The Cutting Efficiency of a Hybrid Phacoemulsification Tip Using High and Low Intraocular Pressure Settings in Different Grades of Cataract.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2024-11-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S488581
Justin Spaulding, Brad Hall
{"title":"The Cutting Efficiency of a Hybrid Phacoemulsification Tip Using High and Low Intraocular Pressure Settings in Different Grades of Cataract.","authors":"Justin Spaulding, Brad Hall","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S488581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficiency of a hybrid tip in removing cataract grade 3 and 4 in high and low intraocular pressure (IOP) settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a randomized, prospective, double-arm contralateral eye study. One randomized eye of each subject had phacoemulsification with high IOP settings (50 mmHg) while the other eye had phacoemulsification with low IOP settings (20 mmHg). Operative endpoints included phaco time, aspiration time, fluid use, cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), total case time, total torsional time, and total longitudinal time. Postoperative endpoints included central corneal thickness (CCT), and IOP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 eyes (51 patients) completed the study. Phaco time in grade 3 and grade 4 cataracts were 38.4 ± 9.6 s and 44.1 ± 9.9 s in the high group, respectively, and 38.9 ± 8.6 s and 46.3 ± 11.0 s in the low group, respectively. Aspiration time in grade 3 and grade 4 cataracts were 95.3 ± 21.2 s and 111.8 ± 32.8 s in the high group, respectively, and 105.4 ± 27.0 s and 108.6 ± 23.1 s in the low group, respectively. Fluid volume used in grade 3 and grade 4 cataracts were 39.2 ± 6.8 mL and 45.2 ± 10.8 mL in the high group, respectively, and 38.3 ± 7.3 mL and 43.2 ± 8.0 mL in the low group, respectively. The CDE in grade 3 and grade 4 cataracts were 7.8 ± 2.6 and 10.2 ± 3.2 in the high group, respectively, and 7.7 ± 2.2 and 9.9 ± 4.5 in the low group, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results suggest that a hybrid phacoemulsification tip was efficient in removing cataracts of grade 3 and grade 4 with high and low IOP settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"18 ","pages":"3271-3276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11569703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S488581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficiency of a hybrid tip in removing cataract grade 3 and 4 in high and low intraocular pressure (IOP) settings.

Methods: This was a randomized, prospective, double-arm contralateral eye study. One randomized eye of each subject had phacoemulsification with high IOP settings (50 mmHg) while the other eye had phacoemulsification with low IOP settings (20 mmHg). Operative endpoints included phaco time, aspiration time, fluid use, cumulative dissipated energy (CDE), total case time, total torsional time, and total longitudinal time. Postoperative endpoints included central corneal thickness (CCT), and IOP.

Results: A total of 102 eyes (51 patients) completed the study. Phaco time in grade 3 and grade 4 cataracts were 38.4 ± 9.6 s and 44.1 ± 9.9 s in the high group, respectively, and 38.9 ± 8.6 s and 46.3 ± 11.0 s in the low group, respectively. Aspiration time in grade 3 and grade 4 cataracts were 95.3 ± 21.2 s and 111.8 ± 32.8 s in the high group, respectively, and 105.4 ± 27.0 s and 108.6 ± 23.1 s in the low group, respectively. Fluid volume used in grade 3 and grade 4 cataracts were 39.2 ± 6.8 mL and 45.2 ± 10.8 mL in the high group, respectively, and 38.3 ± 7.3 mL and 43.2 ± 8.0 mL in the low group, respectively. The CDE in grade 3 and grade 4 cataracts were 7.8 ± 2.6 and 10.2 ± 3.2 in the high group, respectively, and 7.7 ± 2.2 and 9.9 ± 4.5 in the low group, respectively.

Conclusion: Results suggest that a hybrid phacoemulsification tip was efficient in removing cataracts of grade 3 and grade 4 with high and low IOP settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在不同等级的白内障中使用高眼压和低眼压设置的混合型超声乳化吸头的切割效率
目的:评估混合型尖端在高眼压和低眼压环境下摘除 3 级和 4 级白内障的效率:这是一项随机、前瞻性、双臂对侧眼研究。每个受试者的一只随机眼在高眼压设置(50 mmHg)下进行超声乳化,另一只眼在低眼压设置(20 mmHg)下进行超声乳化。手术终点包括乳化时间、抽吸时间、液体用量、累积耗散能量(CDE)、总手术时间、总扭转时间和总纵向时间。术后终点包括中心角膜厚度(CCT)和眼压:共有 102 只眼睛(51 名患者)完成了研究。高组 3 级和 4 级白内障的超声乳化时间分别为(38.4 ± 9.6)秒和(44.1 ± 9.9)秒,低组分别为(38.9 ± 8.6)秒和(46.3 ± 11.0)秒。3 级和 4 级白内障的抽吸时间在高分组中分别为 95.3 ± 21.2 秒和 111.8 ± 32.8 秒,在低分组中分别为 105.4 ± 27.0 秒和 108.6 ± 23.1 秒。3 级和 4 级白内障患者使用的液体量分别为:高组(39.2 ± 6.8 mL)和(45.2 ± 10.8 mL),低组(38.3 ± 7.3 mL)和(43.2 ± 8.0 mL)。高组 3 级和 4 级白内障的 CDE 分别为 7.8 ± 2.6 和 10.2 ± 3.2,低组分别为 7.7 ± 2.2 和 9.9 ± 4.5:结果表明,混合型超声乳化吸头能在高眼压和低眼压设置下有效去除3级和4级白内障。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Preoperative Suboptimal Correction and Early Visual Recovery After SMILE: How Full vs Under/Over-Correction Shapes Outcomes. The Effect of Orthokeratology Lens Decentration on Ocular and Biomechanical Measurements. Clinical Tolerance to Experimentally Induced with-the-Rule and Against-the-Rule Astigmatism After Implantation of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens: A Defocus-Curve Study. Considerations for Glaucoma Evaluation and Management in Refractive Surgery Candidates. Understanding Keratoconus in Down Syndrome: From Etiology to Management - A Narrative Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1