Dynamometry for the assessment of trunk muscle strength in postpartum women with pregnancy-related posterior pelvic girdle pain: A reliability study

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100738
Fahimeh-Sadat Jafarian , Mahmonir Jafari-Harandi , Gillian Yeowell , Ebrahim Sadeghi-Demneh
{"title":"Dynamometry for the assessment of trunk muscle strength in postpartum women with pregnancy-related posterior pelvic girdle pain: A reliability study","authors":"Fahimeh-Sadat Jafarian ,&nbsp;Mahmonir Jafari-Harandi ,&nbsp;Gillian Yeowell ,&nbsp;Ebrahim Sadeghi-Demneh","doi":"10.1016/j.ijosm.2024.100738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To investigate the inter and intra-rater reliability of maximum isometric trunk muscular strength in postpartum women with pregnancy-related posterior pelvic girdle pain using a handheld dynamometer.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Thirty women (30.13 ± 3.67 years) with pregnancy-related posterior pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) had their trunk muscular strength assessed using a handheld dynamometer. Inter-rater reliability was estimated for measurements of two separate raters on the first day of the investigation. The tests were repeated with the first rater seven days later to determine the intra-rater reliability. A digital handheld dynamometer was used for testing, and a metal bar was used to secure it to a table. Participants were instructed to use maximal force to push the dynamometer in various trunk flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotational orientations. Each trial was repeated three times and averaged to obtain the representative assessment data. Analysis of variance, interclass correlation, absolute agreement, and standard error of measurements were used to evaluate the repeatability of measurements.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Excellent inter and intra-rater reliability were demonstrated. The inter-rater reliability, computed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), ranged from 0.979 to 0.992, and intra-rater reliability (ICC) ranged from 0.966 to 0.987. The standard error of measurement ranged from 0.35 % to 1.26 % for the different tests. Additionally, the dynamometer values in women with PPGP might be reported using just one trial after an instruction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The maximum isometric trunk muscular strength is reliable, and a quantitative assessment of the trunk strength in women with postpartum pregnancy-related posterior pelvic girdle pain and could be used to monitor the changes in postural stability between sessions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 100738"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1746068924000312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate the inter and intra-rater reliability of maximum isometric trunk muscular strength in postpartum women with pregnancy-related posterior pelvic girdle pain using a handheld dynamometer.

Methods

Thirty women (30.13 ± 3.67 years) with pregnancy-related posterior pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) had their trunk muscular strength assessed using a handheld dynamometer. Inter-rater reliability was estimated for measurements of two separate raters on the first day of the investigation. The tests were repeated with the first rater seven days later to determine the intra-rater reliability. A digital handheld dynamometer was used for testing, and a metal bar was used to secure it to a table. Participants were instructed to use maximal force to push the dynamometer in various trunk flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotational orientations. Each trial was repeated three times and averaged to obtain the representative assessment data. Analysis of variance, interclass correlation, absolute agreement, and standard error of measurements were used to evaluate the repeatability of measurements.

Results

Excellent inter and intra-rater reliability were demonstrated. The inter-rater reliability, computed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), ranged from 0.979 to 0.992, and intra-rater reliability (ICC) ranged from 0.966 to 0.987. The standard error of measurement ranged from 0.35 % to 1.26 % for the different tests. Additionally, the dynamometer values in women with PPGP might be reported using just one trial after an instruction.

Conclusion

The maximum isometric trunk muscular strength is reliable, and a quantitative assessment of the trunk strength in women with postpartum pregnancy-related posterior pelvic girdle pain and could be used to monitor the changes in postural stability between sessions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用测力法评估产后妇女因妊娠引起的骨盆后腰痛的躯干肌肉力量:可靠性研究
方法 使用手持式测力计对 30 名患有妊娠相关后盆骨腰痛(PPGP)的妇女(30.13 ± 3.67 岁)的躯干肌肉力量进行评估。在调查的第一天,对两名不同评分者的测量结果进行了评分者间可靠性评估。七天后由第一位评分者重复测试,以确定评分者内部的可靠性。测试使用的是数字式手持测力计,并用一根金属杆将其固定在桌子上。参与者被要求在不同的躯干屈曲、伸展、侧屈和旋转方向上使用最大力量推动测力计。每次试验重复三次并取平均值,以获得具有代表性的评估数据。采用方差分析、类间相关性、绝对一致性和测量标准误差来评估测量的可重复性。使用类内相关系数(ICC)计算的评分者间可靠性为 0.979 至 0.992,评分者内部可靠性(ICC)为 0.966 至 0.987。不同测试的测量标准误差在 0.35 % 到 1.26 % 之间。结论最大等距躯干肌肉力量是可靠的,是对产后妊娠相关后盆腰痛妇女躯干力量的定量评估,可用于监测疗程间姿势稳定性的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.80%
发文量
42
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Osteopathic Medicine is a peer-reviewed journal that provides for the publication of high quality research articles and review papers that are as broad as the many disciplines that influence and underpin the principles and practice of osteopathic medicine. Particular emphasis is given to basic science research, clinical epidemiology and health social science in relation to osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine. The Editorial Board encourages submission of articles based on both quantitative and qualitative research designs. The Editorial Board also aims to provide a forum for discourse and debate on any aspect of osteopathy and neuromusculoskeletal medicine with the aim of critically evaluating existing practices in regard to the diagnosis, treatment and management of patients with neuromusculoskeletal disorders and somatic dysfunction. All manuscripts submitted to the IJOM are subject to a blinded review process. The categories currently available for publication include reports of original research, review papers, commentaries and articles related to clinical practice, including case reports. Further details can be found in the IJOM Instructions for Authors. Manuscripts are accepted for publication with the understanding that no substantial part has been, or will be published elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
Dynamometry for the assessment of trunk muscle strength in postpartum women with pregnancy-related posterior pelvic girdle pain: A reliability study Evaluating perspectives, knowledge and behaviors of osteopathic medicine in a United States osteopathic medical school: A study in employee education and changes in understanding An appraisal of neuroimmune changes and potential benefits of osteopathic manipulative treatment integration with therapeutic management of post COVID-19 condition: A literature review Evidence-informed approach of sighs in the scope of osteopathic practice Autonomic nervous system and viscera-related responses to manual therapy: A narrative overview
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1