Real-World Outcomes of Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Receiving a Combination of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab as First- or Later-Line Treatment

Sabine Schmid MD , Lisa Holer MSc , Katrin Gysel MSc , Kira-Lee Koster MD , Sacha I. Rothschild MD , Laura A. Boos MD , Lorenz Frehner MD , Sabine Cardoso Almeida MD , Christian Britschgi MD, PhD , Yannis Metaxas MD , Michael Mark MD , Patrizia Froesch MD , Wolf-Dieter Janthur MD , Anna Allemann MD , Christine Waibel MD , Catherine Von der Mühll-Schill MD , Martin Früh MD , Laetitia A. Mauti MD, PhD
{"title":"Real-World Outcomes of Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Receiving a Combination of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab as First- or Later-Line Treatment","authors":"Sabine Schmid MD ,&nbsp;Lisa Holer MSc ,&nbsp;Katrin Gysel MSc ,&nbsp;Kira-Lee Koster MD ,&nbsp;Sacha I. Rothschild MD ,&nbsp;Laura A. Boos MD ,&nbsp;Lorenz Frehner MD ,&nbsp;Sabine Cardoso Almeida MD ,&nbsp;Christian Britschgi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Yannis Metaxas MD ,&nbsp;Michael Mark MD ,&nbsp;Patrizia Froesch MD ,&nbsp;Wolf-Dieter Janthur MD ,&nbsp;Anna Allemann MD ,&nbsp;Christine Waibel MD ,&nbsp;Catherine Von der Mühll-Schill MD ,&nbsp;Martin Früh MD ,&nbsp;Laetitia A. Mauti MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>On the basis of the positive results of CheckMate-743, first-line (1L) treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) with the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi-nivo) has become a standard-of-care. Furthermore, patients who received 1L platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy are often considered for second or further-line (2L+) ipi-nivo on the basis of MAPS2 results. Here we report on real-world survival and safety outcomes of ipi-nivo for patients with MPM in Switzerland.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twelve cancer centers contributed data to this retrospective cohort. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, histology, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), and previous/subsequent therapies were collected. The efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed by local investigators.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of the 109 patients with MPM treated with ipi-nivo between November 2017 and March 2023 (median follow-up of 16.6 months) 75% had epithelioid, 9% biphasic, and 16% sarcomatoid histology. The median age was 72 years; 91% were males, and 83% had an ECOG PS of 0 to 1. Ipilimumab in combination with nivolumab was given as 1L in 43% and as 2L+ treatment in 57% of patients. The objective response rate was 21% in 1L and 15% in 2L+. Median progression-free survival was 6.5 and 2.8 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) from the start of ipi-nivo was 12.6 months for 1L and 6.9 months for 2L+. No differences in OS were observed depending on age and programmed death-ligand 1 expression. Nevertheless, the median OS was significantly worse in patients with an ECOG PS of 2 or higher than those with an ECOG PS of 0 to 1 (2.4 versus 11.9 months, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade related to ipi-nivo treatment occurred in 65 patients (62%). The highest-grade TRAE was 1 to 2 in 58% of these patients and 3 or higher in 42% Treatment discontinuation due to a TRAE occurred in 22% of patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>In this real-world cohort of patients with MPM treated with ipi-nivo survival outcomes were inferior to those reported in the CheckMate-743 and MAPS2 trials, whereas safety outcomes were similar.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"5 12","pages":"Article 100735"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266636432400105X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

On the basis of the positive results of CheckMate-743, first-line (1L) treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) with the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi-nivo) has become a standard-of-care. Furthermore, patients who received 1L platinum/pemetrexed chemotherapy are often considered for second or further-line (2L+) ipi-nivo on the basis of MAPS2 results. Here we report on real-world survival and safety outcomes of ipi-nivo for patients with MPM in Switzerland.

Methods

Twelve cancer centers contributed data to this retrospective cohort. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, histology, programmed death-ligand 1 expression, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), and previous/subsequent therapies were collected. The efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed by local investigators.

