Balancing safety and efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparins in neonates: a systematic review

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102601
Marieke Verweij , Mirjam M. van Weissenbruch , Irene L.M. Klaassen
{"title":"Balancing safety and efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparins in neonates: a systematic review","authors":"Marieke Verweij ,&nbsp;Mirjam M. van Weissenbruch ,&nbsp;Irene L.M. Klaassen","doi":"10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rising incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in neonates has led to increased use of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), but optimal dosages remain uncertain. A serious adverse effect of LMWHs is major bleeding. Given the vulnerability of neonates to major bleeding, we aimed to review therapeutic and prophylactic LMWH dosages to achieve target anti-factor Xa ranges of 0.5 and 1.0 U/mL and 0.1 and 0.4 U/mL, respectively. Our secondary aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of LMWHs in neonates. A systematic review of all published studies between 1996 and 2023 that pertained to the dosing, safety, or efficacy of LMWH in preterm and term neonates. Studies were identified through the Medline database. Data on LMWH dosages, bleeding events, resolution and recurrence, and anti-factor Xa levels were analyzed. A total of 38 studies involving 1145 neonates were included. To achieve a therapeutic or prophylactic target range, weight-adjusted initial dosages of LMWH had to be increased by 21% particularly in premature neonates. During therapeutic therapy, major bleeding occurred in 4.1% and minor bleeding in 7.1%. During prophylactic therapy, 11.4% experienced major bleeding and 17.1% minor bleeding. With therapeutic dosages, 55.8% achieved complete VTE resolution. Additionally, 68.5% of neonates initially failed to achieve therapeutic anti-factor Xa levels, persisting in 29.4% despite dose adjustments. A higher initial therapeutic dosage of LMWHs may be needed in neonates. In addition, the patient’s gestational age must be considered in the dosing strategy to optimize outcomes. Although this must be weighed against bleeding risk at an individual level.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20893,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","volume":"8 7","pages":"Article 102601"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2475037924002966","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rising incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in neonates has led to increased use of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs), but optimal dosages remain uncertain. A serious adverse effect of LMWHs is major bleeding. Given the vulnerability of neonates to major bleeding, we aimed to review therapeutic and prophylactic LMWH dosages to achieve target anti-factor Xa ranges of 0.5 and 1.0 U/mL and 0.1 and 0.4 U/mL, respectively. Our secondary aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of LMWHs in neonates. A systematic review of all published studies between 1996 and 2023 that pertained to the dosing, safety, or efficacy of LMWH in preterm and term neonates. Studies were identified through the Medline database. Data on LMWH dosages, bleeding events, resolution and recurrence, and anti-factor Xa levels were analyzed. A total of 38 studies involving 1145 neonates were included. To achieve a therapeutic or prophylactic target range, weight-adjusted initial dosages of LMWH had to be increased by 21% particularly in premature neonates. During therapeutic therapy, major bleeding occurred in 4.1% and minor bleeding in 7.1%. During prophylactic therapy, 11.4% experienced major bleeding and 17.1% minor bleeding. With therapeutic dosages, 55.8% achieved complete VTE resolution. Additionally, 68.5% of neonates initially failed to achieve therapeutic anti-factor Xa levels, persisting in 29.4% despite dose adjustments. A higher initial therapeutic dosage of LMWHs may be needed in neonates. In addition, the patient’s gestational age must be considered in the dosing strategy to optimize outcomes. Although this must be weighed against bleeding risk at an individual level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
平衡新生儿使用低分子量肝素的安全性和有效性:系统综述
新生儿静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)的发病率不断上升,导致低分子量肝素(LMWHs)的使用增加,但最佳剂量仍不确定。LMWHs 的一个严重不良反应是大出血。鉴于新生儿易发生大出血,我们旨在审查治疗性和预防性 LMWH 剂量,以实现抗因子 Xa 的目标范围分别为 0.5 和 1.0 U/mL,以及 0.1 和 0.4 U/mL。我们的次要目的是评估 LMWHs 在新生儿中的安全性和有效性。我们对 1996 年至 2023 年间发表的所有有关早产儿和足月新生儿 LMWH 剂量、安全性或疗效的研究进行了系统性回顾。研究通过 Medline 数据库进行鉴定。分析了有关 LMWH 剂量、出血事件、缓解和复发以及抗因子 Xa 水平的数据。共纳入了 38 项研究,涉及 1145 名新生儿。为达到治疗或预防目标范围,经体重调整后的 LMWH 初始剂量必须增加 21%,尤其是早产新生儿。在治疗过程中,4.1%的新生儿出现大出血,7.1%的新生儿出现轻微出血。在预防性治疗期间,11.4%的新生儿出现大出血,17.1%出现轻微出血。在治疗剂量下,55.8% 的新生儿完全消除了 VTE。此外,68.5% 的新生儿最初未能达到治疗性抗因子 Xa 水平,29.4% 的新生儿在调整剂量后仍未能达到治疗性抗因子 Xa 水平。新生儿可能需要更高的 LMWHs 初始治疗剂量。此外,在剂量策略中还必须考虑患者的妊娠年龄,以优化治疗效果。尽管这必须根据个体情况与出血风险进行权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
212
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
No correlation between thrombin generation and emicizumab levels: implications for monitoring emicizumab therapy. Characterization of bleeding in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura in the precaplacizumab era: a retrospective nationwide analysis. Sex-specific cut-off for dilute Russell's viper venom time lupus anticoagulant test may be of value. Health literacy in pediatric thrombosis: a landscape analysis. Time trends of catheter-directed treatment in acute pulmonary embolism in Germany.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1