Is the nicotine metabolite ratio a useful tool to improve the effectiveness, safety, and adherence to quitting smoking? Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

José Ignacio de Granda-Orive, Adolfo Alonso-Arroyo, Daniel López-Padilla, Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent, Segismundo Solano-Reina, Juan Antonio Riesco-Miranda, Carlos Rábade-Castedo, Miguel Jiménez-Gómez, Fernando Revuelta-Salgado, Carlos A Jiménez-Ruiz
{"title":"Is the nicotine metabolite ratio a useful tool to improve the effectiveness, safety, and adherence to quitting smoking? Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.","authors":"José Ignacio de Granda-Orive, Adolfo Alonso-Arroyo, Daniel López-Padilla, Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent, Segismundo Solano-Reina, Juan Antonio Riesco-Miranda, Carlos Rábade-Castedo, Miguel Jiménez-Gómez, Fernando Revuelta-Salgado, Carlos A Jiménez-Ruiz","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2024.2429675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We have carried out a systematic review of the literature (SRL) and a meta-analysis (MA) to answer: 1. Validity of the nicotine metabolite ratio (NMR) in improving the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments (PT) for smoking cessation (SC). 2. Validity of the NMR to improve the safety of the use of these PT? and 3. Validity of NMR in improving adherence to these PT?</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We carried out an SRL (six databases) and an MA for responding to the questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PT for SC (any treatment) is more effective in smoking subjects with slow NMR compared with fast NMR. Varenicline (VR) is equally effective in fast and slow NMR (RR 1.04 [CI 95% 0.75, 1.44]). When we compared those smokers who were treated to quit smoking with VR or nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in fast metabolizers, we found that abstinence was in favor of those who were treated with VR (RR 1.40 [CI 95% 1.02, 1.91]). Those who were treated to quit smoking with NRT presented better results in slow Metabolizers (RR 0.70 [CI 95% 0.58, 0.83]). NMR increases the safety and adherence of treatments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We suggest that NMR is a good biomarker in the personalization of smoking cessation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94007,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2024.2429675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We have carried out a systematic review of the literature (SRL) and a meta-analysis (MA) to answer: 1. Validity of the nicotine metabolite ratio (NMR) in improving the effectiveness of pharmacological treatments (PT) for smoking cessation (SC). 2. Validity of the NMR to improve the safety of the use of these PT? and 3. Validity of NMR in improving adherence to these PT?

Method: We carried out an SRL (six databases) and an MA for responding to the questions.

Results: PT for SC (any treatment) is more effective in smoking subjects with slow NMR compared with fast NMR. Varenicline (VR) is equally effective in fast and slow NMR (RR 1.04 [CI 95% 0.75, 1.44]). When we compared those smokers who were treated to quit smoking with VR or nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in fast metabolizers, we found that abstinence was in favor of those who were treated with VR (RR 1.40 [CI 95% 1.02, 1.91]). Those who were treated to quit smoking with NRT presented better results in slow Metabolizers (RR 0.70 [CI 95% 0.58, 0.83]). NMR increases the safety and adherence of treatments.

Conclusions: We suggest that NMR is a good biomarker in the personalization of smoking cessation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼古丁代谢物比率是提高戒烟有效性、安全性和依从性的有用工具吗?文献的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
简介我们对文献进行了系统回顾(SRL)和荟萃分析(MA),以回答以下问题:1.尼古丁代谢物比值(NMR)在提高戒烟药物治疗(PT)效果方面的有效性。2.2. NMR 在提高这些药物治疗使用安全性方面的有效性?NMR 在提高戒烟药物治疗依从性方面的有效性?我们进行了一次 SRL(六个数据库)和一次 MA 以回答问题:结果:与快速 NMR 相比,慢 NMR 对吸烟者进行 SC(任何治疗)的治疗更有效。伐伦克林(VR)对快速和慢速 NMR 同样有效(RR 1.04 [CI 95% 0.75, 1.44])。当我们对快速代谢者中接受 VR 或尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)戒烟的吸烟者进行比较时,发现接受 VR 治疗的吸烟者更容易戒烟(RR 1.40 [CI 95% 1.02, 1.91])。在慢代谢者中,接受 NRT 戒烟治疗的效果更好(RR 0.70 [CI 95% 0.58, 0.83])。NMR提高了治疗的安全性和依从性:我们认为 NMR 是个性化戒烟的良好生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acute respiratory failure in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Measuring exhaled nitric oxide in COPD: from theoretical consideration to practical views. Is the nicotine metabolite ratio a useful tool to improve the effectiveness, safety, and adherence to quitting smoking? Systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. An update on endobronchial valve therapy for severe emphysema: real world data and special indications. What is new in synthetic lung surfactant protein technology?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1