Asymmetric nexus between shadow economy and financial instability: Does institutional quality matter?

IF 2.9 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1016/j.qref.2024.101932
Faisal Faisal , Suresh Ramakrishnan , Sami Ur Rahman , Adnan Ali , Hamid Ghazi H Sulimany
{"title":"Asymmetric nexus between shadow economy and financial instability: Does institutional quality matter?","authors":"Faisal Faisal ,&nbsp;Suresh Ramakrishnan ,&nbsp;Sami Ur Rahman ,&nbsp;Adnan Ali ,&nbsp;Hamid Ghazi H Sulimany","doi":"10.1016/j.qref.2024.101932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Policymakers worldwide, especially central banks, are concerned about the causes and remedies of financial instability. This study examines the asymmetric influence of the shadow economy on financial instability. Moreover, the study analyzes the moderating role of institutional quality (IQ) in the shadow economy and financial instability nexus. This study used novel econometric techniques, including RALS-ADF and RALS-LM unit root tests, RALS-Fourier ARDL, NARDL, and single Fourier-Toda and Yamamoto causality tests, using yearly data from 1984 to 2020 for Turkey. Specifically, a positive shock to IQ declines financial instability, while a negative shock to IQ promotes it. Further, the negative shock to SE lessens the financial instability. Moreover, the negative shock to the interaction term implies that the shadow economy outweighs the IQ (depending on the level of IQ) in its effect in the case of Turkey, i.e., even if IQ increases (which usually decreases financial instability), the increasing SE has a dominant effect, and eventually upsurges financial instability. Additionally, in line with the institutional failure hypothesis, the negative shock to interaction term leads to a substantial increase in financial instability. Finally, the findings showed a one-way causality that runs from economic growth to financial instability and bidirectional causality between SE and GDP. The government should reduce shadow economic activities in the economy by enhancing IQ, which can increase government revenue and reduce financial instability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47962,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","volume":"98 ","pages":"Article 101932"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062976924001388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policymakers worldwide, especially central banks, are concerned about the causes and remedies of financial instability. This study examines the asymmetric influence of the shadow economy on financial instability. Moreover, the study analyzes the moderating role of institutional quality (IQ) in the shadow economy and financial instability nexus. This study used novel econometric techniques, including RALS-ADF and RALS-LM unit root tests, RALS-Fourier ARDL, NARDL, and single Fourier-Toda and Yamamoto causality tests, using yearly data from 1984 to 2020 for Turkey. Specifically, a positive shock to IQ declines financial instability, while a negative shock to IQ promotes it. Further, the negative shock to SE lessens the financial instability. Moreover, the negative shock to the interaction term implies that the shadow economy outweighs the IQ (depending on the level of IQ) in its effect in the case of Turkey, i.e., even if IQ increases (which usually decreases financial instability), the increasing SE has a dominant effect, and eventually upsurges financial instability. Additionally, in line with the institutional failure hypothesis, the negative shock to interaction term leads to a substantial increase in financial instability. Finally, the findings showed a one-way causality that runs from economic growth to financial instability and bidirectional causality between SE and GDP. The government should reduce shadow economic activities in the economy by enhancing IQ, which can increase government revenue and reduce financial instability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影子经济与金融不稳定之间的不对称关系:机构质量是否重要?
全世界的政策制定者,尤其是中央银行,都在关注金融不稳定的原因和补救措施。本研究探讨了影子经济对金融不稳定性的非对称影响。此外,本研究还分析了制度质量(IQ)在影子经济与金融不稳定关系中的调节作用。本研究使用了新颖的计量经济学技术,包括 RALS-ADF 和 RALS-LM 单位根检验、RALS-傅里叶 ARDL、NARDL 以及单傅里叶-托达和山本因果检验,并使用了土耳其 1984 年至 2020 年的年度数据。具体而言,智商的正向冲击会降低金融不稳定性,而智商的负向冲击则会促进金融不稳定性。此外,SE 的负向冲击会降低金融不稳定性。此外,交互项的负向冲击意味着,就土耳其而言,影子经济的影响超过了智商(取决于智商水平),也就是说,即使智商提高(通常会降低金融不稳定性),SE 的提高也会产生主导作用,最终加剧金融不稳定性。此外,与制度失灵假说一致,交互项的负向冲击导致金融不稳定性大幅上升。最后,研究结果表明,经济增长与金融不稳定之间存在单向因果关系,SE 与 GDP 之间存在双向因果关系。政府应通过提高智商来减少经济中的影子经济活动,从而增加政府收入,降低金融不稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
118
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance (QREF) attracts and publishes high quality manuscripts that cover topics in the areas of economics, financial economics and finance. The subject matter may be theoretical, empirical or policy related. Emphasis is placed on quality, originality, clear arguments, persuasive evidence, intelligent analysis and clear writing. At least one Special Issue is published per year. These issues have guest editors, are devoted to a single theme and the papers have well known authors. In addition we pride ourselves in being able to provide three to four article "Focus" sections in most of our issues.
期刊最新文献
Quantile volatility connectedness among themes and sectors: Novel evidence from China Credit ratings and corporate ESG behavior Unveiling dynamics: Financial performance determinants in the Ghanaian insurance industry Institutional blockholder monitoring and stock price crash risk Employee stock ownership plan as a measure of covering up corporate fraud: Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1