少数 "专家 "而非所有教师和实习生来完成。总结:项目应采用整体方法培养毕业生的文化和结构谦逊性,首先应建立支持该方法的结构,如任命一名管理者或一个多元化、公平和包容委员会。应有意识地、螺旋式地整合盟友内容,并在教学、体验、共同课程和所有学习层次中绘制能力图,以确保知识、技能、态度和行为的发展。学生应有多种评估机会,包括形成性和总结性评估,课程应使用标准化、有效和可靠的评估工具。有意识地培养所有教师、实习生和学生是成功的关键。我们鼓励各机构与学院分享他们的举措:阅读文章后,读者将能够做到以下与 Ally COEPA 成果相关的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
期刊最新文献
A Multisite, Longitudinal Study Assessing Prevalence of Anxiety in Student Pharmacists. Association Of Emotional Intelligence With Pharmacy Students' Leadership And Academic Performance. Developing Allies: Preparing Pharmacy Students to Practice with Cultural and Structural Humility. Determining ideal practices for student course evaluations using a modified Delphi approach. Perceptions of Pharmacy Faculty Regarding Factors Contributing to Declining First-Time NAPLEX Pass Rates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1