Intracranial Response to Selpercatinib After Pralsetinib-Induced Disease Progression in Rearranged During Transfection Fusion-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Case Report

Illaa Smesseim MD, Tijmen van der Wel MD, Sushil K. Badrising MD, PhD
{"title":"Intracranial Response to Selpercatinib After Pralsetinib-Induced Disease Progression in Rearranged During Transfection Fusion-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Case Report","authors":"Illaa Smesseim MD,&nbsp;Tijmen van der Wel MD,&nbsp;Sushil K. Badrising MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>RET fusion-positive NSCLC accounts for 1% to 2% of lung carcinoma cases. Although two Food and Drug Administration–approved selective RET inhibitors, pralsetinib, and selpercatinib, have revealed efficacy in managing RET fusion-positive NSCLC, this case series is unique in its focus on the intracranial response to selpercatinib after disease progression during pralsetinib treatment. This report contributes to the literature by providing evidence of selpercatinib’s potential as a treatment option in such refractory cases. The patients described in both cases were diagnosed with metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC and developed intracranial metastases during pralsetinib treatment. After switching to selpercatinib, both exhibited significant intracranial responses. The first patient reported a reduction in brain metastasis size and maintained a response for over 1.5 years. The second patient also responded intracranially to selpercatinib but unfortunately passed away 8 months later owing to pulmonary hemorrhage, possibly linked to prior radiation treatment. These cases highlight the potential efficacy of selpercatinib in treating intracranial metastases in RET fusion-positive patients with NSCLC after pralsetinib-refractory progression. The key takeaway is that selpercatinib may offer a viable treatment option in such scenarios, although more extensive studies are needed to determine its role as a monotherapy or in combination with other treatments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"5 12","pages":"Article 100730"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324001000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

RET fusion-positive NSCLC accounts for 1% to 2% of lung carcinoma cases. Although two Food and Drug Administration–approved selective RET inhibitors, pralsetinib, and selpercatinib, have revealed efficacy in managing RET fusion-positive NSCLC, this case series is unique in its focus on the intracranial response to selpercatinib after disease progression during pralsetinib treatment. This report contributes to the literature by providing evidence of selpercatinib’s potential as a treatment option in such refractory cases. The patients described in both cases were diagnosed with metastatic RET fusion-positive NSCLC and developed intracranial metastases during pralsetinib treatment. After switching to selpercatinib, both exhibited significant intracranial responses. The first patient reported a reduction in brain metastasis size and maintained a response for over 1.5 years. The second patient also responded intracranially to selpercatinib but unfortunately passed away 8 months later owing to pulmonary hemorrhage, possibly linked to prior radiation treatment. These cases highlight the potential efficacy of selpercatinib in treating intracranial metastases in RET fusion-positive patients with NSCLC after pralsetinib-refractory progression. The key takeaway is that selpercatinib may offer a viable treatment option in such scenarios, although more extensive studies are needed to determine its role as a monotherapy or in combination with other treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转染融合重组阳性非小细胞肺癌患者在普拉塞替尼诱导疾病进展后对赛乐西替尼的颅内反应:病例报告
RET融合阳性NSCLC占肺癌病例的1%至2%。虽然美国食品和药物管理局批准的两种选择性RET抑制剂普拉塞替尼和色瑞帕替尼在治疗RET融合阳性NSCLC方面具有疗效,但本系列病例的独特之处在于它关注了普拉塞替尼治疗期间疾病进展后对色瑞帕替尼的颅内反应。本报告提供了证据,证明赛乐替尼有可能成为此类难治性病例的治疗选择,从而为文献做出了贡献。两例患者均被诊断为转移性RET融合阳性NSCLC,并在普拉塞替尼治疗期间出现颅内转移。在改用赛帕替尼治疗后,两例患者均出现了明显的颅内反应。第一例患者的脑转移灶缩小,并在超过1.5年的时间里一直保持着这种反应。第二名患者也对赛帕替尼产生了颅内反应,但不幸在8个月后因肺出血去世,这可能与之前的放射治疗有关。这些病例凸显了色瑞帕替尼治疗普拉塞替尼难治性进展后RET融合阳性NSCLC患者颅内转移的潜在疗效。尽管还需要进行更广泛的研究来确定其作为单一疗法或与其他疗法联合使用的作用,但关键的启示是,在这种情况下,赛帕替尼可能是一种可行的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
First Report of Response to Tarlatamab in a Patient With DLL3-Positive Pulmonary Carcinoid: Case Report A Response to the Letter to the Editor: “Heart and Lung Dose as Predictors of Overall Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Lung Cancer: A National Multicenter Study” Racial Differences in Systemic Immune Parameters in Individuals With Lung Cancer Brief Report of a New Anatomical Region at Risk in Thoracic Radiotherapy: From Discovery to Implementation Entrectinib-Induced Myocarditis and Acute Heart Failure Responding to Steroid Treatment: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1