Results

Of the 109 patients with MPM treated with ipi-nivo between November 2017 and March 2023 (median follow-up of 16.6 months) 75% had epithelioid, 9% biphasic, and 16% sarcomatoid histology. The median age was 72 years; 91% were males, and 83% had an ECOG PS of 0 to 1. Ipilimumab in combination with nivolumab was given as 1L in 43% and as 2L+ treatment in 57% of patients. The objective response rate was 21% in 1L and 15% in 2L+. Median progression-free survival was 6.5 and 2.8 months, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) from the start of ipi-nivo was 12.6 months for 1L and 6.9 months for 2L+. No differences in OS were observed depending on age and programmed death-ligand 1 expression. Nevertheless, the median OS was significantly worse in patients with an ECOG PS of 2 or higher than those with an ECOG PS of 0 to 1 (2.4 versus 11.9 months, p < 0.001). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of any grade related to ipi-nivo treatment occurred in 65 patients (62%). The highest-grade TRAE was 1 to 2 in 58% of these patients and 3 or higher in 42% Treatment discontinuation due to a TRAE occurred in 22% of patients.

Conclusion

In this real-world cohort of patients with MPM treated with ipi-nivo survival outcomes were inferior to those reported in the CheckMate-743 and MAPS2 trials, whereas safety outcomes were similar.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恶性胸膜间皮瘤患者接受伊匹单抗和 Nivolumab 联合疗法作为一线或二线治疗的实际效果
目的 在CheckMate-743取得积极成果的基础上,伊匹单抗和尼夫单抗(ipi-nivo)联合治疗恶性胸膜间皮瘤(MPM)的一线(1L)疗法已成为标准疗法。此外,根据MAPS2的结果,接受过1L铂/培美曲塞化疗的患者通常会被考虑接受二线或三线(2L+)ipi-nivo治疗。在此,我们报告了瑞士 MPM 患者接受 ipi-nivo 治疗的实际生存率和安全性结果。收集的基线特征包括年龄、性别、组织学、程序性死亡配体 1 表达、东部合作肿瘤学组(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group)表现状态(ECOG PS)以及先前/后续疗法。结果在2017年11月至2023年3月期间接受ipi-nivo治疗的109名MPM患者中(中位随访16.6个月),75%为上皮样组织学,9%为双相组织学,16%为肉瘤样组织学。43%的患者接受了伊匹单抗联合尼妥珠单抗的1L治疗,57%的患者接受了2L+治疗。1L 的客观反应率为 21%,2L+ 的客观反应率为 15%。中位无进展生存期分别为6.5个月和2.8个月。从开始接受ipi-nivo治疗起,1L患者的中位总生存期(OS)为12.6个月,2L+患者的中位总生存期(OS)为6.9个月。根据年龄和程序性死亡配体1表达的不同,OS没有差异。然而,ECOG PS 为 2 或以上的患者的中位 OS 明显低于 ECOG PS 为 0 至 1 的患者(2.4 个月对 11.9 个月,p < 0.001)。65名患者(62%)发生了与ipi-nivo治疗相关的任何级别的治疗相关不良事件(TRAE)。结论 在这组接受 ipi-nivo 治疗的 MPM 患者中,实际生存结果不如 CheckMate-743 和 MAPS2 试验报告的结果,但安全性结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊最新文献
First Report of Response to Tarlatamab in a Patient With DLL3-Positive Pulmonary Carcinoid: Case Report A Response to the Letter to the Editor: “Heart and Lung Dose as Predictors of Overall Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Lung Cancer: A National Multicenter Study” Racial Differences in Systemic Immune Parameters in Individuals With Lung Cancer Brief Report of a New Anatomical Region at Risk in Thoracic Radiotherapy: From Discovery to Implementation Entrectinib-Induced Myocarditis and Acute Heart Failure Responding to Steroid Treatment: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1